A influência das artes cênicas nas decisões do tribunal do júri

Abstract

This monograph deals with the science of law-performing arts association in an attempt to identify whether the decisions of the Judgment Council are formed from the technical evidence presented by the defense and the prosecution or performance‟s preponderance of parquet members and / or parties‟s representative (defense counsel and assistant prosecutor). We are dealing here with an empirical and qualitative research that had as starting point two emblematic cases judged by the 1st Court of the Salvador Jury. Thus, it analyzes how it contributes to legal professionals and, above all, in their performance in the jury court‟s plenary. The research is presented in three phases of development, first will be treat with formal questions about the composition of the jury court, soon will be deal the relationship of this institute throughout history until reaching the 1988 Magna Carta of Brazil and it will makes a correlation of the appearance of the jury court from the Ésquilo‟s Orestes Trilogy in the Greek tragedy. Finally, will make a more specific analysis between the exemplary concrete cases brought to this study and information obtained through a field research that took place through interviews with legal professionals in the master case Moa do Katendê and the selected theoretical frameworks. The present and relevance are justified in view of the need for the legal professional to seek completeness, visiting other areas of science as a way to add to their knowledge other experiences, not making law and its techniques an area of isolated knowledge from anothers, which it disregards that judicial decisions are purely rational acts, based on the legal system, as if there were no extra legal influence.