Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/1306
metadata.dc.type: Artigo de Periódico
Artigo de Periódico
Title: Comparação entre os métodos linear e não linear para a avaliação da incerteza de medição
Authors: Martins, Márcio
Kalid, Ricardo de Araújo
Nery, Gesner
Teixeira, Lucas
Gonçalves, Guilherme
metadata.dc.creator: Martins, Márcio
Kalid, Ricardo de Araújo
Nery, Gesner
Teixeira, Lucas
Gonçalves, Guilherme
Abstract: The main method recognized by the metrologists for the eval- uation of measurement uncertainty is de facto the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (ISO Guide). Due to some limitations of the proposed method by ISO Guide however, ISO has developed a supplementary method for evaluating the measurement uncertainty based on the propagation of probability density functions using the Monte Carlo method (ISO-S1). The present paper discusses these methods for the quantification of measurement uncertainty. We review the literature, in particular the main papers pre- senting these modern approaches. We also discuss the merits and the limitations of the ISO Guide and ISO-S1 approaches. Furthermore, a comparative study between these two meth- ods was carried out in two case studies. The obtained results show that it is necessary to evaluate the influence of the de- gree of non linearity in order to estimate the measurement uncertainty before either method is chosen.
Keywords: measurement uncertainty
Monte Carlo
method, non linear models
propagation of probability density functions
URI: http://www.repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/1306
Issue Date: Nov-2010
Appears in Collections:Artigo Publicado em Periódico (PEI)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Martins et al._2010(2).pdf312,59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.