Aspectos da interdiscursividade dos enunciados polêmico-religiosos em torno das sexualidades e identidades de gêneros dissidentes

Abstract

The present dissertation aims topresent someaspectsof the interdiscursive analysis that constitutesandcrossestwodiscursivepositionsaroundthedissidentsexualitiesandidentities ofdissentinggenres. Itwassought toanalyze, throughtheFrenchDiscourseAnalysisbias, according to the concepts postulated byDominiqueMaingueneau,mainly in the theories presented inhisworksSémantiquede laPolémique(1983),GenesisofDiscourses (2008), Discursos Constituyentes (2000) and New Trends in Discourse Analysis (1997), the discursivepositionsoffundamentalistChristianchurchesandinclusiveChristianchurchesin the face of the faith of the subjects of the LGBT population. The analysis of the fundamentalist and inclusive polemical-religious statements collected in some discursive materialities referringtodissident sexualities,wedonot intendtoapproachlinearly,but to analyze the two discourses, but from the concepts of controversy and constitutive interincomprehension of discourse. (interdiscourse) that precedes the genesis of the two discourses: theExclusiveDiscourseand the InclusiveDiscourse.As aconstitutionof the archiveanddatabase,wesearchedformaterialmadeavailableontheInternetabout thetwo discursivepositions thatconstituteareligiousdiscourseinthemedia:FolhaFolhaUniversal (Edition1.134from12/29/13to04/01/14, issueofcoverwiththetitle"SomeoneBelievedin them", Issue998of22to18/05/11,coverstorywiththetitle"Youapprove?").ProgramFront withGabi,SBT,on03/02/2013,LucianaGimenez'sSuperpopProgram,RedeTV,onApril 15-13, which interviewed Fr SilasMalafaia,MetropolitanCommunityChurchSites, an inclusivechurchandtheDocumentary,TheSameLove,producedbytheChurchForAll,an inclusivechurch.Theanalysisof thepolemical-religiousstatementsisbasedontranslations andelaborationsofsimulacraof theOther thatareevokedasnegativerecords,theDiscourse of theOther in the discourse of the Same, which characterizes a procedure based on inter-comprehension. The results of the analyzes reveal that the twodiscursivepositions analyzedintheExclusiveDiscourseandtheInclusiveDiscourse,althoughsharingthesame discursive spaceandsharingsimilarglobal semantics, are incontroversial relationbecause theyseektheir legitimacyasavoiceofGod.Thepresentdissertation, althoughitdoesnot exhaust the problematizations about the nature of the controversy established in these discourses, throwsanewlookonthequestion, especially,withrespect tothestudiesof the polemic in defense that the procedure finds its foundation in the interincomprehension.