Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/37793
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorSantos, Dayvid Souza-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-13T12:54:45Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-13T12:54:45Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07-19-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/37793-
dc.description.abstractAssessing the social impact of small and medium-sized biorefinery projects is essential to understanding the relationship between society and these bioindustries. However, one of the main challenges is the application of methods that allow considering quantitative aspects such as cost minimization and qualitative aspects related to social, technological, psychological, cultural factors, among others, that condition the behavior of individuals who live in communities and, will be impacted by intervention projects. In the light of the aforementioned discussion, this study aims to evaluate the social impacts of small and medium-sized biorefineries, based on the selection of technologies for bioactives through a Multicriteria Decision Making Analysis Support Model - MCDA (Multicriteria Decision Making Analysis), with a view to to the human development of the Território Litoral Sul da Bahia - TLS. In this sense, this work contributes to the theme by pointing out evidence on different technological routes that preserve or conserve the Atlantic Forest and, at the same time, establish positive relationships with society. From this premise, the following contributions were presented (i) to evaluate methods and metrics that quantify the social impact of biorefineries; (ii) develop a socioeconomic analysis of TLS cooperatives and family associations; (iii) carries out technological mapping of small family producers in the TLS; (iv) quantify the potential of bioproducts extracted from the Atlantic Forest and the applications of small and medium-sized biorefineries; v) to develop a MCDA model for evaluating the social impact of small and medium-sized biorefineries, considering the different bioactive technologies. The results indicate the existence of a lack of research aimed at investigating the social aspects of small and medium-sized biorefineries. There is a need to analyze the different technological routes for the production of multi-products, as well as pointing out the Hydrodynamic Cavitation and Heterogeneous Catalysis technologies as those that can positively impact social issues in territories and consequently generate new business opportunities and healthy living. It is concluded that the absence of an up-to-date and efficient national policy for the development of technologies, oriented towards the use of biomass, aimed at promoting positive social impacts, has caused the impoverishment of communities as well as a proliferation of work analogous to slavery in the different regions of the country. Therefore, the proposed model can be used by decision makers to simplify the process of evaluating technologies to be used for bioconversion of raw materials into several high value-added products in small and medium-sized biorefineries, as well as being useful to support the implementation of strategies that favor the technological and human development of communities.pt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal da Bahiapt_BR
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/*
dc.subjectImpacto socialpt_BR
dc.subjectBiorrefinariapt_BR
dc.subjectDesenvolvimento Humano do Território Litoral Sul da Bahia (TLS)pt_BR
dc.subjectModelo de Apoio Multicritéio (MCDA)pt_BR
dc.subjectBioprodutospt_BR
dc.subject.otherSocial impactpt_BR
dc.subject.otherBiorefinerypt_BR
dc.subject.otherHuman Development of the Southern Coastal Territory of Bahia (TLS)pt_BR
dc.subject.otherMulti-criteria support model (MCDA)pt_BR
dc.subject.otherBioproductspt_BR
dc.titleAvaliação dos impactos sociais de biorrefinarias de pequeno e médio porte no Território Litoral Sul da Bahia considerando a seleção de tecnologias para bioativos: um modelo MCDApt_BR
dc.title.alternativeEvaluation of the social impacts of small and medium-sized biorefineries in the Território Litoral Sul da Bahia considering the selection of technologies for bioactives: an MCDA modelpt_BR
dc.typeTesept_BR
dc.contributor.refereesMoquete Guzmán, Sócrates Jacobo-
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Industrial (PEI) pt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFBApt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqCNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA DE PRODUCAOpt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Kalid, Ricardo de Araújo-
dc.contributor.advisor1ID0000-0001-9265-5263pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2562159376424787pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Pessoa, Fernando Luiz Pellegrini-
dc.contributor.advisor-co1ID0000-0003-3667-3875pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6669992155373315pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Kalid, Ricardo de Araújo-
dc.contributor.referee1ID0000-0001-9265-5263pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2562159376424787pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Pessoa, Fernando Luiz Pellegrini-
dc.contributor.referee2ID0000-0003-3667-3875pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6669992155373315pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3Calixto, Ewerton Emmanuel da Silva-
dc.contributor.referee3ID0000-0001-6958-8963pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0294075028935389pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee4Belderrain, Mischel Carmen Neyra-
dc.contributor.referee4ID0000-0002-5582-4977pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee4Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3574552458175171pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee5Gusmão, Ana Paula Henriques de-
dc.contributor.referee5ID0000-0001-8353-2499pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee5Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9293245069875867pt_BR
dc.creator.ID0000-0003-1270-7014pt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6122017622317280pt_BR
dc.description.resumoAvaliar o impacto social em projetos de biorrefinarias de pequeno e médio porte é fundamental para compreender as relações entre a sociedade e essas bioindústrias. Porém, um dos principais desafios está na aplicação de métodos que permitem considerar os aspectos quantitativos como minimização de custo e os qualitativos relacionados aos fatores, sociais, tecnológicos, psicológicos, culturais, entre outros que condicionam o comportamento dos indivíduos que vivem em comunidades e, serão impactados por projetos de intervenção. À luz da discussão citada anteriormente, este estudo possui como objetivo avaliar os impactos sociais de pequenas e médias biorrefinarinas, a partir da seleção de tecnologias para bioativos por meio de um Modelo Apoio a Decisão Multicritério – MCDA (Multicriteria Decision Making Analysis), com vista ao desenvolvimento humano do Território Litoral Sul da Bahia - TLS. Nesse sentido, este trabalho contribui no tema ao apontar evidências sobre diversas rotas tecnológicas que preservem ou conservem a Mata Atlântica e ao mesmo tempo estabelece relações positivas com a sociedade. A partir dessa premissa, as seguintes contribuições foram apresentadas (i) avaliar métodos e métricas que quantifiquem o impacto socioal de biorrefinarias; (ii) desenvolver uma análise socieconômica das cooperativas e associações familiares do TLS; (iii) realiza mapeamento tecnológico dos pequenos produtores familiares do TLS; (iv) quantificar o potencial dos bioprodutos extraídos da Mata Atlântica e as aplicações de biorrefinarias de pequeno e médio porte; v) desenvolver um modelo MCDA de avaliação de impacto de sociais de biorrefinarias de pequeno e médio porte, considerando as diversas tecnologias de bioativos. Os resultados apontam a existência de uma carência de pesquisas direcionadas à investigação dos aspectos sociais de biorrefinaria de pequeno e médio porte. Há necessidade de analisar as diferentes rotas tecnológicas para a produção de multiprodutos bem como apontam as tecnologias Cavitação Hidrodinâmica e Catálise Heterogênea como aquelas que podem impactar positivamente em relação as questões sociais em territórios e consequentemente gerar novas oportunidades de negócio e de vida saudável. Conclui-se que a ausência de uma política nacional atualizada e eficiente para o desenvolvimento de tecnologias, orientada para o aproveitamento da biomassa, que visem a promoção dos impactos sociais postivos, tem provocado empobrecimento das comunidades bem como uma proliferação de trabalho analógo ao escravo nas diversas regiões do país. Portanto, o modelo proposto pode ser utilizado por tomadores de decisões para simplificar o processo de avaliação de tecnologias a serem utilizadas para bioconversão de matérias primas em diversos de produtos de alto valor agregado nas pequenas e médias biorefinarias, bem como ser útil para apoiar a implementação de estratégias que favorecem o desenvolvimento tecnológico e humano de comunidades.pt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEscola Politécnicapt_BR
dc.relation.referencesABUABARA, Leila; PAUCAR-CACERES, Alberto. Surveying applications of Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA) from 1989 to 2018. European Journal of Operational Research, [s. l.], v. 292, n. 3, p. 1051–1065, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.032 AGOSTINHO, Feni; ORTEGA, Enrique. Energetic-environmental assessment of a scenario for Brazilian cellulosic ethanol. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s. l.], v. 47, p. 474–489, 2013a. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.025 AGOSTINHO, Feni; ORTEGA, Enrique. Energetic-environmental assessment of a scenario for Brazilian cellulosic ethanol. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s. l.], v. 47, p. 474–489, 2013b. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.025 AHORSU, Richard; CONSTANTI, Magda; MEDINA, Francesc. Recent Impacts of Heterogeneous Catalysis in Biorefineries. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, [s. l.], v. 60, n. 51, p. 18612–18626, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02789 AIT SAIR, Aicha et al. Multicriteria definition of small-scale biorefineries based on a statistical classification. Sustainability (Switzerland), [s. l.], v. 13, n. 13, p. 1–18, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137310 ANTÔNIO, Emerson. Análise das publicações etnobotânicas sobre plantas medicinais da Mata Atlântica na Região Sul do Estado da Bahia , Brasil Analysis of ethnobotanical publications on medicinal plants of the forest Atlantic in the South of Bahia , Brazil. [s. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 115–140, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5935/2446-4775.20160010 ASAITHAMBI, Niveditha et al. Hydrodynamic cavitation and its application in food and beverage industry: A review. Journal of Food Process Engineering, [s. l.], v. 42, n. 5, p. 1–14, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13144 AXELSSON, Lisa et al. Perspective: Jatropha cultivation in southern India: Assessing farmers’ experiences. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 3, p. 246–256, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb BAQUERO, Marcello. A pesquisa quantitativa nas ciências sociais. [s. l.], p. 104, 2009. BAUER, Fredric et al. Technological innovation systems for biorefineries: a review of the literature. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, [s. l.], v. 11, n. 3, p. 534–548, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1767 BELTON, Valerie; STEWART, Theodor J. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4 BEZERRA, Paloma Rayanne Silva; SCHRAMM, Fernando; SCHRAMM, Vanessa Batista. A multicriteria model, based on the PROMETHEE II, for assessing corporate sustainability. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 10, p. 2927–2940, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02211-y BOUYSSOU, Denis. Some remarks on the notion of compensation in MCDM. European Journal of 51 Operational Research, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 1, p. 150–160, 1986. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90167-0 BRANS, Jean-Pierre; DE SMET, Yves. PROMETHEE Methods. In: OPERATIONAL RESEARCH. [S. l.: s. n.], 2016. v. 22, p. 187–219. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_6 BRANS, J.P.; VINCKE, Ph.; MARESCHAL, B. How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method. European Journal of Operational Research, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 2, p. 228–238, 1986. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5 BRIOZO, Rodrigo Amancio; MUSETTI, Marcel Andreotti. Método multicritério de tomada de decisão: Aplicação ao caso da localização espacial de uma Unidade de Pronto Atendimento-UPA 24 h. Gestao e Producao, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 4, p. 805–819, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X975-13 BUDZIANOWSKI, Wojciech M; POSTAWA, Karol. Total Chain Integration of sustainable biorefinery systems. APPLIED ENERGY, [s. l.], v. 184, p. 1432–1446, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.050 CAKO, Elvana et al. Cavitation based cleaner technologies for biodiesel production and processing of hydrocarbon streams: A perspective on key fundamentals, missing process data and economic feasibility – A review. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, [s. l.], v. 88, n. February, p. 106081, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106081 CALLEFI, Mario Henrique Bueno Moreira et al. Technology-enabled capabilities in road freight transportation systems: A multi-method study. Expert Systems with Applications, [s. l.], v. 203, n. July 2021, p. 117497, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117497 CAMPOS, A. C. S. M.; DE ALMEIDA, A. T. A Multicriteria Decision model for managing business processes. In: , 2011. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. [S. l.]: IEEE, 2011. p. 71–75. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2011.6117881 CAO, Yujin et al. Debottlenecking the biological hydrogen production pathway of dark fermentation: insight into the impact of strain improvement. Microbial Cell Factories, [s. l.], v. 21, n. 1, p. 166, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-022-01893-3 CARDOSO, Fernanda; BOMTEMPO, José Vitor; BORSCHIVER, Suzana. Elaboração De Roadmap Tecnológico Para a Produção De Biogás a Partir De Vinhaça. Cadernos de Prospecção, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 3, p. 495–495, 2017. CASTELLO, Fernanda et al. Prospecção tecnológica utilizando análise de patentes e o método AHP: estudo de caso dos materiais de carbono para o setor de defesa. [s. l.], v. 38, 2021. CAVALCANTE, S. A.; ÁVILA, P. E.; SILVA, T. N. ATUAÇÃO DA PETROBRAS NO GERENCIAMENTO DA CADEIA DE SUPRIMENTO PARA A USINA DE BIODIESEL DE QUIXADÁ. Organizações Rurais & Agroindustriais, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 3, p. 277–290, 2014. CAVALCANTI, Marcelo et al. Taxation of automobile fuels in Brazil: Does ethanol need tax incentives to be competitive and if so, to what extent can they be justified by the balance of GHG 52 emissions? Renewable Energy, [s. l.], v. 37, n. 1, p. 9–18, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.005 CLAUSER, Nicolás M. et al. Alternatives of Small-Scale Biorefineries for the Integrated Production of Xylitol from Sugarcane Bagasse. Journal of Renewable Materials, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 139–151, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.7569/JRM.2017.634145 CLAUSER, Nicolás M. et al. Small-sized biorefineries as strategy to add value to sugarcane bagasse. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, [s. l.], v. 107, p. 137–146, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.10.050 CORDEIRO, Claudiney Soares et al. Catalisadores heterogêneos para a produção de monoésteres graxos (biodiesel). Química Nova, [s. l.], v. 34, n. 3, p. 477–486, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422011000300021 CORRÊA, Carla L O et al. Enzymatic Technology Application on Coffee Co ‑ products : A Review. Waste and Biomass Valorization, [s. l.], n. 0123456789, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01208-w CUENYA, Beatriz Roldan. Synthesis and catalytic properties of metal nanoparticles: Size, shape, support, composition, and oxidation state effects. Thin Solid Films, [s. l.], v. 518, n. 12, p. 3127–3150, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2010.01.018 DALFOVO, Michael Samir; LANA, Rogério Adilson; SILVEIRA, Amélia. Métodos Quantitativos e Qualitativos: um Resgate Teórico. Revista Interdisciplinar Científica Aplicada, [s. l.], v. 2, n. 4, p. 1–13, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.unisc.br/portal/upload/com_arquivo/metodos_quantitativos_e_qualitativos_um_resgate_t eorico.pdf DE ALMEIDA, Adiel Teixeira et al. A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: Flexible and interactive tradeoff. European Journal of Operational Research, [s. l.], v. 250, n. 1, p. 179–191, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.058 DE ALMEIDA, Adiel Teixeira et al. A systematic literature review of multicriteria and multi-objective models applied in risk management. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 2, p. 153–184, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpw021 DE ALMEIDA, Adiel Teixeira. Multicriteria model for selection of preventive maintenance intervals. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 6, p. 585–593, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1415 DE ALMEIDA, A.T. Processo de Decisão nas Organizações: Construindo Modelos de Decisão Multicritério. São Paulo: [s. n.], 2013. DE ALMEIDA FILHO, Adiel T. et al. Preference modeling experiments with surrogate weighting procedures for the PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research, [s. l.], v. 264, n. 2, p. 453–461, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.006 DIAKOULAKI, Danae; ANTUNES, Carlos Henggeler; GOMES MARTINS, António. MCDA and 53 Energy Planning. In: MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS: STATE OF THE ART SURVEYS. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2013. p. 859–890. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/0- 387-23081-5_21 DODD, Vanessa; HOOLEY, Tristram; BURKE, Ciaran. Decent work in the UK: Context, conceptualization, and assessment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, [s. l.], v. 112, n. July 2018, p. 270–281, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.04.002 DRESCH, Aline. Desenvolvimento Científico Em Design Science Para a Engenharia De Produção: Formulações Conceituais E Análise Empírica. [s. l.], p. 268, 2018. DU PISANI, Jacobus A.; SANDHAM, Luke A. Assessing the performance of SIA in the EIA context: A case study of South Africa. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 8, p. 707– 724, 2006. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.07.002 DUFFY, Ryan D. et al. The development and initial validation of the Decent Work Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, [s. l.], v. 64, n. 2, p. 206–221, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000191 EISENFÜHR, Franz; WEBER, Martin. Entscheidung bei Risiko und mehreren Zielen. In: [S. l.: s. n.], 1993. p. 255–273. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09670-3_11 ESTEVES, Ana Maria; FRANKS, Daniel; VANCLAY, Frank. Social impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, [s. l.], v. 30, n. 1, p. 34–42, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.660356 ETIKAN, Ilker. Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 1, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 FRANÇA, Márcia et al. Biorefinery Lignin in Brazil Using the Technology Roadmap Method. Energy Science and Technology, [s. l.], n. July, p. 321–348, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326558015 GASPARATOS, A et al. Biofuels in sub-Sahara Africa: Drivers, impacts and priority policy areas. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, [s. l.], v. 45, p. 879–901, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.006 GEORGIOU, Ion. Cognitive Mapping and Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA). Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, [s. l.], 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470400531.eorms0974 GIULIANO, Aristide et al. A novel methodology and technology to promote the social acceptance of biomass power plants avoiding nimby syndrome. Chemical Engineering Transactions, [s. l.], v. 67, n. September, p. 307–312, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3303/cet0918000 GOGATE, Parag R.; PANDIT, Aniruddha B. A review and assessment of hydrodynamic cavitation as a technology for the future. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 1–2, p. 21–27, 2005. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.03.007 54 GONZÁLEZ-GARCÍA, S et al. Environmental life cycle assessment for rapeseed-derived biodiesel. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 1, p. 61–76, 2013. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0444-5 GUAZZELLI, Cauê Sauter; DA CUNHA, Claudio Barbieri. Otimização multicritério para o problema de localização de centros de distribuição de uma empresa com unidade produtiva no Polo Industrial de Manaus. Gestao e Producao, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 3, p. 480–494, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X1980-15 HEIJMAN, Wim; SZABO, Zoltan; VELDHUIZEN, Esther. The Contribution of Biorefineries to Rural Development: The Case of Employment in Hungary. STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, [s. l.], v. 121, n. 1, p. 1–12, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1820 HUGOS, H. M. Essential tools of supply chain management. 3. ed. United States of America: [s. n.], 2011. ISSN 01922262.v. 22 IANDA, Tito Francisco; PADULA, Antonio Domingos. Exploring the Brazilian experience to design and simulate the impacts of a biodiesel program for sub-Saharan countries: The case of Guinea-Bissau. Energy Strategy Reviews, [s. l.], v. 32, p. 100547, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100547 INNOCENZI, Valentina; PRISCIANDARO, Marina. Technical feasibility of biodiesel production from virgin oil and waste cooking oil: Comparison between traditional and innovative process based on hydrodynamic cavitation. Waste Management, [s. l.], v. 122, p. 15–25, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.034 JOGLEKAR, Saurabh N et al. A methodology of evaluating sustainability index of a biomass processing enterprise: a case study of native cow dung–urine biorefinery. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 22, p. 27435–27448, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06309-1 KIRCHER, Manfred. The Emerging Bioeconomy: Industrial Drivers, Global Impact, and International Strategies. Industrial Biotechnology, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. 11–18, 2014. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2014.1500 KOKKINOS, Konstantinos et al. Fuzzy Cognitive Map-Based Modeling of Social Acceptance to Overcome Uncertainties in Establishing Waste Biorefinery Facilities. Frontiers in Energy Research, [s. l.], v. 6, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00112 LEE, Keeheon; JUNG, Hosang. Dynamic semantic network analysis for identifying the concept and scope of social sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s. l.], v. 233, p. 1510–1524, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.390 LEE, Sungjoo; PARK, Yongtae. Customization of technology roadmaps according to roadmapping purposes: Overall process and detailed modules. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [s. l.], v. 72, n. 5, p. 567–583, 2005. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.11.006 LI, Jiao; WANG, Yuan; YAN, Beibei. The hotspots of life cycle assessment for bioenergy: A review by social network analysis. Science of The Total Environment, [s. l.], v. 625, p. 1301–1308, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.030 55 LIMA, Dario Oliveira; SOGABE, Vergílio Prado; CALARGE, Tania Cristina Costa. Uma Análise sobre o Mercado Mundial do Biodiesel. XLVI COngresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administração e Sociologia Rural, [s. l.], v. 1, p. 44–59, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.sober.org.br/palestra/9/718.pdf LOLLI, Francesco et al. Waste treatment: an environmental, economic and social analysis with a new group fuzzy PROMETHEE approach. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 5, p. 1317–1332, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1087-6 LOPES, Tiago F. et al. Techno‐economic and life‐cycle assessments of small‐scale biorefineries for isobutene and xylo‐oligosaccharides production: a comparative study in Portugal and Chile. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 5, p. 1321–1332, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2036 LUIZ FERNANDO BALTAZAR1 et al. Capacitação Em Propriedade Intelectual E Prospecção Tecnológica Por Meio De Patentes: Análise Da Elaboração De Método Inovador. Enpi, [s. l.], p. 67577–67590, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv7n7-166 LUNA, Saionara; MEIRA, Marilena; QUINTELLA, Cristina M. Prospecção Tecnológica De Patentes Para Determinação De Métodos Utilizados Para Analise De Matéria-Prima Na Produção De Biodiesel. Cadernos de Prospecção, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 3, p. 159–167, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.9771/s.cprosp.2012.005.017 MA, Yingqun; LIU, Yu. Turning food waste to energy and resources towards a great environmental and economic sustainability: An innovative integrated biological approach. Biotechnology Advances, [s. l.], v. 37, n. 7, p. 107414, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.06.013 MAKAN, Abdelhadi; FADILI, Ahmed. Sustainability assessment of large-scale composting technologies using PROMETHEE method. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s. l.], v. 261, p. 121244, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121244 MANSO, Daniel Ferreira; SUTERIO, Ricardo; BELDERRAIN, Mischel Carmen Neyra. Estruturação do problema de gerenciamento de desastres do estado de São Paulo por intermédio do método Strategic Options Development and Analysis. Gestão & Produção, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 1, p. 4–16, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X1105-13 MARTINKUS, Natalie et al. Biorefinery site selection using a stepwise biogeophysical and social analysis approach. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, [s. l.], v. 97, p. 139–148, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.12.022 MARTINS, Sara M. et al. An artificial-intelligence-based method for assessing service quality: insights from the prosthodontics sector. Journal of Service Management, [s. l.], v. 31, n. 2, p. 291– 312, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-03-2019-0084 MARTTUNEN, Mika; LIENERT, Judit; BELTON, Valerie. Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations. European Journal of Operational Research, [s. l.], v. 263, n. 1, p. 1–17, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.041 56 MATOS, Florinda; JACINTO, Celeste. Additive manufacturing technology: mapping social impacts. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, [s. l.], v. 30, n. 1, p. 70–97, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-12-2017-0263 MCCORMICK, Kes; BOMB, Christian; DEURWAARDER, Ewout. Governance of biofuels for transport in Europe: lessons from Sweden and the UK. Biofuels, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 3, p. 293–305, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.12.15 MORAIS, Danielle Costa et al. PROMETHEE-ROC Model for Assessing the Readiness of Technology for Generating Energy. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, [s. l.], v. 2015, p. 1–11, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/530615 NICOLESCU, Basarab. Um novo tipo de conhecimento – transdisicplinaridade. Teptrans, [s. l.], p. 1–10, 1999. Disponível em: http://www.ufrrj.br/leptrans/arquivos/conhecimento.pdf NISHIHARA HUN, Andrea Lorena; DANIEL MELE, Fernando; ANTONIO PEREZ, Gonzalo. A comparative life cycle assessment of the sugarcane value chain in the province of Tucuman (Argentina) considering different technology levels. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 4, p. 502–515, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367- 016-1047-3 NUNES, Luane A. et al. Waste green coconut shells: Diagnosis of the disposal and applications for use in other products. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s. l.], v. 255, p. 120169, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120169 PERIMENIS, Anastasios et al. Development of a decision support tool for the assessment of biofuels. Energy Policy, [s. l.], v. 39, n. 3, p. 1782–1793, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.011 PEROBELLI, Fernando Salgueiro et al. Impactos Econômicos do Aumento das Exportações Brasileiras de Produtos Agrícolas e Agroindustriais para Diferentes Destinos. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, [s. l.], v. 55, n. 2, p. 343–366, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1234- 56781806-94790550208 PESSÔA, Luiggi Cavalcanti et al. Technological prospection of microalgae-based biorefinery approach for effluent treatment. Algal Research, [s. l.], v. 60, n. September, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102504 PETERS, Dietmar; ULBER, Roland; WAGEMANN, Kurt. Die deutsche Roadmap: Bioraffinerien. Chemie in Unserer Zeit, [s. l.], v. 48, n. 1, p. 46–59, 2014. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/ciuz.201400622 PONNUSAMY, Vinoth Kumar et al. A review on lignin structure, pretreatments, fermentation reactions and biorefinery potential. Bioresource Technology, [s. l.], v. 271, n. August 2018, p. 462– 472, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.070 PRASARA-A, Jittima et al. Environmental and social life cycle assessment to enhance sustainability of sugarcane-based products in Thailand. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL 57 POLICY, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA, v. 21, n. 7, p. 1447–1458, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01715-y PYRGAKIS, Konstantinos A.; KOKOSSIS, Antonios C. A Total Site Synthesis approach for the selection, integration and planning of multiple-feedstock biorefineries. Computers & Chemical Engineering, [s. l.], v. 122, p. 326–355, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.09.003 QUINTELLA, Cristina M. et al. Technology assessment as a tool applied in science and technology to achieve innovation: Optical methods for fuels quality assessment. Revista Virtual de Quimica, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 5, p. 406–415, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-6835.20110044 R. C. ASSUNÇÃO, Lorena et al. Technology roadmap of renewable natural gas: Identifying trends for research and development to improve biogas upgrading technology management. Applied Energy, [s. l.], v. 292, p. 116849, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116849 RICCIARDI, Maria et al. First Attempt of Glycidol-to-Monoalkyl Glyceryl Ethers Conversion by Acid Heterogeneous Catalysis: Synthesis and Simplified Sustainability Assessment. ChemSusChem, [s. l.], v. 11, n. 11, p. 1829–1837, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201800530 ROY, Bernard. The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods. Theory and Decision, [s. l.], v. 31, n. 1, p. 49–73, 1991. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134132 SAATY, Thomas L. What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process? In: SPRINGER BERLIN HEIDELBERG (org.). Mathematical Models for Decision Support. 1. ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1988. p. 109–121. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83555-1_5 SALVADOR, Guilherme V.; SALIM, Vera Maria M.; TONIOLO, Fabio S. Sustainability assessment of a decentralized green diesel production in small‐scale biorefineries. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 6, p. 1527–1550, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2419 SBARCIOG, Mihaela et al. Design, Implementation and Simulation of a Small-Scale Biorefinery Model. Processes, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 5, p. 829, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10050829 SCHRAMM, Fernando; SCHRAMM, Vanessa B.; AGUIAR, Emerson S. A web-based procedure for student assistance program selection in Brazil. [S. l.: s. n.], 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2017.8123146 SCHRAMM, Vanessa B.; SCHRAMM, Fernando. An Approach for Supporting Problem Structuring in Water Resources Management and Planning. Water Resources Management, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 9, p. 2955–2968, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1966-9 SEBASTIEN, Lea. From NIMBY to enlightened resistance: a framework proposal to decrypt land-use disputes based on a landfill opposition case in France. Local Environment, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 4, p. 461– 477, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2016.1223620 SIMS, Ralph E.H. et al. An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Bioresource Technology, [s. l.], v. 101, n. 6, p. 1570–1580, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.046 58 SOUTO, Luciana Reis Fontinelle et al. Utilization of residue from cassava starch processing for production of fermentable sugar by enzymatic hydrolysis. Food Science and Technology (Brazil), [s. l.], v. 37, n. 1, p. 19–24, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.0023 SOUZA, Alexandre et al. Social life cycle assessment of first and second-generation ethanol production technologies in Brazil. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 3, p. 617–628, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1112-y STEBELEVA, Olesya P.; MINAKOV, Andrey V. Application of Cavitation in Oil Processing: An Overview of Mechanisms and Results of Treatment. ACS Omega, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 47, p. 31411–31420, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c05858 TALUKDER, Byomkesh; HIPEL, Keith W. The PROMETHEE framework for comparing the sustainability of agricultural systems. Resources, [s. l.], v. 7, n. 4, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7040074 TAYLOR, Bron et al. The need for ecocentrism in biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, [s. l.], v. 34, n. 5, p. 1089–1096, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13541 TAYLOR, C. Nicholas; MACKAY, Michael; PERKINS, Harvey C. Social impact assessment and (realist) evaluation: meeting of the methods. [S. l.: s. n.], 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2021.1928425 TEIXEIRA, Luciene Pires. Prospecção Tecnológica: importância, métodos e experiências da Embrapa Cerrados. Embrapa, [s. l.], 2013. Disponível em: https://doi.org/2176-5081 THESIS, Master; AMSTERDAM, Universiteit Van. Assessing the conditions for an effective energy transition. [s. l.], 2019. THOMAS, Huw; TURNBULL, Peter. From horizontal to vertical labour governance: The International Labour Organization (ILO) and decent work in global supply chains. Human Relations, [s. l.], v. 71, n. 4, p. 536–559, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717719994 VAN REE, René et al. Status Report Biorefinery 2007 Colophon Title Status Report Biorefinery 2007. [S. l.: s. n.], 2007. E-book. VANCLAY, Frank. Conceptualising social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 3, p. 183–211, 2002. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00105-6 VANCLAY, Frank et al. Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. International Association for Impact Assessment, [s. l.], v. 1, n. April, p. 98, 2015. VIEGAS, Renan Alves et al. A multi-criteria-based hazard and operability analysis for process safety. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, [s. l.], v. 144, p. 310–321, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.07.034 VIRGINIO CAVALCANTE, C. A.; PIRES FERREIRA, Rodrigo José; DE ALMEIDA, A. T. A preventive maintenance decision model based on multicriteria method PROMETHEE II integrated with Bayesian approach. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, [s. l.], v. 21, n. 4, p. 333–348, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpn017 59 VLACHOKOSTAS, Christos et al. Decision Support System to Implement Units of Alternative Biowaste Treatment for Producing Bioenergy and Boosting Local Bioeconomy. Energies, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 9, p. 2306, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092306 WANG, Yu et al. Impact of the biorefinery size on the logistics of corn stover supply – A scenario analysis. Applied Energy, [s. l.], v. 198, p. 360–376, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.056 YU, Yun et al. Mallee Biomass as a Key Bioenergy Source in Western Australia: Importance of Biomass Supply Chain. Energy & Fuels, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 6, p. 3290–3299, 2009. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1021/ef900103gpt_BR
dc.contributor.refereesLatteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2981039601206887pt_BR
dc.contributor.refereesIDs0000-0002-1778-4441pt_BR
dc.type.degreeDoutoradopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Tese (PEI)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
DAYVID SOUZA SANTOS_TESE_VERSÃOFINAL.pdfTese de doutorado4,44 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons