dc.relation.references | ABUABARA, Leila; PAUCAR-CACERES, Alberto. Surveying applications of Strategic Options
Development and Analysis (SODA) from 1989 to 2018. European Journal of Operational Research,
[s. l.], v. 292, n. 3, p. 1051–1065, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.032
AGOSTINHO, Feni; ORTEGA, Enrique. Energetic-environmental assessment of a scenario for
Brazilian cellulosic ethanol. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s. l.], v. 47, p. 474–489, 2013a.
Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.025
AGOSTINHO, Feni; ORTEGA, Enrique. Energetic-environmental assessment of a scenario for
Brazilian cellulosic ethanol. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s. l.], v. 47, p. 474–489, 2013b.
Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.025
AHORSU, Richard; CONSTANTI, Magda; MEDINA, Francesc. Recent Impacts of Heterogeneous
Catalysis in Biorefineries. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, [s. l.], v. 60, n. 51, p.
18612–18626, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02789
AIT SAIR, Aicha et al. Multicriteria definition of small-scale biorefineries based on a statistical
classification. Sustainability (Switzerland), [s. l.], v. 13, n. 13, p. 1–18, 2021. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137310
ANTÔNIO, Emerson. Análise das publicações etnobotânicas sobre plantas medicinais da Mata
Atlântica na Região Sul do Estado da Bahia , Brasil Analysis of ethnobotanical publications on
medicinal plants of the forest Atlantic in the South of Bahia , Brazil. [s. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 115–140,
2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5935/2446-4775.20160010
ASAITHAMBI, Niveditha et al. Hydrodynamic cavitation and its application in food and beverage
industry: A review. Journal of Food Process Engineering, [s. l.], v. 42, n. 5, p. 1–14, 2019. Disponível
em: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13144
AXELSSON, Lisa et al. Perspective: Jatropha cultivation in southern India: Assessing farmers’
experiences. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 3, p. 246–256, 2012. Disponível
em: https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb
BAQUERO, Marcello. A pesquisa quantitativa nas ciências sociais. [s. l.], p. 104, 2009.
BAUER, Fredric et al. Technological innovation systems for biorefineries: a review of the literature.
Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, [s. l.], v. 11, n. 3, p. 534–548, 2017. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1767
BELTON, Valerie; STEWART, Theodor J. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Boston, MA:
Springer US, 2002. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
BEZERRA, Paloma Rayanne Silva; SCHRAMM, Fernando; SCHRAMM, Vanessa Batista. A
multicriteria model, based on the PROMETHEE II, for assessing corporate sustainability. Clean
Technologies and Environmental Policy, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 10, p. 2927–2940, 2021. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02211-y
BOUYSSOU, Denis. Some remarks on the notion of compensation in MCDM. European Journal of
51
Operational Research, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 1, p. 150–160, 1986. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90167-0
BRANS, Jean-Pierre; DE SMET, Yves. PROMETHEE Methods. In: OPERATIONAL RESEARCH.
[S. l.: s. n.], 2016. v. 22, p. 187–219. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_6
BRANS, J.P.; VINCKE, Ph.; MARESCHAL, B. How to select and how to rank projects: The
Promethee method. European Journal of Operational Research, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 2, p. 228–238, 1986.
Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5
BRIOZO, Rodrigo Amancio; MUSETTI, Marcel Andreotti. Método multicritério de tomada de
decisão: Aplicação ao caso da localização espacial de uma Unidade de Pronto Atendimento-UPA 24
h. Gestao e Producao, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 4, p. 805–819, 2015. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X975-13
BUDZIANOWSKI, Wojciech M; POSTAWA, Karol. Total Chain Integration of sustainable
biorefinery systems. APPLIED ENERGY, [s. l.], v. 184, p. 1432–1446, 2016. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.050
CAKO, Elvana et al. Cavitation based cleaner technologies for biodiesel production and processing of
hydrocarbon streams: A perspective on key fundamentals, missing process data and economic
feasibility – A review. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, [s. l.], v. 88, n. February, p. 106081, 2022.
Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106081
CALLEFI, Mario Henrique Bueno Moreira et al. Technology-enabled capabilities in road freight
transportation systems: A multi-method study. Expert Systems with Applications, [s. l.], v. 203, n.
July 2021, p. 117497, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117497
CAMPOS, A. C. S. M.; DE ALMEIDA, A. T. A Multicriteria Decision model for managing business
processes. In: , 2011. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and
Engineering Management. [S. l.]: IEEE, 2011. p. 71–75. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2011.6117881
CAO, Yujin et al. Debottlenecking the biological hydrogen production pathway of dark fermentation:
insight into the impact of strain improvement. Microbial Cell Factories, [s. l.], v. 21, n. 1, p. 166,
2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-022-01893-3
CARDOSO, Fernanda; BOMTEMPO, José Vitor; BORSCHIVER, Suzana. Elaboração De Roadmap
Tecnológico Para a Produção De Biogás a Partir De Vinhaça. Cadernos de Prospecção, [s. l.], v. 10,
n. 3, p. 495–495, 2017.
CASTELLO, Fernanda et al. Prospecção tecnológica utilizando análise de patentes e o método AHP:
estudo de caso dos materiais de carbono para o setor de defesa. [s. l.], v. 38, 2021.
CAVALCANTE, S. A.; ÁVILA, P. E.; SILVA, T. N. ATUAÇÃO DA PETROBRAS NO
GERENCIAMENTO DA CADEIA DE SUPRIMENTO PARA A USINA DE BIODIESEL DE
QUIXADÁ. Organizações Rurais & Agroindustriais, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 3, p. 277–290, 2014.
CAVALCANTI, Marcelo et al. Taxation of automobile fuels in Brazil: Does ethanol need tax
incentives to be competitive and if so, to what extent can they be justified by the balance of GHG
52
emissions? Renewable Energy, [s. l.], v. 37, n. 1, p. 9–18, 2012. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.005
CLAUSER, Nicolás M. et al. Alternatives of Small-Scale Biorefineries for the Integrated Production
of Xylitol from Sugarcane Bagasse. Journal of Renewable Materials, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 139–151,
2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.7569/JRM.2017.634145
CLAUSER, Nicolás M. et al. Small-sized biorefineries as strategy to add value to sugarcane bagasse.
Chemical Engineering Research and Design, [s. l.], v. 107, p. 137–146, 2016. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.10.050
CORDEIRO, Claudiney Soares et al. Catalisadores heterogêneos para a produção de monoésteres
graxos (biodiesel). Química Nova, [s. l.], v. 34, n. 3, p. 477–486, 2011. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422011000300021
CORRÊA, Carla L O et al. Enzymatic Technology Application on Coffee Co ‑ products : A Review.
Waste and Biomass Valorization, [s. l.], n. 0123456789, 2020. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01208-w
CUENYA, Beatriz Roldan. Synthesis and catalytic properties of metal nanoparticles: Size, shape,
support, composition, and oxidation state effects. Thin Solid Films, [s. l.], v. 518, n. 12, p. 3127–3150,
2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2010.01.018
DALFOVO, Michael Samir; LANA, Rogério Adilson; SILVEIRA, Amélia. Métodos Quantitativos e
Qualitativos: um Resgate Teórico. Revista Interdisciplinar Científica Aplicada, [s. l.], v. 2, n. 4, p.
1–13, 2008. Disponível em:
http://www.unisc.br/portal/upload/com_arquivo/metodos_quantitativos_e_qualitativos_um_resgate_t
eorico.pdf
DE ALMEIDA, Adiel Teixeira et al. A new method for elicitation of criteria
weights in additive models: Flexible and interactive tradeoff. European Journal of Operational
Research, [s. l.], v. 250, n. 1, p. 179–191, 2016. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.058
DE ALMEIDA, Adiel Teixeira et al. A systematic literature review of multicriteria and multi-objective
models applied in risk management. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 2,
p. 153–184, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpw021
DE ALMEIDA, Adiel Teixeira. Multicriteria model for selection of preventive maintenance intervals.
Quality and Reliability Engineering International, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 6, p. 585–593, 2012. Disponível
em: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1415
DE ALMEIDA, A.T. Processo de Decisão nas Organizações: Construindo Modelos de Decisão
Multicritério. São Paulo: [s. n.], 2013.
DE ALMEIDA FILHO, Adiel T. et al. Preference modeling experiments with surrogate weighting
procedures for the PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research, [s. l.], v.
264, n. 2, p. 453–461, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.006
DIAKOULAKI, Danae; ANTUNES, Carlos Henggeler; GOMES MARTINS, António. MCDA and
53
Energy Planning. In: MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS: STATE OF THE ART
SURVEYS. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2013. p. 859–890. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-
387-23081-5_21
DODD, Vanessa; HOOLEY, Tristram; BURKE, Ciaran. Decent work in the UK: Context,
conceptualization, and assessment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, [s. l.], v. 112, n. July 2018, p.
270–281, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.04.002
DRESCH, Aline. Desenvolvimento Científico Em Design Science Para a Engenharia De Produção:
Formulações Conceituais E Análise Empírica. [s. l.], p. 268, 2018.
DU PISANI, Jacobus A.; SANDHAM, Luke A. Assessing the performance of SIA in the EIA context:
A case study of South Africa. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 8, p. 707–
724, 2006. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.07.002
DUFFY, Ryan D. et al. The development and initial validation of the Decent Work Scale. Journal of
Counseling Psychology, [s. l.], v. 64, n. 2, p. 206–221, 2017. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000191
EISENFÜHR, Franz; WEBER, Martin. Entscheidung bei Risiko und mehreren Zielen. In: [S. l.: s. n.],
1993. p. 255–273. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09670-3_11
ESTEVES, Ana Maria; FRANKS, Daniel; VANCLAY, Frank. Social impact assessment: The state of
the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, [s. l.], v. 30, n. 1, p. 34–42, 2012. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.660356
ETIKAN, Ilker. Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal
of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 1, 2016. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
FRANÇA, Márcia et al. Biorefinery Lignin in Brazil Using the Technology Roadmap Method. Energy
Science and Technology, [s. l.], n. July, p. 321–348, 2018. Disponível em:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326558015
GASPARATOS, A et al. Biofuels in sub-Sahara Africa: Drivers, impacts and priority policy areas.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, [s. l.], v. 45, p. 879–901, 2015. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.006
GEORGIOU, Ion. Cognitive Mapping and Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA).
Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, [s. l.], 2011. Disponível
em: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470400531.eorms0974
GIULIANO, Aristide et al. A novel methodology and technology to promote the social acceptance of
biomass power plants avoiding nimby syndrome. Chemical Engineering Transactions, [s. l.], v. 67,
n. September, p. 307–312, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3303/cet0918000
GOGATE, Parag R.; PANDIT, Aniruddha B. A review and assessment of hydrodynamic cavitation as
a technology for the future. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 1–2, p. 21–27, 2005.
Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.03.007
54
GONZÁLEZ-GARCÍA, S et al. Environmental life cycle assessment for rapeseed-derived biodiesel.
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 1, p. 61–76, 2013. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0444-5
GUAZZELLI, Cauê Sauter; DA CUNHA, Claudio Barbieri. Otimização multicritério para o problema
de localização de centros de distribuição de uma empresa com unidade produtiva no Polo Industrial de
Manaus. Gestao e Producao, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 3, p. 480–494, 2015. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X1980-15
HEIJMAN, Wim; SZABO, Zoltan; VELDHUIZEN, Esther. The Contribution of Biorefineries to Rural
Development: The Case of Employment in Hungary. STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL
ECONOMICS, [s. l.], v. 121, n. 1, p. 1–12, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1820
HUGOS, H. M. Essential tools of supply chain management. 3. ed. United States of America: [s.
n.], 2011. ISSN 01922262.v. 22
IANDA, Tito Francisco; PADULA, Antonio Domingos. Exploring the Brazilian experience to design
and simulate the impacts of a biodiesel program for sub-Saharan countries: The case of Guinea-Bissau.
Energy Strategy Reviews, [s. l.], v. 32, p. 100547, 2020. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100547
INNOCENZI, Valentina; PRISCIANDARO, Marina. Technical feasibility of biodiesel production
from virgin oil and waste cooking oil: Comparison between traditional and innovative process based
on hydrodynamic cavitation. Waste Management, [s. l.], v. 122, p. 15–25, 2021. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.034
JOGLEKAR, Saurabh N et al. A methodology of evaluating sustainability index of a biomass
processing enterprise: a case study of native cow dung–urine biorefinery. Environmental Science and
Pollution Research, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 22, p. 27435–27448, 2020. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06309-1
KIRCHER, Manfred. The Emerging Bioeconomy: Industrial Drivers, Global Impact, and International
Strategies. Industrial Biotechnology, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. 11–18, 2014. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2014.1500
KOKKINOS, Konstantinos et al. Fuzzy Cognitive Map-Based Modeling of Social Acceptance to
Overcome Uncertainties in Establishing Waste Biorefinery Facilities. Frontiers in Energy Research,
[s. l.], v. 6, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00112
LEE, Keeheon; JUNG, Hosang. Dynamic semantic network analysis for identifying the concept and
scope of social sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s. l.], v. 233, p. 1510–1524, 2019.
Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.390
LEE, Sungjoo; PARK, Yongtae. Customization of technology roadmaps according to roadmapping
purposes: Overall process and detailed modules. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [s.
l.], v. 72, n. 5, p. 567–583, 2005. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.11.006
LI, Jiao; WANG, Yuan; YAN, Beibei. The hotspots of life cycle assessment for bioenergy: A review
by social network analysis. Science of The Total Environment, [s. l.], v. 625, p. 1301–1308, 2018.
Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.030
55
LIMA, Dario Oliveira; SOGABE, Vergílio Prado; CALARGE, Tania Cristina Costa. Uma Análise
sobre o Mercado Mundial do Biodiesel. XLVI COngresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia,
Administração e Sociologia Rural, [s. l.], v. 1, p. 44–59, 2008. Disponível em:
http://www.sober.org.br/palestra/9/718.pdf
LOLLI, Francesco et al. Waste treatment: an environmental, economic and social analysis with a new
group fuzzy PROMETHEE approach. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, [s. l.], v. 18,
n. 5, p. 1317–1332, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1087-6
LOPES, Tiago F. et al. Techno‐economic and life‐cycle assessments of small‐scale biorefineries for
isobutene and xylo‐oligosaccharides production: a comparative study in Portugal and Chile. Biofuels,
Bioproducts and Biorefining, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 5, p. 1321–1332, 2019. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2036
LUIZ FERNANDO BALTAZAR1 et al. Capacitação Em Propriedade Intelectual E Prospecção
Tecnológica Por Meio De Patentes: Análise Da Elaboração De Método Inovador. Enpi, [s. l.], p.
67577–67590, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv7n7-166
LUNA, Saionara; MEIRA, Marilena; QUINTELLA, Cristina M. Prospecção Tecnológica De Patentes
Para Determinação De Métodos Utilizados Para Analise De Matéria-Prima Na Produção De Biodiesel.
Cadernos de Prospecção, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 3, p. 159–167, 2012. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.9771/s.cprosp.2012.005.017
MA, Yingqun; LIU, Yu. Turning food waste to energy and resources towards a great environmental
and economic sustainability: An innovative integrated biological approach. Biotechnology Advances,
[s. l.], v. 37, n. 7, p. 107414, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.06.013
MAKAN, Abdelhadi; FADILI, Ahmed. Sustainability assessment of large-scale composting
technologies using PROMETHEE method. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s. l.], v. 261, p. 121244,
2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121244
MANSO, Daniel Ferreira; SUTERIO, Ricardo; BELDERRAIN, Mischel Carmen Neyra. Estruturação
do problema de gerenciamento de desastres do estado de São Paulo por intermédio do método Strategic
Options Development and Analysis. Gestão & Produção, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 1, p. 4–16, 2015. Disponível
em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X1105-13
MARTINKUS, Natalie et al. Biorefinery site selection using a stepwise biogeophysical and social
analysis approach. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, [s. l.], v. 97, p. 139–148, 2017. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.12.022
MARTINS, Sara M. et al. An artificial-intelligence-based method for assessing service quality:
insights from the prosthodontics sector. Journal of Service Management, [s. l.], v. 31, n. 2, p. 291–
312, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-03-2019-0084
MARTTUNEN, Mika; LIENERT, Judit; BELTON, Valerie. Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria
Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations. European Journal of
Operational Research, [s. l.], v. 263, n. 1, p. 1–17, 2017. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.041
56
MATOS, Florinda; JACINTO, Celeste. Additive manufacturing technology: mapping social impacts.
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, [s. l.], v. 30, n. 1, p. 70–97, 2019. Disponível
em: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-12-2017-0263
MCCORMICK, Kes; BOMB, Christian; DEURWAARDER, Ewout. Governance of biofuels for
transport in Europe: lessons from Sweden and the UK. Biofuels, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 3, p. 293–305, 2012.
Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.12.15
MORAIS, Danielle Costa et al. PROMETHEE-ROC Model for Assessing the Readiness of
Technology for Generating Energy. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, [s. l.], v. 2015, p. 1–11,
2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/530615
NICOLESCU, Basarab. Um novo tipo de conhecimento – transdisicplinaridade. Teptrans, [s. l.], p.
1–10, 1999. Disponível em: http://www.ufrrj.br/leptrans/arquivos/conhecimento.pdf
NISHIHARA HUN, Andrea Lorena; DANIEL MELE, Fernando; ANTONIO PEREZ, Gonzalo. A
comparative life cycle assessment of the sugarcane value chain in the province of Tucuman (Argentina)
considering different technology levels. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE
ASSESSMENT, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 4, p. 502–515, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-
016-1047-3
NUNES, Luane A. et al. Waste green coconut shells: Diagnosis of the disposal and applications for
use in other products. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s. l.], v. 255, p. 120169, 2020. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120169
PERIMENIS, Anastasios et al. Development of a decision support tool for the assessment of biofuels.
Energy Policy, [s. l.], v. 39, n. 3, p. 1782–1793, 2011. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.011
PEROBELLI, Fernando Salgueiro et al. Impactos Econômicos do Aumento das Exportações
Brasileiras de Produtos Agrícolas e Agroindustriais para Diferentes Destinos. Revista de Economia e
Sociologia Rural, [s. l.], v. 55, n. 2, p. 343–366, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1234-
56781806-94790550208
PESSÔA, Luiggi Cavalcanti et al. Technological prospection of microalgae-based biorefinery
approach for effluent treatment. Algal Research, [s. l.], v. 60, n. September, 2021. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102504
PETERS, Dietmar; ULBER, Roland; WAGEMANN, Kurt. Die deutsche Roadmap: Bioraffinerien.
Chemie in Unserer Zeit, [s. l.], v. 48, n. 1, p. 46–59, 2014. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1002/ciuz.201400622
PONNUSAMY, Vinoth Kumar et al. A review on lignin structure, pretreatments, fermentation
reactions and biorefinery potential. Bioresource Technology, [s. l.], v. 271, n. August 2018, p. 462–
472, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.070
PRASARA-A, Jittima et al. Environmental and social life cycle assessment to enhance sustainability
of sugarcane-based products in Thailand. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL
57
POLICY, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA, v. 21, n. 7, p. 1447–1458, 2019.
Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01715-y
PYRGAKIS, Konstantinos A.; KOKOSSIS, Antonios C. A Total Site Synthesis approach for the
selection, integration and planning of multiple-feedstock biorefineries. Computers & Chemical
Engineering, [s. l.], v. 122, p. 326–355, 2019. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.09.003
QUINTELLA, Cristina M. et al. Technology assessment as a tool applied in science and technology to
achieve innovation: Optical methods for fuels quality assessment. Revista Virtual de Quimica, [s. l.],
v. 3, n. 5, p. 406–415, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-6835.20110044
R. C. ASSUNÇÃO, Lorena et al. Technology roadmap of renewable natural gas: Identifying trends for
research and development to improve biogas upgrading technology management. Applied Energy, [s.
l.], v. 292, p. 116849, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116849
RICCIARDI, Maria et al. First Attempt of Glycidol-to-Monoalkyl Glyceryl Ethers Conversion by Acid
Heterogeneous Catalysis: Synthesis and Simplified Sustainability Assessment. ChemSusChem, [s. l.],
v. 11, n. 11, p. 1829–1837, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201800530
ROY, Bernard. The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods. Theory and
Decision, [s. l.], v. 31, n. 1, p. 49–73, 1991. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134132
SAATY, Thomas L. What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process? In: SPRINGER BERLIN HEIDELBERG
(org.). Mathematical Models for Decision Support. 1. ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin
Heidelberg, 1988. p. 109–121. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83555-1_5
SALVADOR, Guilherme V.; SALIM, Vera Maria M.; TONIOLO, Fabio S. Sustainability assessment
of a decentralized green diesel production in small‐scale biorefineries. Biofuels, Bioproducts and
Biorefining, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 6, p. 1527–1550, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2419
SBARCIOG, Mihaela et al. Design, Implementation and Simulation of a Small-Scale Biorefinery
Model. Processes, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 5, p. 829, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10050829
SCHRAMM, Fernando; SCHRAMM, Vanessa B.; AGUIAR, Emerson S. A web-based procedure
for student assistance program selection in Brazil. [S. l.: s. n.], 2017. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2017.8123146
SCHRAMM, Vanessa B.; SCHRAMM, Fernando. An Approach for Supporting Problem Structuring
in Water Resources Management and Planning. Water Resources Management, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 9, p.
2955–2968, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1966-9
SEBASTIEN, Lea. From NIMBY to enlightened resistance: a framework proposal to decrypt land-use
disputes based on a landfill opposition case in France. Local Environment, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 4, p. 461–
477, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2016.1223620
SIMS, Ralph E.H. et al. An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Bioresource
Technology, [s. l.], v. 101, n. 6, p. 1570–1580, 2010. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.046
58
SOUTO, Luciana Reis Fontinelle et al. Utilization of residue from cassava starch processing for
production of fermentable sugar by enzymatic hydrolysis. Food Science and Technology (Brazil), [s.
l.], v. 37, n. 1, p. 19–24, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.0023
SOUZA, Alexandre et al. Social life cycle assessment of first and second-generation ethanol
production technologies in Brazil. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, [s. l.], v. 23,
n. 3, p. 617–628, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1112-y
STEBELEVA, Olesya P.; MINAKOV, Andrey V. Application of Cavitation in Oil Processing: An
Overview of Mechanisms and Results of Treatment. ACS Omega, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 47, p. 31411–31420,
2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c05858
TALUKDER, Byomkesh; HIPEL, Keith W. The PROMETHEE framework for comparing the
sustainability of agricultural systems. Resources, [s. l.], v. 7, n. 4, 2018. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7040074
TAYLOR, Bron et al. The need for ecocentrism in biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology,
[s. l.], v. 34, n. 5, p. 1089–1096, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13541
TAYLOR, C. Nicholas; MACKAY, Michael; PERKINS, Harvey C. Social impact assessment and
(realist) evaluation: meeting of the methods. [S. l.: s. n.], 2021. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2021.1928425
TEIXEIRA, Luciene Pires. Prospecção Tecnológica: importância, métodos e experiências da Embrapa
Cerrados. Embrapa, [s. l.], 2013. Disponível em: https://doi.org/2176-5081
THESIS, Master; AMSTERDAM, Universiteit Van. Assessing the conditions for an effective energy
transition. [s. l.], 2019.
THOMAS, Huw; TURNBULL, Peter. From horizontal to vertical labour governance: The
International Labour Organization (ILO) and decent work in global supply chains. Human Relations,
[s. l.], v. 71, n. 4, p. 536–559, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717719994
VAN REE, René et al. Status Report Biorefinery 2007 Colophon Title Status Report Biorefinery
2007. [S. l.: s. n.], 2007. E-book.
VANCLAY, Frank. Conceptualising social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, [s.
l.], v. 22, n. 3, p. 183–211, 2002. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00105-6
VANCLAY, Frank et al. Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for assessing and managing the social
impacts of projects. International Association for Impact Assessment, [s. l.], v. 1, n. April, p. 98,
2015.
VIEGAS, Renan Alves et al. A multi-criteria-based hazard and operability analysis for process safety.
Process Safety and Environmental Protection, [s. l.], v. 144, p. 310–321, 2020. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.07.034
VIRGINIO CAVALCANTE, C. A.; PIRES FERREIRA, Rodrigo José; DE ALMEIDA, A. T. A
preventive maintenance decision model based on multicriteria method PROMETHEE II integrated
with Bayesian approach. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, [s. l.], v. 21, n. 4, p. 333–348,
2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpn017
59
VLACHOKOSTAS, Christos et al. Decision Support System to Implement Units of Alternative
Biowaste Treatment for Producing Bioenergy and Boosting Local Bioeconomy. Energies, [s. l.], v. 13,
n. 9, p. 2306, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092306
WANG, Yu et al. Impact of the biorefinery size on the logistics of corn stover supply – A scenario
analysis. Applied Energy, [s. l.], v. 198, p. 360–376, 2017. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.056
YU, Yun et al. Mallee Biomass as a Key Bioenergy Source in Western Australia: Importance of
Biomass Supply Chain. Energy & Fuels, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 6, p. 3290–3299, 2009. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef900103g | pt_BR |