Reforma administrativa

Abstract

This live is part of the Information Records project: dialogues between Librarianship, Archival Science and Information Science (CI); coordinated by the Superintendent of the University Library System (SIBI/UFBA), professor Ivana Borges Lins, in partnership with the Information Science Institute (ICI)/UFBA. In celebration of public server day, October 28, 2020, guests Prof. João Carlos Salles (Rector of UFBA) and Prof. Denise Vieira (Pro-Rector for People Development at UFBA) spoke about the administrative reform (Proposal for Amendment to the Constitution/PEC 32). Prof. Denise Vieira started the lecture from three questions: what is administrative reform? What did she come for? What will change in the lives of public servants? He defined the theme as a set of rules that changes the management of people, the management of the public sector, mainly the essence of the functioning of the State, focusing on the Single Legal Regime (RJU), on stability and being a bridge to the private sector. By extinguishing the RJU, fragmenting the workforce in the following links: it restricts stability, withdraws rights and benefits, encourages the transfer of public services to the private sector, expands the power of the Executive to change positions, bodies and autarchies, in this way the reform affects active workers, retirees, pensioners in addition to reaching the general population with regard to service provision. Denise Vieira cited PEC 187, PEC 188 and other factors that lead to the extinction of the role of the Brazilian State. She pointed out the true purpose of this reform (ideologically) and explained the ''arguments'' (false reasons) contained in the text of PEC 32, spoke of the relevance of the SUS, especially in the pandemic moment. In addition to addressing other issues related to the subject, she pointed to the dissemination of critical knowledge of the reform as a way of defending the server and the public service. Prof. João Carlos Salles, when addressing the subject, spoke about the negative image imposed on public servants, of the State's commitment to the values ​​of the common good. He highlighted the University as a particular kind of public service, a special space for having autonomy and defended its protection of what is proposed in PEC 32. Within this institution, he highlighted libraries, citing them as examples of what university life is. He cited the fundamental values ​​from the point of view of teachers, administrative technicians, and explained the importance of stability. Despite the fact that some servers have behaviors that do not match the purpose of the institution, the dean stressed that the truth of the university is: collaboration, knowledge, reception, science, culture, art and said that every university community must mobilize and resist obscurantism, threatening authoritarianism.