Skip navigation
Universidade Federal da Bahia |
Repositório Institucional da UFBA
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/35092
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorFagundes, Marcus Vinicius Carvalho-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-12T19:30:39Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-12T19:30:39Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-19-
dc.identifier.citationFagundes, Marcus Vinicius Carvalho. Modelagem da Gestão de Riscos da Cadeia de Suprimentos na indústria de petróleo e gás. 2021. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Industrial) – Escola Politécnica, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, 2021.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/35092-
dc.description.abstractSupply chains operate as silent engines that drive economic globalization. There is a broad consensus in the literature and in professional practice that supply chains are increasingly complex and vulnerable to risks that cause disturbances, disruptions, and critical reactions from society. This thesis it is aimed to analyze the opportunities and limitations of a modeling based on Multicriteria Decision-Making/Aiding/Analysis and Artificial Intelligence (MCDM/A-AI) for Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM), developed through systematic selection, validation, and system testing of the hybrid Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method applied in the oil and natural gas industry. Specifically, it is sought to: a. carry out the state of the art by a systematic review of the literature network on the SCRM Modeling (SCRMM); b. propose and validate a new computational system for supplier selection considering risks, based on the Fuzzy AHP method [Fuzzy Extended AHP algorithm (FEAHP)]; and, c. propose and systematically test a holistic framework for assessment of typical and sustainable risks [multidimensional risks] of the supply chain with computational support of the Fuzzy AHP method [FEAHP algorithm]. To do so, an applied research is conducted, with exploratory, descriptive, and predictive purposes, of combined approach [qualitative and quantitative], using literature research, theoretical and conceptual development, modeling, and case studies. The prospection of the state of the art in SCRMM, carried out with the use of bibliometric methods and tools, makes it possible to establish a systemic understanding of the flow of research in the field over time, providing future research directions. The analysis and interpretation of research gaps and trends, applied in the field, allow the identification, selection, and systematic implementation of the proposed conceptual, mathematical, and computational modeling. In turn, the proposition and validation of a new computational system for supplier selection based on the FEAHP method constitutes a proof of concept to verify the feasibility of implementing the SCRMM. Based on the case study of an oil and natural gas company with onshore assets, it is found that the FEAHP computational modeling is able to automate the supplier selection process in a rational, flexible and agile way, meeting all the necessary performance requirements, thus promoting the choice of the best suppliers in an environment of risk and uncertainty. After the validation of the developed software, the proposition and system test of a holistic framework for multidimensional risk assessment of the supply chain with computational support of the FEAHP method is performed. Based on a multiple case study of ten oil and natural gas companies with onshore operations, it is found that the results of risk identification and assessment subsidize the creation of risk mitigation and control strategies [predictive action versus proactive action], fostering the development of a Supply Chain Risk Management System (SCRMS). Finally, the results of the system test of the FEAHP tool show that all its elements combine correctly and present an overall performance effectively applicable, promoting in an integral, flexible, failure-free, and/or error-free way the improvement of the Supply Chain Risk Assessment (SCRA). It is concluded that the various opportunities and/or potentialities of using an MCDM/A-AI based SCRMM overtake the main limitations and/or challenges. Despite the restrictions, it is fair to assume that it contributes to the fertile field of research and professional practice of SCRM, SCRMM, and SCRA, promoting the improvement of the design, understanding, reflection, and professional practice of Supply Chain Network and Operations Management.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipOUTRASpt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal da Bahiapt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectMulticriteria decision-making/aiding/analysispt_BR
dc.subjectInteligência artificialpt_BR
dc.subjectRiscos de seleção de fornecedorpt_BR
dc.subjectAvaliação de riscos da cadeia de suprimentospt_BR
dc.subjectSistema de gestão de riscos da cadeia de suprimentospt_BR
dc.subject.otherMulticriteria Decision-Making/Aiding/Analysispt_BR
dc.subject.otherArtificial Intelligencept_BR
dc.subject.otherSupplier Selection Riskspt_BR
dc.subject.otherSupply Chain Risk Assessmentpt_BR
dc.subject.otherSupply Chain Risk Managementpt_BR
dc.titleModelagem da gestão de riscos da cadeia de suprimentos na indústria de petróleo e gáspt_BR
dc.title.alternativeSupply Chain Risk Management Modeling in the oil and gas industrypt_BR
dc.typeTesept_BR
dc.contributor.refereesMagalhães, Robson da Silva-
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Industrial (PEI) pt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFBApt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqCNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA DE PRODUCAO::GERENCIA DE PRODUCAO::SUPRIMENTOSpt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Freires, Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça-
dc.contributor.advisor1ID0000-0001-9622-8242pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1142985064644372pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Vieira de Melo, Silvio Alexandre Beisl-
dc.contributor.advisor-co1ID0000-0002-8617-3724pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9170893104155674pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Freires, Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça-
dc.contributor.referee1ID0000-0001-9622-8242pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1142985064644372pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Vieira de Melo, Silvio Alexandre Beisl-
dc.contributor.referee2ID0000-0002-8617-3724pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9170893104155674pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3Silvestre, Bruno dos Santos-
dc.contributor.referee3ID0000-0002-1657-7555pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2993819237266562pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee4Lima Neto, Fernando Buarque de-
dc.contributor.referee4ID0000-0003-1200-225Xpt_BR
dc.contributor.referee4Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5175924818753829pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee5Costa, Helder Gomes-
dc.contributor.referee5ID0000-0001-9945-0367pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee5Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4524868466523562pt_BR
dc.creator.ID0000-0001-6312-0956pt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7370848771345938pt_BR
dc.description.resumoAs cadeias de suprimentos operam como motores silenciosos que impulsionam a globalização econômica. Há um amplo consenso na literatura e na prática profissional de que as cadeias de suprimentos estão cada vez mais complexas e vulneráveis a riscos que provocam distúrbios, interrupções e reações críticas da sociedade. Nesta tese, objetiva-se analisar as oportunidades e limitações de uma modelagem baseada em Multicriteria Decision-Making/Aiding/Analysis e Inteligência Artificial (MCDM/A-IA) para a Gestão de Riscos da Cadeia de Suprimentos (GRCS), desenvolvida através de seleção sistemática, validação e teste de sistema do método híbrido Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) aplicado na indústria de petróleo e gás natural. Especificamente, busca-se: a. realizar o estado da arte pela revisão sistemática da rede de literatura sobre a Modelagem da GRCS (MGRCS); b. propor e validar um novo sistema computacional para seleção de fornecedor considerando riscos, baseado no método Fuzzy AHP [algoritmo Fuzzy Extended AHP (FEAHP)]; e, c. propor e testar sistemicamente uma estrutura holística para avaliação de riscos típicos e sustentáveis [riscos multidimensionais] da cadeia de suprimentos com suporte computacional do método Fuzzy AHP [algoritmo FEAHP]. Para tanto, é realizada uma pesquisa aplicada, com fins exploratório, descritivo e preditivo, de abordagem combinada [qualitativa e quantitativa], utilizando-se da pesquisa bibliográfica, desenvolvimento teórico-conceitual, modelagem e estudo de casos. A prospecção do estado da arte na MGRCS, realizada com o uso de métodos e ferramentas bibliométricas, possibilita estabelecer uma compreensão sistêmica do fluxo de pesquisa no campo ao longo do tempo, fornecendo as direções para investigações futuras. A análise e interpretação das lacunas e tendências de pesquisa, aplicadas ao campo, permitem a identificação, seleção e implementação sistemática da modelagem conceitual, matemática e computacional proposta. Por sua vez, a proposição e validação de um novo sistema computacional para seleção de fornecedor baseado no método FEAHP constitui uma prova de conceito para verificar a viabilidade de implementação da MGRCS. A partir do estudo de caso de uma empresa de petróleo e gás natural com ativos onshore, é constatado que a modelagem computacional FEAHP é capaz de automatizar o processo de seleção de fornecedor de forma racional, flexível e ágil, atendendo a todos os requisitos de desempenho necessários, promovendo, assim, a escolha dos melhores fornecedores em um ambiente de risco e incerteza. Após a validação do software desenvolvido, é realizada a proposição e teste de sistema de um framework holístico para avaliação de riscos multidimensionais da cadeia de suprimentos com suporte computacional do método FEAHP. Pelo estudo de casos múltiplos de dez empresas de petróleo e gás natural com atuação onshore, constata-se que os resultados da identificação e avaliação de riscos subsidiam a criação de estratégias de mitigação e controle de riscos [ação preditiva versus ação proativa], fomentando o desenvolvimento de um Sistema de Gestão de Riscos da Cadeia de Suprimentos (SGRCS). Finalmente, os resultados do teste de sistema da ferramenta FEAHP mostram que todos os seus elementos combinam-se corretamente e apresentam um desempenho global efetivamente aplicável, promovendo de forma íntegra, flexível, sem falhas e/ou erros a melhoria da Avaliação de Riscos da Cadeia de Suprimentos (ARCS). Conclui-se que as diversas oportunidades e/ou potencialidades de uso de uma MGRCS baseada em MCDM/A-IA superam as principais limitações e/ou desafios. Não obstante as restrições, admite-se que ela contribua com o fértil campo de pesquisa e prática profissional da GRCS, MGRCS e ARCS, promovendo a melhoria da concepção, compreensão, reflexão e do exercício da Gestão de Redes de Suprimentos e Operações.pt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEscola Politécnicapt_BR
dc.relation.referencesABDEL-BASSET, M. et al. A framework for risk assessment, management and evaluation: Economic tool for quantifying risks in supply chain. Fut. Gen. Comp. Syst., v. 90, p. 489-502, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2018.08.035. ACKOFF, R.L.; SASIENI, M. W. Fundamentais of operations research. New York: John Wiley, 1968, p. 468. AGCS - Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty. 10th Allianz Risk Barometer. 2021. Disponível em: < https://www.agcs.allianz.com/news-and-insights/reports/allianz-risk-barometer.html> Acesso em: 10 mai. 2021. AHMED, F.; KILIC, K. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A performance analysis of various algorithms. Fuzzy Sets Syst., v. 362, p. 110-128, 2019. DOI:10.1016/j.fss.2018.08.009. ALEKSIĆ, A. et al. Advanced risk assessment in reverse supply chain processes: A case study in Republic of Serbia. Adv. in Prod. Engine. & Manage., v. 14, n. 4, p. 421-434, 2019 DOI: 10.14743/apem2019.4.338. ALMEIDA, A.T. et al. Multicriteria and multiobjective models for risk, reliability and maintenance decision analysis. Suíça: Springer, 2015, 395 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17969-8. ALMEIDA, A.T. Processo de decisão nas organizações: construindo modelos de decisão multicritério. São Paulo: Atlas, 2013. ALOINI, D. et al. Supply chain management: a review of implementation risks in the construction industry. Bus. Proc. Manag. J., v. 18, n. 5, p. 735-761, 2012. DOI: 10.1108/14637151211270135. ANDERSON, D. R. Corporate Survival: The Critical Importance of Sustainability Risk Management. New York: Universe Publishing, 2005. ANDERSON, D. R.; ANDERSON, K.E. Sustainability risk management. Risk Manag. Insur. Rev., v. 12, n. 1, p. 25–38, 2009. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6296.2009.01152.x. ANDRADE, E.L. Introdução à Pesquisa Operacional: Métodos e Modelos para Análise de Decisões. Rio de Janeiro: LTC, 5. ed., 2015, 220 p. ANP - AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE PETRÓLEO, GÁS NATURAL E BIOCOMBÚSTIVEIS. Anuário estatístico brasileiro do petróleo, gás natural e biocombustíveis: 2020. Rio de Janeiro: ANP, 2008. 268 p. il. Disponível em: <http://www.anp.gov.br/publicacoes/anuario-estatistico/5809-anuario-estatistico-2020> Acesso em: 05 abr. 2021. ANSOFF, H.I. A nova estratégia empresarial. São Paulo: Atlas, 1990, 268 p. API - American Petroleum Institute. Oil and Natural Gas Supply Chains, America’s Energy Revolution, Oil Supply Chain [DM2015-036]. 2015. Disponível em: <https://energyinfrastructure.org/energy-101/oil-supply-chain> Acesso em: 8 set. 2020. APPLEQUIST, G.E.; PEKNY, J.F.; REKLAITIS, G.V. Risk and uncertainty in managing chemical manufacturing supply chains. Comp. Chem. Eng., v. 24, n. 9-10, p. 2211-2222, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00585-8. AQLAN, F. A software application for rapid risk assessment in integrated supply chains. Exp. Syst. with Applic., v. 43, p. 109-116, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.08.028. AQLAN, F.; LAM, S.S. Supply chain optimization under risk and uncertainty: A case study for high-end server manufacturing. Comput. Ind. Eng., v. 93, p. 78–87, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2015.12.025. ASGARI, N. et al. Supply chain management 1982–2015: A review. IMA J. Manag. Math., v. 27, n. 3, p. 353–379, 2016. DOI: 10.1093/imaman/dpw004. ASTANTI, R. D.; MBOLLA, S.; AI, T. Raw material supplier selection in a glove manufacturing: Application of AHP and fuzzy AHP. Dec. Sci. Letters, v. 9, p. 291-312, 2020. DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2020.5.005. AVELAR-SOSA, L.; GARCÍA-ALCARAZ, J.L.; CASTRELLÓN-TORRES, J.P. The effects of some risk factors in the supply chains performance: a case of study. J. of App. Res. and Tech., v. 12, n. 5, p. 958-968, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/S1665-6423(14)70602-9. AWASTHI, A.; GOVINDAN, K.; GOLD, S. Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 195, p. 106-117, 2018. DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013. BAGHALIAN, A.; REZAPOUR, S.; FARAHANI, R.Z. Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: A real-life case. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 227, n. 1, p. 199-215, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.017. BAK, O. Supply chain risk management research agenda: From a literature review to a call for future research directions. Bus. Proc. Manag. J., v. 24, n. 2, p. 567-588, 2018. DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-02-2017-0021 BANDALY, D. et al. Supply chain risk management - II: A review of operational, financial and integrated approaches. Risk Manag., v. 15, n. 1, 2013. DOI: 10.1057/rm.2012.8 BASTIAN M.; HEYMANN S.; JACOMY M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: THIRD INT. ICWSM CONFERENCE, p. 361-362, 2009. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Disponível em: <https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/view/154> Acesso em: 05 mar. 2020. BATAGELJ, V.; MRVAR, A. Pajek: Program for analysis and visualization of large networks - reference manual. Slovenia: University of Ljubljana, 2011. BEHZADI, G. et al. Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models. Omega, v. 79, p. 21-42, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2017.07.005. BEN-TAL, A. et al. Robust optimization for emergency logistics planning: Risk mitigation in humanitarian relief supply chains. Transp. Res. Part B: Method., v. 45, n. 8, p. 1177-1189, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.09.002. BERTRAND, J.W.M.; FRANSOO, J. Modelling and simulation. In: KARLSSON, C. (Ed.). Researching operations management. New York: Routledge, 2009. BLACKBURN, W. R. The Sustainability Handbook: The Complete Management Guide to Achieving Social, Economic and Environmental Responsibility. London: Earthscan, 2007, 826 p. BLACKHURST, J. et al. An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 43, n. 19, p. 4067-4081, 2005. DOI: 10.1080/00207540500151549. BOENDER, C.; DE GRAAN, J.; LOOTSMA, F. Multi-criteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy Sets Syst., v. 29, p. 133-143, 1989. DOI:10.1016/0165-0114(89)90187-5. BOGATAJ, D.; BOGATAJ, M. Measuring the Supply Chain Risk and Vulnerability in Frequency Space. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 108, p. 291-301, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.12.017. BOYD, J. COVID-19 Survey: impacts on global supply chains. Institute for Supply Management (ISM). 2020. Disponível em: http://ism.files.cms-plus.com/ISMReport/ISM_Coronavirus%20Survey%20Release_3.11.20_FINAL.pdf. Acesso em: 20 mai. 2020. BRADLEY, J.R. The complexity of assessing supply chain risk. In: THOMAS, A.R. (ed.). Supply chain Security: International Practices and Innovations in Moving Goods Safely and Efficiently. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2010. BRANCOLI, P. et al. Bread loss rates at the supplier-retailer interface - Analysis of risk factors to support waste prevention measures. Res., Cons. and Recy., v. 147, p. 128-136, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.027. BRANDENBURG, M. et al. Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 233, n. 2, p. 299-312, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.032. BRASIL. Lei n. 6.938, de 31 de agosto de 1981. Dispõe sobre a Política Nacional do Meio Ambiente, seus fins e mecanismos de formulação e aplicação, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União: Brasília, DF, p. 16509, 02 set. 1981. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l6938.htm> Acesso em: 03 jan. 2021. BRASIL. Lei n. 9.478, de 6 de agosto de 1997. Dispõe sobre a política energética nacional, as atividades relativas ao monopólio do petróleo, institui o Conselho Nacional de Política Energética e a Agência Nacional do Petróleo e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União: Brasília, DF, p. 16925, 07 ago. 1997. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9478.htm> Acesso em: 03 jun. 2020. BRUNDTLAND, G. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. United Nations General Assembly document A/42/427, 1987. BRUNO, G. et al. AHP-based approaches for supplier evaluation: Problems and perspectives. J. Purch. Supply Manag., v. 18, p. 159-172, 2012. DOI:10.1016/j.pursup.2012.05.001. BRYMAN, A. Research methods and organization studies. Londres: Unwin Hyman, 1989. BUCKLEY, J.J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst., v. 17, p. 233-247, 1985. DOI:10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9. BUGERT, N.; LASCH, R. Supply chain disruption models: A critical review. Log. Research, v. 11, n. 5, p. 1-35, 2018. DOI: 10.23773/2018_5. BÜYÜKÖZKAN, G. An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for green supplier evaluation. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 50, p. 2892-2909, 2012. CARNEIRO, M. C.; RIBAS, G. P.; HAMACHER, S. Risk management in the oil supply chain. A CVaR Approach. Ind. & Enginee. Chem. Res., v. 49, n. 7, p. 3286-3294, 2010. DOI: 10.1021/ie901265n. CAUCHICK-MIGUEL, P.A.; SOUSA, R. O Método do Estudo de Caso na Engenharia de Produção. In: CAUCHICK-MIGUEL, P.A.C. (Coord.). Metodologia de pesquisa em engenharia de produção e gestão de operações. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 3. ed., 2018. CERQUEIRA, T.L.; BERTONI, F.C.; PIRES, M.G. Instance Genetic Selection for Fuzzy Rule-based Systems Optimization to Opinion Classification. IEEE Latam Trans., v. 18, p. 1215-1221, 2020. DOI:10.1109/TLA.2020.9099762. CHAI, J.; LIU, J.N.K.; NGAI, E.W.T. Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert Syst. Appl., v. 40, p. 3872-3885, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040. CHAI, J.; NGAI, E.W.T. Decision-making techniques in supplier selection: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Exp. Syst. Appl., v. 140, 112903, 2020. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112903. CHAMODRAKAS, I., BATIS, D.; MARTAKOS, D. Supplier selection in electronic marketplaces using satisficing and fuzzy AHP. Exp. Syst. with App., v. 37, p. 490 - 498, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.043. CHAN, F.T.S. et al. Global supplier selection: A fuzzy-AHP approach. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 46, n. 14, p. 3825-3857, 2008. DOI: 10.1080/00207540600787200. CHAN, F.T.S.; CHAN, H.K. An AHP model for selection of suppliers in the fast changing fashion market. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., v. 51, p. 1195-1207, 2010. DOI:10.1007/s00170-010-2683-6. CHAN, F.T.S.; KUMAR, N. Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, v. 35, n. 4, p. 417-431, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.08.004. CHANG, D. Y. Extent Analysis and Synthetic Decision: Optimization, Techniques and Applications. Singapore: World Scientific, 1992, 352 p. CHANG, D.Y. Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 95, p. 649-655, 1996. DOI:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2. CHAUDHURI, A. et al. A conceptual framework for improving effectiveness of risk management in supply networks. The Int. J. of Log. Manage., v. 31, n. 1, p. 77-98, 2020. DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-11-2018-0289. CHAUDHURI, A.; MOHANTY, B.K.; SINGH, K.N. Supply Chain Risk Assessment during New Product Development: A Group Decision Making Approach Using Numeric and Linguistic Data. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 51, p. 2790-2804, 2013. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2012.654922. CHEN, P.-S.; WU, M.-T. A Modified Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Method for Supplier Selection Problems in the Supply Chain Risk Environment: A Case Study. Comput. Ind. Eng., v. 66, p. 634-642, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2013.09.018. CHICKSAND, D. et al. Theoretical perspectives in purchasing and supply chain management: An analysis of the literature. Supply Chain Manage., v. 17, p. 454-472, 2012. CHIU, C.H.; CHOI, T.M. Supply chain risk analysis with mean-variance models: A technical review. Ann. Oper. Res., v. 240, n. 2, p. 489-507, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-013-1386-4. CHO, D. W. et al. A framework for measuring the performance of service supply chain management. Comp. & Ind. Enginee., v. 62, n. 3, p. 801–818, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.014. CHOI, T.Y.; DOOLEY, K.J.; RUNGTUSANATHAM, M. Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: control versus emergence. J. Oper. Manage., v. 19, n. 3, p. 351-366, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00068-1. CHOPRA, S.; REINHARDT, G.; MOHAN, U. The importance of decoupling recurrent and disruption risks in a supply chain. Naval Res. Log., v. 54, n. 5, p. 544-555, 2007. DOI: 10.1002/nav.20228. CHOPRA, S.; SODHI, M. S. Managing Risk to Avoid Supply-chain Breakdown. MIT Sloan Manage. Review, v. 46, n. 53-62, 2004. Disponível em: <https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/managing-risk-to-avoid-supplychain-breakdown/> Acesso em: 03 set. 2020. CHRISTOPHER, M. et al. Approaches to managing global sourcing risk. Supply Chain Manage.: An Int. J., v. 16, n. 2, p. 67-81, 2011. DOI: 10.1108/13598541111115338. CHRISTOPHER, M. et al. Understanding supply chain risk: A self-assessment workbook. Dep. for Transp., Cranfield University: 2003. Disponivel em: <http://hdl.handle.net/1826/4373> Acesso em: 31 maio 2020. CHRISTOPHER, M.; LEE, H. Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log., v. 34, n. 5, p. 388-396, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/09600030410545436. CHRISTOPHER, M.; PECK, H. Building the resilient supply chain. The Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 15, n. 2, p. 1-14, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/09574090410700275. CLIFT, R. Metrics for supply chain sustainability. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, v. 5, p. 240–247, 2003. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-003-0220-0. COBO, M.J. et al. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tec., v. 62, p. 1382-1402, 2011. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21525. COLICCHIA, C. et al. Information sharing in supply chains: a review of risks and opportunities using the systematic literature network analysis (SLNA). Supply Chain Manage.: An Int. J., v. 24, n. 1, p. 5-21, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-01-2018-0003. COLICCHIA, C.; STROZZI, F. Supply chain risk management: a new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manag., n. 17, v. 4, p. 403-418, 2012. DOI: 10.1108/13598541211246558. COUSINS, P.D.; LAMMING, R.C.; BOWEN, F. The role of risk in environment‐related supplier initiatives. Int. J. of Oper. & Prod. Manage., v. 24, n. 6, p. 554-565, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/01443570410538104. CRAIGHEAD, C.W. et al. The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sci., v. 38, p. 131-156, 2007. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00151.x. CRONIN, B.; DING, Y. Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem. Infor. Proc. Manage., v. 47, p. 80-96, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2010.01.002. CRUZ, J. M. Mitigating global supply chain risks through corporate social responsibility. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 51, n. 13, p. 3995-4010, 2013. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.762134. CUCCHIELLA, F.; GASTALDI, M. Risk management in supply chain: A real option approach. J. Manuf. Techno. Manage., v. 17, n. 6, p. 700-720, 2006. DOI: 10.1108/17410380610678756. DAMERT, M. et al. Motivating low-carbon initiatives among suppliers: The role of risk and opportunity perception. Res., Cons. and Recy., v. 136, pp. 276-286, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.002. DEBACKERE, K.; VEUGELERS, R. The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Res. Policy, v. 34 n. 3, p. 321-342, 2005. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.003  DÍAZ-CURBELO, A.; ESPIN ANDRADE, R.A.; GENTO MUNICIO, Á.M. The Role of Fuzzy Logic to Dealing with Epistemic Uncertainty in Supply Chain Risk Assessment: Review Standpoints. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., v. 22, p. 2769-2791, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s40815-020-00846-5. DING, Q.; DONG, L.; KOUVELIS, P. On the integration of production and financial hedging decisions in global markets. Oper. Res., v. 55, n. 3, p. 470-489, 2007. DOI: 10.1287/opre.1070.0364. DU, S. et al. Game-theoretic analysis for an emission-dependent supply chain in a ‘cap-and-trade’ system. Ann. Oper. Res., v. 228, n. 1, p. 135-149, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-011-0964-6. EGRI, P. A centralized/decentralized design of a full return contract for a risk-free manufacturer and a risk- neutral retailer under partial information sharing: a discussion. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 141, n. 1, p. 437-438, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.07.016. ELLIS, S. C.; HENRY, R. M.; SHOCKLEY, J. Buyer Perceptions of Supply Disruption Risk: A Behavioral View and 
Empirical Assessment. J. Oper. Manag., v. 28, p. 34-46, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2009.07.002. EMROUZNEJAD, A.; HO, W. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017. DOI: 10.1201/9781315369884. ENDNOTE WEB. 2020. Disponível em: <http://www.myendnoteweb.com> Acesso em: 04 mar. 2020. ENYINDA, C. I. et al. Petroleum Supply Chain Risk Analysis in a Multinational Oil Firm in Nigeria. J. of Mark. Develop. and Competitiv., v. 5, n. 7, p. 37-44, 2011. Disponível em: <https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Petroleum-Supply-Chain-Risk-Analysis-in-a-Firm-in-Enyinda-Briggs/e63c5d98d1b3a66db01329579f6ca7ed4d346c34> Acesso em: 11 jun. 2020. ER KARA, M.; FIRAT, S.Ü.O. Supplier Risk Assessment Based on Best-Worst Method and K-Means Clustering: A Case Study. Sustainability, v. 10, 1066, 2018. DOI:10.3390/su10041066. ESKANDARPOUR, M. et al. Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review. Omega, v. 54, p. 11-32, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.01.006. ESMAEILIKIA, M. et al. Tactical supply chain planning models with inherent flexibility: Definition and review. Ann. Oper. Res., v. 244, n. 2, p. 407-427, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-014-1544-3. FAGUNDES, M.V.C. et al. Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda. Eur. Res. on Manage. and Bus. Econo., v. 26, n. 2, p. 63-70, 2020a. DOI: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.02.001. FAGUNDES, M.V.C. et al. Multicriteria decision-making system for supplier selection considering risk: a computational Fuzzy AHP-based approach. IEEE Latin Am. Trans., v. 19, n. 9, p. 1564-1572, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/TLA.2021.9468610. FAGUNDES, M.V.C. et al. Projeto de desenvolvimento de modelo de inteligência artificial para gestão de riscos da cadeia de suprimentos de energia. In: VI CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ESTUDOS ORGANIZACIONAIS (CBEO), 6., ago. 28-31, 2019, Recife (PE). Anais [...]. Recife (PE): UFPE, 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.even3.com.br/anais/vicbeo/168365-projeto-de-desenvolvimento-de-modelo-de-inteligencia-artificial-para-gestao-de-riscos-da-cadeia-de-suprimentos-de/> Acesso em: 03 mai. 2021. FAGUNDES, M.V.C. et al. Quantitative and computational modeling for supply chain risk management: review and bibliometric analysis. In: XXI SEMINÁRIOS EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO (SEMEAD) e XIII RESEARCH WORKSHOP ON INSTITUTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS (RWIO), 21., nov. 7-9, 2018, São Paulo (SP). Anais [...]. São Paulo (SP): USP, 2018. Disponível em: <https://login.semead.com.br/21semead/anais/resumo.php?cod_trabalho=598> Acesso em: 20 ago. 2021. FAGUNDES, M.V.C. et al. Seleção de áreas para licitações através do método TOPSIS. In: XVII CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ENERGIA (CBE), 17., nov. 21-22, 2017, Rio de Janeiro (RJ). Anais [...]. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): CBE, 2017. FAGUNDES, M.V.C. et al. Supply chain risk management modelling: a systematic literature network analysis review. IMA J. Manage. Math., v. 31, n. 4, p. 387-416, 2020b. DOI: 10.1093/imaman/dpaa019. FAGUNDES, M.V.C.; FREIRES, F.G.M.; VIEIRA DE MELO, S.B.A. Strategic management model supply chain risk upstream oil and natural gas fields mature onshore. In: 5TH PRODUCTION & OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT WORLD CONFERENCE: Joining P&OM Forces Worldwide, Present and Future of Operations Management (P&OM), 5., set. 6-10, 2016, Havana - Cuba. FAGUNDES, M.V.C.; HELLINGRATH, B.; FREIRES, F.G.M. Supplier selection risk: a new computer-based decision-making system with Fuzzy Extended AHP. Logistics, v. 5, n. 13, 17 p., 2021. DOI: 10.3390/logistics5010013. FAGUNDES, M.V.C.; MARQUES, R.S.; FREIRES, F.G.M. Gestão da cadeia de suprimentos para sistemas de energias renováveis: conceitos e reflexões sobre a realidade brasileira. In: XXXVI ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ENGENHARIA DE PRODUÇÃO (ENEGEP), 36., out. 3-6, 2016, João Pessoa (PB). Anais [...]. João Pessoa (PB): ABEPRO, 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.abepro.org.br/biblioteca/TN_STO_236_374_29904.pdf> Acesso em 12 abr. 2021. FAHIMNIA, B. et al. Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 247, p. 1-15, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.034. FAISAL, M.N.; BANWET, D.K.; SHANKAR, R. Quantification of risk mitigation environment of supply chains using graph theory and matrix methods. Eur. J. Ind. Eng., v. 1, p. 22-39, 2007. DOI: 10.1504/EJIE.2007.012652. FAN, Y.; HEILIG, L.; VOSS, S. Supply chain risk management in the Era of Big Data. In: MARCUS A. (Ed.) Design, user experience, and usability: Design discourse. Lect. Notes Comput. Sc., v. 9186. Suíça: Springer, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20886-2_27. FAN, Y.; STEVENSON, M. A review of supply chain risk management: Definition, theory, and research agenda. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log., v. 48, n. 3, p. 205-230, 2018. DOI: 10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0043. FANG, C.; LIAO, X.; XIE, M. A Hybrid Risks-informed Approach for the Selection of Supplier Portfolio. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 54, p. 2019-2034, 2016. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2015.1076947. FERNANDES, L. J.; BARBOSA-PÓVOA, A. P. F. D.; RELVAS, S. I. C. Risk Management Framework for the Petroleum Supply Chain. Comp. Aided Chem. Enginee., v. 28, p. 157-162, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/S1570-7946(10)28027-6. FERNANDES, R. Engenharia de software. Curitiba: Fael, 2017, 263 p. FINCH, P. Supply chain risk management. Supply Chain Manage., v. 9, n. 2, p. 183-196, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/13598540410527079. FLOR, A. J. Análise de Risco Financeiro em Projetos do Setor de Petróleo e Gás. In: SIMPÓSIO DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO E TECNOLOGIA (SEGeT), 9., 2012, Rezende. Anais eletrônicos [...]. Rezende: AEDB, 2012. Disponível em: <https://www.aedb.br/seget/arquivos/artigos12/44316466.pdf> Acesso em: 15 jun. 2021. FOERSTL, K. et al. Managing supplier sustainability risks in a dynamically changing environment - Sustainable supplier management in the chemical industry. J. of Purch. and Supp. Manage., v. 16, n. 2, p. 118-130, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2010.03.011. FRIDAY, D. et al. Collaborative risk management: a systematic literature review. Int. J. of Physical Distrib. and Log. Manage., v. 48, n. 3, p. 231-253, 2018. DOI: 10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0035. FUNDO MONETÁRIO INTERNACIONAL [FMI]. 2020. World Economic Outlook 2020: Chapter 1 The Great Lockdown. Washington: 2020. Disponível em:<https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/04/14/weo-april-2020> Acesso em: 10 jul. 2020. GANGA, G.M.D. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso [TCC] na Engenharia de Produção: um guia prático de conteúdo e forma. São Paulo: Atlas, 2012, 384 p. GANGULY, K.; KUMAR, G. Supply Chain Risk Assessment: a fuzzy AHP approach. Oper. and Supp. Chain Manage.: An Int. Journal, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1-13, 2019. DOI: 10.31387/oscm0360217. GANGULY, K.K.; GUIN, K.K. A fuzzy AHP approach for inbound supply risk assessment. Benchmarking: An Int. J., v. 20, n. 1, p. 129-146, 2013. DOI: 10.1108/14635771311299524. GARFIELD, E. The History and meaning of the Journal Impact Factor. JAMA: The J. Am. Med. Assoc., v. 295, p. 90-93, 2006. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.1.90. GARVEY, M.D.; CARNOVALE, S.; YENIYURT, S. An analytical framework for supply network risk propagation: A bayesian network approach. Eur. J. of Oper. Res., v. 243, p. 618–627, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.10.034. GAUDENZI, B.; BORGHESI, A. Managing risks in the supply chain using the AHP method. The Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 17, n. 1, p. 114-136, 2006. DOI: 10.1108/09574090610663464. GEBRESLASSIE, B.H.; YAO, Y.; YOU, F. Design under uncertainty of hydrocarbon biorefinery supply chains: Multiobjective stochastic programming models, decomposition algorithm, and a comparison between CVaR and downside risk. AIChE J., v. 58, p. 2155-2179, 2012. DOI:10.1002/aic.13844. GHADGE, A. et al. A systems approach for modelling supply chain risks. Supply Chain Manage., v. 18, n. 5, p. 523-538, 2013. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-11-2012-0366. GHADGE, A. et al. Managing cyber risk in supply chains: a review and research agenda. Supp. Chain Manage., v. 25, n. 2, p. 223-240, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-10-2018-0357. GHADGE, A.; DANI, S.; KALAWSKY, R. Supply chain risk management: present and future scope. Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 23, n. 3, p. 313-339, 2012. DOI: 10.1108/09574091211289200. GIANNAKIS, M.; LOUIS, M. A multi-agent based framework for supply chain risk management. J. of Purch. and Supply Manage., v. 17, n. 1, p. 23-31, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2010.05.001. GIANNAKIS, M.; PAPADOPOULOS, T. Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 171, part 4, p. 455-470, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.032. GILAT, A.; SUBRAMANIAM, V. Métodos Numéricos para Engenheiros e Cientistas [recurso eletrônico]: uma introdução com aplicações usando o MATLAB. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2008, 480 p. GOLD, S.; AWASTHI, A. Sustainable global supplier selection extended towards sustainability risks from (1+n)th tier suppliers using fuzzy AHP based approach. IFAC-PapersOnLine, v. 48, n 3, p. 966-971, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.208. GOUDA, S. K; SARANGA, H. Sustainable supply chains for supply chain sustainability: impact of sustainability efforts on supply chain risk. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 56, n. 17, p. 5820-5835, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1456695. GUERTLER, B.; SPINLER, S. Supply risk interrelationships and the derivation of key supply risk indicators. Tech. Forec. and Social Change, v. 92, pp. 224-236, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.004. GULER, D. Fuzzy AHP (Chang) (Liou, Wang). MATLAB Central File Exchange. Disponível em: <https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/66688-fuzzy-ahp-chang-liou-wang> Acesso em: 18 de mar. 2022. HAHN, G. J.; KUHN, H. Value-based Performance and Risk Management in Supply Chains: A Robust Optimization Approach. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 139, n. 1, p. 135-144, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.04.002. HALLDÓRSSON, A.; KOTZAB, H.; SKJØTT-LARSEN, T. Supply chain management on the crossroad to sustainability: a blessing or a curse? Logist. Res., v. 1, p. 83–94, 2009. DOI: s/n. HALLIKAS, J.; VIROLAINEN, V.M.; TUOMINEN, M. Risk analysis and assessment in network environments: a dyadic case study. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 78, n. 1, p. 45-55, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00098-6. HARLAND, C.; BRENCHLEY, R.; WALKER, H. Risk in supply networks. J. Purch. Supp. Manage., v. 9, n. 2, p. 51-62, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S1478-4092(03)00004-9. HARWOOD, I; HUMBY, S. Embedding corporate responsibility into supply: A snapshot of progress. Eur. Manage. J., v. 26, n. 3, p. 166-174, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2008.01.005. HAZEN, B. T. et al. Data quality for data science, predictive analytics, and Big Data in supply chain management: An introduction to the problem and suggestions for research and applications. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 154, p. 72–80, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.04.018. HECKMANN, I.; COMES, T.; NICKEL, S. A critical review on supply chain risk: Definition, measure and modeling. Omega, v. 52, p. 119-132, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.004. HENDRICKS, K.B.; SINGHAL, V.R. An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long‐run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Prod. Oper. Manage., v. 14, p. 35-52, 2005. DOI:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00008.x. HENDRICKS, K.B.; SINGHAL, V.R. The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. J. Oper. Manage., v. 21, n. 5, p. 501-522, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2003.02.003. HIRSCH, J. E. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 102, n. 46, p. 16569-16572, 2005. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102. HMIEL, B. et al. Preindustrial 14CH4 indicates greater anthropogenic fossil CH4 emissions. Nature, v. 578, p. 409 - 412, 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-1991-8. HO, W. et al. Supply chain risk management: A literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 53, n. 16, p. 5031-5069, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467. HO, W., XU, X., DEY, P.K. Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 202, n. 1, p. 16-24, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009. HOFMANN, H. et al. Sustainability‐Related Supply Chain Risks: Conceptualization and Management. Bus. Strat. Env., v. 23, p. 160-172, 2014. DOI:10.1002/bse.1778. HOLMSTRÖM, J. et al. The Digitalization of Operations and Supply Chain Management: Theoretical and Methodological Implications. J. of Oper. Manage., v. 65, n. 8, p. 728-734, 2019. DOI: 10.1002/joom.1073. HUDNURKAR M. et al. Supply Chain Risk Classification Schemes: A Literature Review. Oper. and Supply Chain Manage., v. 10, n. 4, p. 182-199, 2017. DOI: 10.31387/oscm0290190. HUNG, S. J. Activity-based Divergent Supply Chain Planning for Competitive Advantage in the Risky Global Environment: A DEMATEL-ANP Fuzzy Goal Programming Approach. Exp. Syst. with App., v. 38, pp 9053-9062, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.024. IBP - INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE PETRÓLEO E GÁS. Média de produção de petróleo dos poços onshore (barril por dia) - fev. 2019. Rio de Janeiro, 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.ibp.org.br/observatorio-do-setor/snapshots/media-de-producao-de-petroleo-dos-pocos-onshore/> Acesso em: 10 abr. 2021. IEA - INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY. Global Energy Review 2021: Assessing the effects of economic recoveries on global energy demand and CO2 emissions in 2021. France, 2021a. 36 p. Disponível em: <https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2021> Acesso em: 5 abr. 2021. IEA - INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY. Net Zero by 2050: A roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. France, 2021b. 224 p. Disponível em: <https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050> Acesso em: 30 abr. 2021. IOANNIDOU, D. et al. Evaluating the risks in the construction wood product system through a criticality assessment framework. Res., Cons. and Recy., v. 146, p. 68-76, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.021. ISM - INSTITUTE FOR SUPPLY MANAGEMENT. COVID-19 and supply chains: increasing impacts, decreasing revenues. Disponível em: <https://weareism.org/docs/White-Paper-Corona-V2.pdf> Acesso em: 20 dez. 2020. JAIN, N.; SINGH, A.R. Sustainable supplier selection under must-be criteria through Fuzzy inference system. J. Clean. Prod., v. 248, 119275, 2020. DOI:0.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119275. JHARKHARIA, S.; SHANKAR, R. Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process ANP approach. Omega, v. 35, p. 274-289, 2007. DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2005.06.005. JOHN, A. et al. An integrated fuzzy risk assessment for seaport operations. Saf. Sci., v. 68, p. 180-194, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.001. JUNG, C.F. Metodologia Científica: ênfase em pesquisa tecnológica. 4. ed., 2004. Disponível em: < http://www.jung.pro.br/moodle/> Acesso em: 31 jun. 2021. JÜTTNER, U. Supply chain risk management: Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. The Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 16, n. 1, p. 120-141, 2005. DOI: 10.1108/09574090510617385. JÜTTNER, U., PECK, H.; CHRISTOPHER, M. Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. Int. J. Logist - Res. App., v. 6, n. 4, p. 197-210, 2003. DOI: 10.1080/13675560310001627016. KABRA, G.; RAMESH, A.; ARSHINDER, K. Identification and prioritization of coordination barriers in humanitarian supply chain management. Int. J. of Disaster Risk Reduc., v. 13, p. 128-138, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.011. KACHE, F.; SEURING, S. Challenges and opportunities of digital information at the intersection of Big Data Analytics and supply chain management. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage., v. 37, n. 1, p. 10-36, 2017. DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-02-2015-0078. KAFA, N.; JAEGLER, A.; SARKIS, J. Harnessing Corporate Sustainability Decision-Making Complexity: A Field Study of Complementary Approaches. Sustainability, v. 12, 10584, 2020. DOI:10.3390/su122410584. KAHRAMAN, C. Multi-criteria decision making methods and Fuzzy sets. In: KAHRAMAN, C. (Ed). Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Development. Istanbul: Springer, 2008. Disponível em:<https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387768120> Acesso em: 11 dez. 2020. KAHRAMAN, C.; CEBECI, U.; ULUKAN; Z. Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Log. Inf. Manage., v. 16, n. 6, p. 382–394, 2003. DOI: 10.1108/09576050310503367. KERAMATI, A. et al. A novel methodology for evaluating the risk of CRM projects in fuzzy environment. Neural Comput. & App., v. 23, p. 29-53, 2013. DOI:10.1007/s00521-012-1216-7. KERN, D. et al. Supply risk management: model development and empirical analysis. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log., v. 42, n. 1, p. 60-82, 2012. DOI: 10.1108/09600031211202472. KEXIN, B; PING, H.; HUI, Y. Risk identification, evaluation and response of low-carbon technological innovation under the global value chain: A case of the Chinese manufacturing industry. Tech. Forec. and Social Change, v. 100, p. 238-248, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.005. KHAN, F.I.; SADIQ, R.; HADDARA, M.M. Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance (RBIM): Multi-Attribute Decision-Making with Aggregative Risk Analysis. Proc. Safe. and Env. Protec., v. 82, n. 6, p. 398-411, 2004. DOI: 10.1205/psep.82.6.398.53209. KHAN, O.; BURNES, B. Risk and supply chain management: Creating a research agenda. Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 18, n. 2, p. 197-216, 2007. DOI: 10.1108/09574090710816931. KHAN, S. et al. Prioritising the risks in Halal food supply chain: an MCDM approach. J. of Islamic Mark., v. ahead-of-print, n. ahead-of-print, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/JIMA-10-2018-0206. KHOJASTEH, Y. Supply Chain Risk Management: Advanced Tools, Models, and Developments. Suíça: Springer, 2018, 334 p. KILINCCI, O.; ONAL, S.A. Fuzzy ahp approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Exp. Syst. with App., v. 38, n. 8, p. 9656–9664, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.159. KILUBI, I. The strategies of supply chain risk management - a synthesis and classification. Int. J. Log. Res. Applications, v. 19, n. 6, p. 604-629, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2016.1150440. KILUBI, I.; HAASIS, H. Supply chain risk management enablers - A framework development through systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2015. Int. J. Bus. Sci. App. Manage, v. 10, p. 35-54, 2015. KIRILMAZ, O.; EROL, S. A proactive approach to supply chain risk management: shifting orders among suppliers to mitigate the supply side risks. J. of Purch. and Supply Manage., v. 23, n. 1, p. 54-65, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2016.04.002. KLEINDORFER, P. R.; SAAD, G. H. Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Prod. and Oper. Manage., v. 14, n. 1, p. 53-68, 2005. DOI:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00009.x. KLIBI, W.; MARTEL, A.; GUITOUNI, A. The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: A critical review. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 203, p. 283-293, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.06.011. KÖCHE, J.C. Fundamentos de metodologia científica: teoria da ciência e iniciação à pesquisa. 34. ed. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2014, 184 p. KONYS, A. Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From a Literature Review to a Comprehensive Knowledge Base. Sustainability, v. 11, 4208, 2019. DOI:10.3390/su11154208. KOTZAB, H. et al. (Ed.). Research methodologies in supply chain management. Heidelberg: Physica - Verlag, 2005. KOUL, S.; VERMA, R. Dynamic vendor selection based on fuzzy AHP. J. Manuf. Tech. Manage., v. 22, n. 8, p. 963–971, 2011. DOI: 10.1108/17410381111177421. KUBLER, S. et al. A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications. Exp. Syst. with App., v. 65, p. 398-422, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.064. KULL, T.J.; TALLURI, S. A supply risk reduction model using integrated multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., v. 55, n. 3, p. 409-419, 2008. DOI:10.1109/TEM.2008.922627. KUMAR D.; GARG, C.P. Evaluating sustainable supply chain indicators using Fuzzy AHP: Case of Indian automotive industry. Benchmarking: An Int. J., v. 24, n. 6, p. 1742-1766, 2017. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-11-2015-0111. KUMAR, J.; ROY, N. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for a power transmission industry to vendor selection decisions. Int. J. Comput. Appl., v. 12, p. 26-30, 2011. DOI:10.5120/1727-2336. KUMAR, M.; VRAT, P.; SHANKAR, R. A Fuzzy Programming Approach for Vendor Selection Problem in a Supply Chain. Int. J. Prod. Econo., v. 101, p. 273-285, 2006. DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.01.005. LAVASTRE, O.; GUNASEKARAN, A., SPALANZANI, A. Effect of firm characteristics, supplier relationships and techniques used on Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM): an empirical investigation on French industrial firms. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 52, n. 11, 3381-3403, 2014. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2013.878057. LAVASTRE, O.; GUNASEKARAN, A.; SPALANZANI, A. Supply chain risk management in french companies. Dec. Supp. Syst., v. 52, n. 4, p. 828-838, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2011.11.017. LAW, A.M.; KELTON, W.D. Simulation Modeling and Analysis. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 3. ed., 2000. LEE, A.H.I. A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Expert Syst. Appl., v. 36, p. 2879-2893, 2009. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.045. LEE, H.L.; WHANG, S. Information sharing in a supply chain. Int. J. of Tech. Manage., v. 20, n. 3/4, p. 373-387, 2000. DOI: 10.1504/IJMTM.2000.001329. LI, G. et al. Joint supply chain risk management: an agency and collaboration perspective. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 164, p. 83-94, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.021. LI, M. et al. Risk assessment of supply chain for pharmaceutical excipients with AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., v. 42, n. 4, p. 676-684, 2016. DOI: 10.3109/03639045.2015.1075027. LIMA JUNIOR, F.R.; OSIRO, L.; CARPINETTI, L.C.R. Multicriteria decision methods for supplier selection: A literature review on the state of the art. Gest. Prod., v. 20, p. 781-801, 2013. DOI:10.1590/S0104-530X2013005000005. LIU, Z.; NAGURNEY, A. Supply Chain Outsourcing under Exchange Rate Risk and Competition. Omega: The Int. J. Manage. Sci., v. 39, p. 539-549, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2010.11.003. LOCKAMY, A.; MCCORMACK, K. Analysing Risks in Supply Networks to Facilitate Outsourcing Decisions. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 48, p. 593-611, 2010. DOI:10.1080/00207540903175152. LUBISCO, N.M.L.; VIEIRA, S.C. Manual de estilo acadêmico: trabalhos de conclusão de curso, dissertações e teses. 6. ed. Salvador: EDUFBA, 2019. 158 p. MA, R.M.; YAO, L.F.; HUANG, R. The Green Supply Chain Management Risk Analysis. Adv. Mat. Res., v. 573–574, p. 734–739, 2012. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.573-574.734. MANGLA, S.K.; KUMAR, P.; BARUA, M.K. An integrated methodology of FTA and fuzzy AHP for risk assessment in green supply chain. Int. J. of Op. Res., v. 25, n. 1, p. 77-99, 2016. DOI: 10.1504/IJOR.2016.073252. MANGLA, S.K.; KUMAR, P.; BARUA, M.K. Flexible Decision Approach for Analysing Performance of Sustainable Supply Chains Under Risks/Uncertainty. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manage., v. 15, p. 113-130, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s40171-014-0059-8. MANGLA, S.K.; KUMAR, P.; BARUA, M.K. Flexible decision modeling for evaluating the risks in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP and IRP methodologies. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manage., v. 16, n. 1, p. 19-35, 2015a. DOI: 10.1007/s40171-014-0081-x. MANGLA, S.K.; KUMAR, P.; BARUA, M.K. Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: A case study. Res., Cons. and Recy., v. 104, part B, p. 375-390, 2015b. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.01.001. MANUJ, I.; MENTZER, J.T. Global supply chain risk management. J. Bus. Logist., v. 29, n. 1, p. 133, 2008. DOI: 10.1108/09600030810866986. MARCH, J.; SHAPIRA, Z. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Manage. Sci., v. 33, n. 11, p. 1404-1418, 1987. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1404. MARCONI, M.A.; LAKATOS, E.M. Fundamentos de Metodologia Científica. São Paulo: Atlas, 9. ed., 2021, 368 p. MARTINS, R.A. Abordagens quantitativa e qualitativa. In: CAUCHICK-MIGUEL, P.A.C. (Coord.). Metodologia de pesquisa em engenharia de produção e gestão de operações. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 3. ed., 2018. MAVI, R.K. et al. Identification and Assessment of Logistical Factors to Evaluate a Green Supplier Using the Fuzzy Logic DEMATEL Method. Polish J. of Env. Stud., v. 22, n. 2, p. 445-455, 2013. Disponível em: <http://www.pjoes.com/Identification-and-Assessment-of-Logistical-Factors-r-nto-Evaluate-a-Green-Supplier,88997,0,2.html> Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020. MEENA, P.; SARMAH, S.; SARKAR, A. Sourcing Decisions under Risks of Catastrophic Event Disruptions. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., v. 47, p. 1058-1074, 2011. DOI:10.1016/j.tre.2011.03.003. MEIXNER, O. Fuzzy AHP group decision analysis and its application for the evaluation of energy sources. In: INT. SYMP. ON THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY/NETWORK PROCESS, 10., 2009, Pittsburgh. Proceedings [...] v. 29, p. 2-16, 2009. Disponível em: <https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/FUZZY-AHP-GROUP-DECISION-ANALYSIS-AND-ITS-FOR-THE-Meixner/561437552bd5a048641b80fbf4e4654035db700f> Acesso: 10 abr. 2020. MICHELI, G.J.L.; CAGNO, E.; ZORZINI, M. Supply risk management vs supplier selection to manage the supply risk in the EPC supply chain. Manag. Res. News, v. 31, p. 846-866, 2008. DOI:10.1108/01409170810913042. MINTZBERG, H.; QUINN, J. B. O processo da estratégia. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 3. ed., 2003, 408 p. MISHRA, B.K.; RAGHUNATHAN, S. Retailer- vs. Vendor-managed inventory and brand competition. Manage. Sci., v. 50, n. 4, p. 445-457, 2004. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0174. MISHRA, D. et al. Big Data and supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. Ann. Oper. Res., v. 270, p. 313-336, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-016-2236-y. MITCHELL, V.-W. Organizational risk perception and reduction: a literature review. British J. of Manage., v. 6, n. 2, p. 115-133, 1995. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.1995.tb00089.x. MOGHADDAM, K.S. Supplier Selection and Order Allocation in Closed-loop Supply Chain Systems Using Hybrid Monte Carlo Simulation and Goal Programming. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 53, p. 6320-6338, 2015. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2015.1054452. MOHIB, A.M.N.; DEIF, A. M. Supply chain multi-state risk assessment using universal generating function. Prod. Plan. and Control, v. 31, n. 9, p. 699-708, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1680891. MULHALL, R.A.; BRYSON, J. R. Energy price risk and the sustainability of demand side supply chains, App. Energy, v. 123, p. 327-334, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.018. NAGURNEY, A. et al. Supply chain networks, electronic commerce, and supply side and demand side risk. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 164, n. 1, p. 120-142, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.11.007. NANDI, S. et al. Redesigning Supply Chains using Blockchain-Enabled Circular Economy and COVID-19 Experiences. Sust. Prod. and Cons., v. 27, p. 10-22, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.019. NASSAR, S. et al. Automotive recall risk: impact of buyer-supplier relationship on supply chain social sustainability. Int. J. of Prod. and Perf. Manage., v. 69, n. 3, p. 467-487, 2020. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2019-0026. NATARAJARATHINAM, M.; CAPAR, I.; NARAYANAN, A. Managing supply chains in times of crisis: a review of literature and insights. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log., v. 39, n. 7, p. 535-573, 2009. DOI: 10.1108/09600030910996251. NAZAM, M. et al. A Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Framework for the Risk Assessment of Green Supply Chain Implementation in the Textile Industry. Int. J. of Supp. and Operat. Manage., v. 2, n. 1, p. 548-568, 2015. DOI: 10.22034/2015.1.02. NETO, R.M.; PUREZA, V. Modelagem e simulação. In: CAUCHICK-MIGUEL, P.A.C. (Coord.). Metodologia de pesquisa em engenharia de produção e gestão de operações. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 3. ed., 2018. NGAN, S.L. et al. A Novel Risk Assessment Model for Green Finance: the Case of Malaysian Oil Palm Biomass Industry. Proc. Integr. Optim. Sustain., v. 3, p. 75–88, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s41660-018-0043-4. NORRMAN, A.; JANSSON, U. Ericsson’s Proactive Supply Chain Risk Management Approach after a Serious Sub-supplier Accident. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., v. 34, n. 5, p. 434-456, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/09600030410545463. OLIVEIRA, F.R.S.; LIMA NETO, F.B. Personalizing the explanation extraction in Intelligent Decision Support Systems. In: 16TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 16., 2021, p. 1-6, Chaves-Portugal. Anais eletrônicos [...]. Chaves: IEEE, 2021. DOI: 10.23919/CISTI52073.2021.9476588. OLIVEIRA, J.B. et al. The role of simulation and optimization methods in supply chain risk management: Performance and review standpoints. Sim. Modell. Prac. and The., v. 92, p. 17-44, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2018.11.007. OLIVEIRA, U.R.; ESPINDOLA, L.S.; MARINS, F.A.S. Analysis of supply chain risk management researches. Gest. Prod., v. 25, n. 4, 2018. DOI: 10.1590/0104-530x3515-16. OLSON, D.L.; WU, D.D. A review of enterprise risk management in supply chain. Kybernetes, v. 39, n. 5, p. 694-706, 2010. DOI: 10.1108/03684921011043198. PECK, H. Reconciling supply chain vulnerability, risk and supply chain management. Int. J. Logist. - Res. App., v. 9, p. 127-142, 2006. DOI: 10.1080/13675560600673578. PEIDRO, D. et al. Quantitative models for supply chain planning under uncertainty: a review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech, v. 43, p. 400-420, 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1715-y. PERSSON, O.; DANELL, R.; SCHNEIDER, J.W. How to use bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In: ÅSTRÖM, F. et al. (Ed.). Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday. International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, p. 9-24. PFOHL, H.C.; KÖHLER, H.; THOMAS, D. State of the art in supply chain risk management research: empirical and conceptual findings and a roadmap for the implementation in practice. Logist. Res., v. 2, p. 33-44, 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s12159-010-0023-8 PORTER, M.E. Estratégia competitiva: técnicas para análise de indústrias e da concorrência. São Paulo: Gen Atlas, 2005, 448 p. PRAKASH, S. et al. A critical analysis of supply chain risk management content: a structured literature review. J. Adv. Manage. Res., v. 14, n. 1, p. 69-90, 2017. DOI: 10.1108/JAMR-10-2015-0073. PRAKASH, S. et al. Prioritisation and assessment of collaboration decisions for supply chain with risk considerations using TOPSIS. Int. J. of Adv. Oper. Manage., v. 8, n. 3, p. 168-184, 2016. DOI: 10.1504/IJAOM.2016.081302. PRESSMAN, R.S. Engenharia de software: uma abordagem profissional. Porto Alegre: AMGH, 7. ed., 2011. PRODANOV, C.C.; FREITAS, E.C. Metodologia do Trabalho Científico [recurso eletrônico]: métodos e técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico. Novo Hamburgo: Feevale, 2. ed., 2013. PULLMAN, M.E.; MALONI, M.J.; CARTER, C. R. Food for thought: social versus environmental sustainability practices and performance outcomes. J. Supp. Chain Manage., v. 45, p. 38-54, 2009. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03175.x. QUEIROZ, M.; TELLES, R.; BONILLA, S. Blockchain and supply chain management integration: a systematic review of the literature. Supply Chain Manage., v. 25, n. 2, p. 241-254, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-03-2018-0143. QUINTELLA, C.O.V.; DELGADO, F.; LIMA, L.M. (Eds.) Doing Business with the Brazilian Onshore Environment, Cadernos FGV Energia, MME, ano 7, n. 10, jun. 2020, 100 p. Disponível em: <https://fgvenergia.fgv.br/publicacao/doing-business-brazilian-onshore-environment> Acesso: 12 out. 2020. RADIVOJEVIĆ, G.; GAJOVIĆ, V. Supply chain risk modeling by AHP and Fuzzy AHP methods. J. of Risk Res., v. 17, n. 3, p. 337-352, 2014. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2013.808689. RAJAGOPAL, V.; SHANMUGAM, P.; GOH, M. Decision-making models for supply chain risk mitigation: A review. Comput. Ind. Eng., v. 113, p. 646-682, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.09.043. RAJESH, R. Social and environmental risk management in resilient supply chains: A periodical study by the Grey-Verhulst model. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 57, n. 11, p. 3748-3765, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1566656. RAMANATHAN, R. Supplier selection problem: Integrating DEA with the approaches of total cost of ownership and AHP. Supply Chain Manage., v. 12, n. 4, p. 258-261, 2007. DOI: 10.1108/13598540710759772. RANGEL, D.A.; OLIVEIRA, T.K.; LEITE, M.S.A. Supply chain risk classification: discussion and proposal. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 53, n. 22, p. 6868-6887, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2014.910620. RAO, C. et al. Compound Mechanism Design of Supplier Selection Based on Multi-attribute Auction and Risk Management of Supply Chain. Comput. Ind. Eng., v. 105, p. 63-75, 2017. DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2016.12.042. RAO, S.; GOLDSBY, T.J. Supply chain risks: a review and typology.  Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 20, n. 1, p. 97-123, 2009. DOI: 10.1108/09574090910954864. RAVINDRAN, A.R. et al. Risk Adjusted Multicriteria Supplier Selection Models with Applications. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 48, p. 405-424, 2010. DOI:10.1080/00207540903174940. REINER, G. Supply chain management research methodology using quantitative models based on empirical data. In: KOTZAB, H. et al. (Ed.). Research methodologies in supply chain management. Heidelberg: Physica - Verlag, 2005. REVILLA, E.; SAENZ, M. J. The impact of risk management on the frequency of supply chain disruptions: A configurational approach. Int. J. of Op. & Prod. Manage., v. 37, n. 5, p. 557-576, 2017. DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2016-0129. REZAEI, J.; FAHIM, P.B.; TAVASSZY, L. Supplier selection in the airline retail industry using a funnel methodology: Conjunctive screening method and fuzzy AHP. Exp. Syst. with App., v. 41, n. 18, p. 8165-8179, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.005. REZAEI, J.; ORTT, R. Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 225, p. 75-84, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.037. ROEHRICH, J.K.; GROSVOLD, J.; HOEJMOSE, S.U. Reputational risks and sustainable supply chain management: Decision making under bounded rationality. Int. J. of Op. & Prod. Manage., v. 34, n. 5, p. 695-719, 2014. DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-10-2012-0449. ROSTAMZADEH, R. et al. Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS-CRITIC approach. J. of Cleaner Prod., v. 175, p. 651-669, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.071. ROWLEY, J.; SLACK, F. Conducting a literature review. Manage. Res. News, v. 27, p. 31-39, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/01409170410784185. RUIZ-TORRES, A.J.; MAHMOODI, F.; ZENG, A.Z. Supplier Selection Model with Contingency Planning for Supplier Failures. Comput. Ind. Eng., v. 66, p. 374-382, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2013.06.021. SAATY, T.L. Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int. J. of Serv. Sciences, v. 1, n. 1, p. 83-98, 2008. SAATY, T.L. How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Eur. J. of Op. Res., v. 48, n. 1, p. 9-26, 1990. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I. SAATY, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: planning, priority, setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980. SADIK, Z.A.; DATE, P.M.; MITRA, G. Forecasting crude oil futures prices using global macroeconomic news sentimento. IMA J. of Manage. Math., v. 31, n. 2, p. 191-215, 2020. DOI: 10.1093/imaman/dpz011. SAHU, N.K.; SAHU, A.K.; SAHU, A.K. Appraisement and benchmarking of third-party logistic service provider by exploration of risk-based approach. Cogent Bus. & Manage., v. 2, n. 1, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2015.1121637. SAINI, R.; SAINI, S. Improvement in the Energy Supply Chain Risk Management of Oil and Petroleum Industries - using the concept of ANN embedded in SCM. Int. J. of Appl. or Innov. in Enginee. & Manage., v. 3, n. 1, 2014. Disponível em: <https://www.ijaiem.org/volume3issue1/IJAIEM-2014-01-09-020.pdf> Acesso em: 10 jun. 2021. SAKIB, N. et al. An assessment of probabilistic disaster in the oil and gas supply chain leveraging Bayesian belief network. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 235, p. 108107, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108107. SAMVEDI, A.; JAIN, V.; CHAN, F.T.S. Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 51, p. 2433–2442, 2013. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.741330. SANDERS, N.R.; GANESHAN, R. Special issue of production and operations management on “Big Data in supply chain management”. Prod. Oper. Manage., v. 24, n. 5, p. 519-520, 2015. SANTOSO, T. et al. A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Research, v. 167, p. 96-115, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.046. SAWIK, T. Joint Supplier Selection and Scheduling of Customer Orders under Disruption Risks: Single vs. Dual Sourcing. Omega, v. 43, p. 83-95, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2013.06.007. SCHMITT, A.J.; SINGH, M. A quantitative analysis of disruption risk in a multi-echelon supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 139, n. 1, p. 22-32, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.004. SCHOENHERR, T., TUMMALA, V.M.R.; HARRISON, T.P. Assessing Supply Chain Risks with the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Providing Decision Support for the Offshoring Decision by a US Manufacturing Company. J. of Purch. and Supply Manage., v. 14, n. 2, p. 100-111, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2008.01.008. SEBASTIANELLI, R.; TAMIMI, N. Antecedents of sustainable supply chain initiatives: Empirical evidence from the S&P 500. Bus. Soc. Rev., v. 125, p. 3-22, 2020. DOI: 10.1111/basr.12191. SEIFERT, R.W.; THONEMANN, U.W.; HAUSMAN, W.H. Optimal procurement strategies for online spot markets. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 152, n. 3, p. 781-799, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00754-3. SEPTIANI, W. et al. Method and approach mapping for agri-food supply chain risk management: A literature review. Supply Chain Manag., v. 5, n. 2, 2016. Disponível em: <https://ojs.excelingtech.co.uk/index.php/IJSCM/article/view/1179> Acesso em: 10 fev. 2020. SEURING, S. A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decis. Support Syst., v. 54, n. 4, p. 1513-1520, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.053. SEURING, S. Case study research in supply chains - an outline and three examples. In: KOTZAB, H. et al. (Ed.). Research methodologies in supply chain management. Heidelberg: Physica - Verlag, 2005. SEURING, S.; MÜLLER, M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. of Cleaner Prod., v. 16, n. 15, p. 1699-1710, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020. SHAHBAZ, M.S.; RASI, R.Z.R.M.; AHMAD, M.D.F.B. A novel classification of supply chain risks: Scale development and validation. J. of Ind. Enginee. and Manage., vol. 12, n. 1, p. 201-218, 2019. DOI: doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2792. SHAPIRO, J.F. Modeling the supply chain. Belmont: South-Western, 2. ed., 2006. SHARMA, S.K.; BHAT, A. Supply chain risk management dimensions in Indian automobile industry: A cluster analysis approach. Benchmarking: An Int. J., v. 21, n. 6, p. 1023-1040, 2014. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-02-2013-0023. SHARMA, S.; ROUTROY, S. Modeling information risk in supply chain using Bayesian networks. J. Enterp. Infor. Manage., v. 29, n. 2, p. 238-254, 2016. DOI: 10.1108/JEIM-03-2014-0031. SHAVERDI, M. et al. Developing sustainable SCM evaluation model using fuzzy AHP in publishing industry. Procedia Comp. Sci., v. 17, p. 340-349, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.044. SHAW, K. et al. Global supplier selection considering sustainability and carbon footprint issue: AHP multi-objective fuzzy linear programming approach. Int. J. of Op. Res., v. 17, n. 2, p. 215-247, 2013. DOI: 10.1504/IJOR.2013.053624. SHEFFI, Y. Supply chain management under the threat of international terrorism. Int. J. Log. Manag., v. 12, n. 2, p. 1-11, 2001. DOI: 10.1108/09574090110806262. SHEMA, H. “What’s wrong with citation analysis?” 2013. Disponível em: <http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/information-culture/2013/01/01/whats-wrong- with-citation-analysis/> Acesso em: 30 abr. 2020. SHI, D. A review of enterprise supply chain risk management. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng., v. 13, p. 219-244, 2004. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-006-0162-2. SIDOROVA, A. et al. Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Quarterly, v. 32, n. 3, p. 467-482, 2008. DOI: 10.2307/25148852. SILVA, L.M.F. et al. Risk assessment model using conditional probability and simulation: case study in a piped gas supply chain in Brazil. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 59, n. 10, p. 2960-2976, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1744764. SIMANGUNSONG, E.; HENDRY, L.C.; STEVENSON, M. Supply-chain uncertainty: a review and theoretical foundation for future research. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 50, n. 16, p. 4493-4523, 2012. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2011.613864. SIMCHI-LEVI, D. The 6 forces driving supply chain design. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev., v. 51, n. 2, p. 17-24, 2010. SIMIĆ, D. et al. 50 years of fuzzy set theory and models for supplier assessment and selection: A literature review. J. of App. Logic, v. 24, part A, p. 85-96, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jal.2016.11.016. SIMON, H.A. Models of bounded rationality. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1982, 504 p. SINGHAL, P.; AGARWAL, G.; MITTAL, M.L. Supply chain risk management: review, classification and future research directions. Int. J. Bus. Sci. App. Manage., v. 6, n. 3, p. 15-42, 2011. SINHA, A.K. et al. Agent oriented petroleum supply chain coordination: Co-evolutionary Particle Swarm Optimization based approach. Exp. Syst. with App., v. 38, n. 5, p. 6132-6145, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.004. SINHA, P.R.; WHITMAN, L.E.; MALZAHN, D. Methodology to mitigate supplier risk in an aerospace supply chain. Supply Chain Manage.: An Int. J., v. 9, n. 2, p. 154-168, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/13598540410527051. SLACK, N.; BRANDON-JONES, A.; JOHNSTON, R. Operations Management. Harlow: Pearson, 8. ed., 2016. SMALL, H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci., v. 24, n. 4, p. 265-269, 1973. SMALL, H. Visualizing science by citation mapping. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tec., v. 50, n. 9, p. 799-813, 1999. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:93.3.CO;2-7. SMELTZER, L.R.; SIFERD, S.P. Proactive Supply Management: The Management of Risk. Int. J. Purch. Mater. Manag., v. 34, p. 38-45, 1998. DOI:10.1111/j.1745-493X.1998.tb00040.x. SNYDER, L.V. et al. OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review. IISE Trans., v. 48, n. 2, p. 89-109, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2015.1067735. SNYDER, L.V.; DASKIN, M.S.; TEO, C.P. The stochastic location model with risk pooling. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 179, n. 3, p. 1221-1238, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.03.076. SODHI, M.S.; SON, B.G.; TANG, C.S. Researchers' perspectives on supply chain risk management. Prod. Oper. Manage., v. 21, p. 1-13, 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01251.x. SOFYALIOĞLU, Ç.; KARTAL, B. The Selection of Global Supply Chain Risk Management Strategies by Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process - A Case from Turkey. Procedia-Soc. and Beh. Sci., v. 58, 2012. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1131. SOMMERVILLE, I. Engenharia de software. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall, 9. ed., 2011. SON, C.E. Supply Chain Risk Management: A Review of Thirteen Years of Research. Amer. J. Ind. Bus. Manage., v. 8, 2294-2320, 2018. DOI: 10.4236/ajibm.2018.812154. SONG, W.; MING, X.; LIU, H-C. Identifying critical risk factors of sustainable supply chain management: A rough strength-relation analysis method. J. of Cleaner Prod., v. 143, p. 100-115, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.145. STECKE, K.E.; KUMAR, S. Sources of Supply Chain Disruptions, Factors That Breed Vulnerability, and Mitigating Strategies. J. Mark. Chann., v. 16, n. 3, p. 193-226, 2009. DOI: 10.1080/10466690902932551. SYED, M.W. et al. An Empirical Examination of Sustainable Supply Chain Risk and Integration Practices: A Performance-Based Evidence from Pakistan. Sustainability, v. 11, p. 5334, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11195334. TALLURI, S.; NARASIMHAN, R. Vendor Evaluation with Performance Variability: A Max-Min Approach. Eur. J. of Op. Res., v. 146, n. 3, p. 543–552, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00230-8. TALLURI, S.; NARASIMHAN, R.; NAIR, A. Vendor performance with supply risk: a chance-constrained dea approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 100, n. 2, p. 212-222, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.012. TAN, K.H.; WONG, W.P.; CHUNG, L. Information and knowledge leakage in supply chain. Inf. Syst. Frontiers, v. 18, n. 3, p. 621-638, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-015-9553-6 TANG, C.S. Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 103, n. 2, p. 451-488, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006. TANG, C.S.; TOMLIN, B. The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 116, n. 1, p. 12-27, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.008. TANG, O.; MUSA, S.N. Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 133, p. 25-34, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.013. TAZELAAR, F.; SNIJDERS, C. Operational risk assessments by supply chain professionals: process and performance. J. of Op. Manage., v. 31, n. 1, p. 37-51, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2012.11.004. TEUSCHER, P.; GRÜNINGER, B.; FERDINAND, N. Risk management in Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM): Lessons learnt from the case of GMO-free soybeans. Corp. Social Resp. and Env. Manage., v. 13, p. 1-10, 2006. DOI: 10.1002/csr.81. THE ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS SCHOOLS. The Academic Journal Guide 2018. Disponível em: <https://charteredabs.org/academic-journal-guide-2018-view/> Acesso em: 15 abr. 2020. TIAN, J.; YAN, Z.F. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process for Risk Assessment to General-assembling of Satellite. J. of App. Res. and Tech., v. 11, n. 4, p. 568-577, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/S1665-6423(13)71564-5. TOMAS, R.N.; ALCANTARA, R.L.C. Models for risk management in supply chains: review, analysis, and guidelines for research. Gest. & Prod., v. 20, n. 3, p. 695-712, 2013. DOI: 10.1590/S0104-530X2013000300014. TOMLIN, B. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Manage. Sci., v. 52, p. 639-657, 2006. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0515. TRAN, T. H.; DOBROVNIK, M.; KUMMER, S. Supply chain risk assessment: a content analysis-based literature review. Int. J. of Log. Syst. Manage., v. 31, n. 4, p. 562-591, 2018. DOI: 10.1504/IJLSM.2018.096088. TRANFIELD, D.; DENYER, D.; SMART, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Brit. J. Manage., v. 14, p. 207-222, 2003. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375. TSAI, C.Y. On Supply Chain Cash Flow Risks. Dec. Supp. Syst., v. 44, n. 4, p. 1031-1042, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2007.12.006. TSAUR, S.-H.; CHANG, T.-Y.; YEN, C.-H. The evaluation of airline service quality by Fuzzy MCDM. Tour. Manage, v. 23, n. 2, p. 107-115, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00050-4. TSE, Y.K. et al. Quality risk in global supply network. J. of Manuf. Tech. Manage., v. 22, p. 1002-1013, 2011. TUKAMUHABWA, B.R. et al. Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 53, n. 18, p. 5592-5623, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1037934. TUMMALA, R.; SCHOENHERR, T. Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process [SCRMP]. Supply Chain Manage.: An Int. J., v. 16, n. 6, p. 474-483, 2011. DOI: 10.1108/13598541111171165. TUNCEL, G.; ALPAN, G. Risk assessment and management for supply chain networks: A case study. Comput. Ind., v. 61, n. 3, p. 250-259, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2009.09.008. VAIDYA, O.S.; KUMAR, S. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. Eur. J. of Op. Res., v. 169, n. 1, p. 1-29, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028. VAN ECK, N.J.; WALTMAN, L. Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.6. Universiteit Leiden and Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, 2017. VAN ECK, N.J.; WALTMAN, L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: DING, Y.; ROUSSEAU, R.; WOLFRAM, D. (Eds.). Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice , p. 285-320. Suíça: Springer, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13. VAN LAARHOVEN, P.; PEDRYCZ, W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst., v. 11, p. 199-227, 1983. DOI:10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7. VANANY, I.; ZAILANI, S.; PUJAWAN, N. Supply Chain Risk Management: Literature Review and Future Research. Int. J. Infor. Syst. Supply Chain Manage., v. 2, p. 16-33, 2009. DOI: 10.4018/jisscm.2009010102. VENKATESH, V.G.; RATHI, S.; PATWA, S. Analysis on supply chain risks in Indian apparel retail chains and proposal of risk prioritization model using Interpretive structural modeling. J. Retailing Consum. Serv., v. 26, p. 153-167, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.06.001. VISHWAKARMA V.; PRAKASH, C.; BARUA, M.K. A fuzzy-based multi criteria decision making approach for supply chain risk assessment in Indian pharmaceutical industry. Int. J. of Log. Syst. and Manage., v. 25, n. 2, p. 245, 2016. DOI: 10.1504/ijlsm.2016.078915. VISHWAKARMA V.; PRAKASH, C.; BARUA, M.K. Modeling the barriers of Indian Pharmaceutical Supply Chain using fuzzy AHP. Int. J. of Oper. Res., v. 34, n. 2, p. 240-268, 2019. DOI: 10.1504/IJOR.2019.097578. VISWANADHAM, N.; SAMVEDI, A. Supplier Selection Based on Supply Chain Ecosystem, Performance and Risk Criteria. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 51, p. 6484-6498, 2013. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2013.825056. WAGNER, S.M.; NESHAT, N. Assessing the Vulnerability of Supply Chains Using Graph Theory. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 126, n. 1, p. 121-129, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.007. WAGNER, S.M.; BODE, C. An Empirical Examination of Supply Chain Performance Along Several Dimensions of Risk. J. Bus. Logist., v. 29, p. 307-325, 2008. DOI: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2008.tb00081.x. WANG, C.X.; WEBSTER, S. Channel coordination for a supply chain with a risk‐neutral manufacturer and a loss‐averse retailer. Decision Sci., v. 38, p. 361-389, 2007. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00163.x. WANG, J.; SHU, Y.F. Fuzzy decision modeling for supply chain management. Fuzzy Set. Syst., v. 150, p. 107-127, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2004.07.005. WANG, X. et al. A two-stage fuzzy-AHP model for risk assessment of implementing green initiatives in the fashion supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 135, n. 2, p. 595-606, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.03.021. WANG, X.; LI, D.; SHI, X. A fuzzy model for aggregative food safety risk assessment in food supply chains. Prod. Plan. & Control, v. 23, n. 5, p. 377-395, 2012. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2011.561812. WANG, Y.-M.; LUO, Y.; HUA, Z. On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. Eur. J. of Oper. Res., v. 186, n. 2, p. 735-747, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.050. WEC - WORLD ENERGY COUNCIL. World Energy Issues Monitor 2021: Humanising energy. London, 2021. 51 p. Disponível em: <https://www.worldenergy.org/assets/downloads/Issues_Monitor_2021-final.pdf> Acesso em: 20 maio 2021. WEF - WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. 15th The Global Risks Report. 2020. Disponível em: <http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risk_Report_2020.pdf> Acesso em: 15 jul. 2020. WEF - WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. 16th The Global Risks Report. 2021. Disponível em: <http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2021.pdf> Acesso em: 12 fev. 2021. WILLIAMS, Z.; LUEG, J.E.; LEMAY, S.A. Supply chain security: an overview and research agenda. Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 19, n. 2, p. 254 281, 2008. DOI: 10.1108/09574090810895988. WILSON, C. Brainstorming and Beyond: a user-centered design method. Oxford: Morgan Kaufmann, 2013. WU, D.D. et al. Fuzzy multi-objective programming for supplier selection and risk modeling: A possibility approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 200, n. 3, p. 774-787, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.026. WU, D.D.; OLSON, D. Enterprise Risk Management: A DEA VaR Approach in Vendor Selection. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 48, p. 4919-4932, 2010. DOI:10.1080/00207540903051684. WU, K.-J. et al. Toward sustainability: using big data to explore the decisive attributes of supply chain risks and uncertainties. J. of Cleaner Prod., v. 142, part 2, p. 663-676, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.040. WU, T.; BLACKHURST, J.; CHIDAMBARAM, V. A model for inbound supply risk analysis. Comput. Ind., v. 57, n. 4, p. 350-365, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2005.11.001. WU, Z.; CHOI, T.Y.; RUNGTUSANATHAM, M.J. Supplier–supplier Relationships in Buyer–supplier–supplier Triads: Implications for Supplier Performance. J. Oper. Manag., v. 28, p. 115-123, 2010. DOI:10.1016/j.jom.2009.09.002. XU, G. et al. Coordinating a dual-channel supply chain with risk-averse under a two-way revenue sharing contract. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 147 (PART A), p. 171-179, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.09.012. XU, M. et al. Supply chain sustainability risk and assessment. J. of Cleaner Prod., v. 225, p. 857-867, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.307. YADAV, V.; SHARMA, M.K. Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection using fuzzy AHP approach. Benchmarking: An Int. J., v. 2, n. 6, p. 1158-1174, 2015. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-04-2014-0036. YAZDANI, M. et al. A risk-based integrated decision-making model for green supplier selection: A case study of a construction company in Spain. Kybernetes, v. 49, p. 1229-1252, 2019. DOI:10.1108/K-09-2018-0509. YIN, R.K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 5. ed., 2014, 320 p. YOON, J. et al. Models for supplier selection and risk mitigation: a holistic approach. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 56, n. 10, p. 3636-3661, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1403056. YOU, F.; Grossmann, I.E. Design of responsive supply chains under demand uncertainty. Comput. Chem. Eng., v. 32, n. 12, p. 3090-3111, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.05.004. YU, M.C., GOH, M.; LIN, H.C. Fuzzy multi-objective vendor selection under lean procurement. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 219, p. 305-311, 2012. DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.12.028. ZADEH, L. A. Fuzzy sets. Inform. and Control, v. 8, n. 3, p. 338-353, 1965. DOI: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X. ZANJIRCHI, S.M.; JALILIAN, N.; MIRHOSEINI, A. Risk-agility interactive model: a new look at agility drivers. J. of Model. in Manage., v. 12, n. 4, p. 690-711, 2017. DOI: 10.1108/JM2-01-2016-0007 ZAPA, E.; COGOLLO, J. Fuzzy-BSC Methodology for Decision Making in Indemnity Area of Insurance Companies. IEEE Latam Trans., v. 16, p. 2539-2546, 2018. DOI:10.1109/TLA.2018.8795133. ZHONG, R.Y. et al. Intelligent Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Review. Engineering, v. 3, n. 5, p. 616-630, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015. ZHU, Q.; KRIKKE, H.; CANIËLS, M.C.J. Integrated supply chain risk management: a systematic review.  Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 28, n. 4, p. 1123-1141, 2017. DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-09-2016-0206. ZIMMER, K. et al. Assessing social risks of global supply chains: A quantitative analytical approach and its application to supplier selection in the German automotive industry. J. Clean. Prod., v. 149, p. 96-109, 2017. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.041. ZIMMER, K.; FRÖHLING, M.; SCHULTMANN, F. Sustainable supplier management - A review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 54, p. 1412-1442, 2016. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340. ZSIDISIN, G.A. A Grounded Definition of Supply Risk. J. Purch. Supply Manag., v. 9, p. 217–224, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2003.07.002. ZSIDISIN, G.A.; ELLRAM, L.M. An Agency Theory Investigation of Supply Risk Management. The J. of Supply Chain Manage., v. 39, n. 2, p. 15-27, 2003. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2003.tb00156.x. ZSIDISIN, G.A.; ELLRAM, L.M. Supply risk assessment analysis. Practix, Best Pract. in Purch. and Supp. Chain Manage., p. 9-12, 1999. ZSIDISIN, G.A. et al. An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log., v. 34, n. 5, p. 397-413, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/09600030410545445. ZSIDISIN, G.A.; RITCHIE, B. Supply Chain Risk. Suíça: Springer, 2010, 350 p. ZUPIC, I.; CATER, T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ. Res. Methods, v. 18, n. 3, p. 429-472, 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1094428114562629.pt_BR
dc.contributor.refereesLatteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9432902893052167pt_BR
dc.contributor.refereesIDs0000-0002-7618-7049pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Tese (PEI)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Tese_Marcus Fagundes_PEI.UFBA_VF_OFICIAL.pdfTese - Marcus Vinicius C. Fagundes7,21 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.