dc.relation.references | ABDEL-BASSET, M. et al. A framework for risk assessment, management and evaluation: Economic tool for quantifying risks in supply chain. Fut. Gen. Comp. Syst., v. 90, p. 489-502, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2018.08.035. ACKOFF, R.L.; SASIENI, M. W. Fundamentais of operations research. New York: John Wiley, 1968, p. 468.
AGCS - Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty. 10th Allianz Risk Barometer. 2021. Disponível em: < https://www.agcs.allianz.com/news-and-insights/reports/allianz-risk-barometer.html> Acesso em: 10 mai. 2021.
AHMED, F.; KILIC, K. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A performance analysis of various algorithms. Fuzzy Sets Syst., v. 362, p. 110-128, 2019. DOI:10.1016/j.fss.2018.08.009.
ALEKSIĆ, A. et al. Advanced risk assessment in reverse supply chain processes: A case study in Republic of Serbia. Adv. in Prod. Engine. & Manage., v. 14, n. 4, p. 421-434, 2019 DOI: 10.14743/apem2019.4.338.
ALMEIDA, A.T. et al. Multicriteria and multiobjective models for risk, reliability and maintenance decision analysis. Suíça: Springer, 2015, 395 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17969-8.
ALMEIDA, A.T. Processo de decisão nas organizações: construindo modelos de decisão multicritério. São Paulo: Atlas, 2013.
ALOINI, D. et al. Supply chain management: a review of implementation risks in the construction industry. Bus. Proc. Manag. J., v. 18, n. 5, p. 735-761, 2012. DOI: 10.1108/14637151211270135.
ANDERSON, D. R. Corporate Survival: The Critical Importance of Sustainability Risk Management. New York: Universe Publishing, 2005.
ANDERSON, D. R.; ANDERSON, K.E. Sustainability risk management. Risk Manag. Insur. Rev., v. 12, n. 1, p. 25–38, 2009. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6296.2009.01152.x.
ANDRADE, E.L. Introdução à Pesquisa Operacional: Métodos e Modelos para Análise de Decisões. Rio de Janeiro: LTC, 5. ed., 2015, 220 p.
ANP - AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE PETRÓLEO, GÁS NATURAL E BIOCOMBÚSTIVEIS. Anuário estatístico brasileiro do petróleo, gás natural e biocombustíveis: 2020. Rio de Janeiro: ANP, 2008. 268 p. il. Disponível em: <http://www.anp.gov.br/publicacoes/anuario-estatistico/5809-anuario-estatistico-2020> Acesso em: 05 abr. 2021.
ANSOFF, H.I. A nova estratégia empresarial. São Paulo: Atlas, 1990, 268 p.
API - American Petroleum Institute. Oil and Natural Gas Supply Chains, America’s Energy Revolution, Oil Supply Chain [DM2015-036]. 2015. Disponível em: <https://energyinfrastructure.org/energy-101/oil-supply-chain> Acesso em: 8 set. 2020.
APPLEQUIST, G.E.; PEKNY, J.F.; REKLAITIS, G.V. Risk and uncertainty in managing chemical manufacturing supply chains. Comp. Chem. Eng., v. 24, n. 9-10, p. 2211-2222, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00585-8.
AQLAN, F. A software application for rapid risk assessment in integrated supply chains. Exp. Syst. with Applic., v. 43, p. 109-116, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.08.028.
AQLAN, F.; LAM, S.S. Supply chain optimization under risk and uncertainty: A case study for high-end server manufacturing. Comput. Ind. Eng., v. 93, p. 78–87, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2015.12.025.
ASGARI, N. et al. Supply chain management 1982–2015: A review. IMA J. Manag. Math., v. 27, n. 3, p. 353–379, 2016. DOI: 10.1093/imaman/dpw004.
ASTANTI, R. D.; MBOLLA, S.; AI, T. Raw material supplier selection in a glove manufacturing: Application of AHP and fuzzy AHP. Dec. Sci. Letters, v. 9, p. 291-312, 2020. DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2020.5.005.
AVELAR-SOSA, L.; GARCÍA-ALCARAZ, J.L.; CASTRELLÓN-TORRES, J.P. The effects of some risk factors in the supply chains performance: a case of study. J. of App. Res. and Tech., v. 12, n. 5, p. 958-968, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/S1665-6423(14)70602-9.
AWASTHI, A.; GOVINDAN, K.; GOLD, S. Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 195, p. 106-117, 2018. DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013.
BAGHALIAN, A.; REZAPOUR, S.; FARAHANI, R.Z. Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: A real-life case. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 227, n. 1, p. 199-215, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.017.
BAK, O. Supply chain risk management research agenda: From a literature review to a call for future research directions. Bus. Proc. Manag. J., v. 24, n. 2, p. 567-588, 2018. DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-02-2017-0021
BANDALY, D. et al. Supply chain risk management - II: A review of operational, financial and integrated approaches. Risk Manag., v. 15, n. 1, 2013. DOI: 10.1057/rm.2012.8
BASTIAN M.; HEYMANN S.; JACOMY M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: THIRD INT. ICWSM CONFERENCE, p. 361-362, 2009. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Disponível em: <https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/view/154> Acesso em: 05 mar. 2020.
BATAGELJ, V.; MRVAR, A. Pajek: Program for analysis and visualization of large networks - reference manual. Slovenia: University of Ljubljana, 2011.
BEHZADI, G. et al. Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models. Omega, v. 79, p. 21-42, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2017.07.005.
BEN-TAL, A. et al. Robust optimization for emergency logistics planning: Risk mitigation in humanitarian relief supply chains. Transp. Res. Part B: Method., v. 45, n. 8, p. 1177-1189, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.09.002.
BERTRAND, J.W.M.; FRANSOO, J. Modelling and simulation. In: KARLSSON, C. (Ed.). Researching operations management. New York: Routledge, 2009.
BLACKBURN, W. R. The Sustainability Handbook: The Complete Management Guide to Achieving Social, Economic and Environmental Responsibility. London: Earthscan, 2007, 826 p.
BLACKHURST, J. et al. An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 43, n. 19, p. 4067-4081, 2005. DOI: 10.1080/00207540500151549.
BOENDER, C.; DE GRAAN, J.; LOOTSMA, F. Multi-criteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy Sets Syst., v. 29, p. 133-143, 1989. DOI:10.1016/0165-0114(89)90187-5.
BOGATAJ, D.; BOGATAJ, M. Measuring the Supply Chain Risk and Vulnerability in Frequency Space. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 108, p. 291-301, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.12.017.
BOYD, J. COVID-19 Survey: impacts on global supply chains. Institute for Supply Management (ISM). 2020. Disponível em: http://ism.files.cms-plus.com/ISMReport/ISM_Coronavirus%20Survey%20Release_3.11.20_FINAL.pdf. Acesso em: 20 mai. 2020.
BRADLEY, J.R. The complexity of assessing supply chain risk. In: THOMAS, A.R. (ed.). Supply chain Security: International Practices and Innovations in Moving Goods Safely and Efficiently. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2010.
BRANCOLI, P. et al. Bread loss rates at the supplier-retailer interface - Analysis of risk factors to support waste prevention measures. Res., Cons. and Recy., v. 147, p. 128-136, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.027.
BRANDENBURG, M. et al. Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 233, n. 2, p. 299-312, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.032.
BRASIL. Lei n. 6.938, de 31 de agosto de 1981. Dispõe sobre a Política Nacional do Meio Ambiente, seus fins e mecanismos de formulação e aplicação, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União: Brasília, DF, p. 16509, 02 set. 1981. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l6938.htm> Acesso em: 03 jan. 2021.
BRASIL. Lei n. 9.478, de 6 de agosto de 1997. Dispõe sobre a política energética nacional, as atividades relativas ao monopólio do petróleo, institui o Conselho Nacional de Política Energética e a Agência Nacional do Petróleo e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União: Brasília, DF, p. 16925, 07 ago. 1997. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9478.htm> Acesso em: 03 jun. 2020.
BRUNDTLAND, G. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. United Nations General Assembly document A/42/427, 1987.
BRUNO, G. et al. AHP-based approaches for supplier evaluation: Problems and perspectives. J. Purch. Supply Manag., v. 18, p. 159-172, 2012. DOI:10.1016/j.pursup.2012.05.001.
BRYMAN, A. Research methods and organization studies. Londres: Unwin Hyman, 1989.
BUCKLEY, J.J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst., v. 17, p. 233-247, 1985. DOI:10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9.
BUGERT, N.; LASCH, R. Supply chain disruption models: A critical review. Log. Research, v. 11, n. 5, p. 1-35, 2018. DOI: 10.23773/2018_5.
BÜYÜKÖZKAN, G. An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for green supplier evaluation. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 50, p. 2892-2909, 2012.
CARNEIRO, M. C.; RIBAS, G. P.; HAMACHER, S. Risk management in the oil supply chain. A CVaR Approach. Ind. & Enginee. Chem. Res., v. 49, n. 7, p. 3286-3294, 2010. DOI: 10.1021/ie901265n.
CAUCHICK-MIGUEL, P.A.; SOUSA, R. O Método do Estudo de Caso na Engenharia de Produção. In: CAUCHICK-MIGUEL, P.A.C. (Coord.). Metodologia de pesquisa em engenharia de produção e gestão de operações. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 3. ed., 2018.
CERQUEIRA, T.L.; BERTONI, F.C.; PIRES, M.G. Instance Genetic Selection for Fuzzy Rule-based Systems Optimization to Opinion Classification. IEEE Latam Trans., v. 18, p. 1215-1221, 2020. DOI:10.1109/TLA.2020.9099762.
CHAI, J.; LIU, J.N.K.; NGAI, E.W.T. Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert Syst. Appl., v. 40, p. 3872-3885, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040.
CHAI, J.; NGAI, E.W.T. Decision-making techniques in supplier selection: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Exp. Syst. Appl., v. 140, 112903, 2020. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112903.
CHAMODRAKAS, I., BATIS, D.; MARTAKOS, D. Supplier selection in electronic marketplaces using satisficing and fuzzy AHP. Exp. Syst. with App., v. 37, p. 490 - 498, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.043.
CHAN, F.T.S. et al. Global supplier selection: A fuzzy-AHP approach. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 46, n. 14, p. 3825-3857, 2008. DOI: 10.1080/00207540600787200.
CHAN, F.T.S.; CHAN, H.K. An AHP model for selection of suppliers in the fast changing fashion market. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., v. 51, p. 1195-1207, 2010. DOI:10.1007/s00170-010-2683-6.
CHAN, F.T.S.; KUMAR, N. Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, v. 35, n. 4, p. 417-431, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.08.004.
CHANG, D. Y. Extent Analysis and Synthetic Decision: Optimization, Techniques and Applications. Singapore: World Scientific, 1992, 352 p.
CHANG, D.Y. Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 95, p. 649-655, 1996. DOI:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2.
CHAUDHURI, A. et al. A conceptual framework for improving effectiveness of risk management in supply networks. The Int. J. of Log. Manage., v. 31, n. 1, p. 77-98, 2020. DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-11-2018-0289.
CHAUDHURI, A.; MOHANTY, B.K.; SINGH, K.N. Supply Chain Risk Assessment during New Product Development: A Group Decision Making Approach Using Numeric and Linguistic Data. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 51, p. 2790-2804, 2013. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2012.654922.
CHEN, P.-S.; WU, M.-T. A Modified Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Method for Supplier Selection Problems in the Supply Chain Risk Environment: A Case Study. Comput. Ind. Eng., v. 66, p. 634-642, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2013.09.018.
CHICKSAND, D. et al. Theoretical perspectives in purchasing and supply chain management: An analysis of the literature. Supply Chain Manage., v. 17, p. 454-472, 2012.
CHIU, C.H.; CHOI, T.M. Supply chain risk analysis with mean-variance models: A technical review. Ann. Oper. Res., v. 240, n. 2, p. 489-507, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-013-1386-4.
CHO, D. W. et al. A framework for measuring the performance of service supply chain management. Comp. & Ind. Enginee., v. 62, n. 3, p. 801–818, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.014.
CHOI, T.Y.; DOOLEY, K.J.; RUNGTUSANATHAM, M. Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: control versus emergence. J. Oper. Manage., v. 19, n. 3, p. 351-366, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00068-1.
CHOPRA, S.; REINHARDT, G.; MOHAN, U. The importance of decoupling recurrent and disruption risks in a supply chain. Naval Res. Log., v. 54, n. 5, p. 544-555, 2007. DOI: 10.1002/nav.20228.
CHOPRA, S.; SODHI, M. S. Managing Risk to Avoid Supply-chain Breakdown. MIT Sloan Manage. Review, v. 46, n. 53-62, 2004. Disponível em: <https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/managing-risk-to-avoid-supplychain-breakdown/> Acesso em: 03 set. 2020.
CHRISTOPHER, M. et al. Approaches to managing global sourcing risk. Supply Chain Manage.: An Int. J., v. 16, n. 2, p. 67-81, 2011. DOI: 10.1108/13598541111115338.
CHRISTOPHER, M. et al. Understanding supply chain risk: A self-assessment workbook. Dep. for Transp., Cranfield University: 2003. Disponivel em: <http://hdl.handle.net/1826/4373> Acesso em: 31 maio 2020.
CHRISTOPHER, M.; LEE, H. Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log., v. 34, n. 5, p. 388-396, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/09600030410545436.
CHRISTOPHER, M.; PECK, H. Building the resilient supply chain. The Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 15, n. 2, p. 1-14, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/09574090410700275.
CLIFT, R. Metrics for supply chain sustainability. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, v. 5, p. 240–247, 2003. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-003-0220-0.
COBO, M.J. et al. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tec., v. 62, p. 1382-1402, 2011. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21525.
COLICCHIA, C. et al. Information sharing in supply chains: a review of risks and opportunities using the systematic literature network analysis (SLNA). Supply Chain Manage.: An Int. J., v. 24, n. 1, p. 5-21, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-01-2018-0003.
COLICCHIA, C.; STROZZI, F. Supply chain risk management: a new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manag., n. 17, v. 4, p. 403-418, 2012. DOI: 10.1108/13598541211246558.
COUSINS, P.D.; LAMMING, R.C.; BOWEN, F. The role of risk in environment‐related supplier initiatives. Int. J. of Oper. & Prod. Manage., v. 24, n. 6, p. 554-565, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/01443570410538104.
CRAIGHEAD, C.W. et al. The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sci., v. 38, p. 131-156, 2007. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00151.x.
CRONIN, B.; DING, Y. Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem. Infor. Proc. Manage., v. 47, p. 80-96, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2010.01.002.
CRUZ, J. M. Mitigating global supply chain risks through corporate social responsibility. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 51, n. 13, p. 3995-4010, 2013. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.762134.
CUCCHIELLA, F.; GASTALDI, M. Risk management in supply chain: A real option approach. J. Manuf. Techno. Manage., v. 17, n. 6, p. 700-720, 2006. DOI: 10.1108/17410380610678756.
DAMERT, M. et al. Motivating low-carbon initiatives among suppliers: The role of risk and opportunity perception. Res., Cons. and Recy., v. 136, pp. 276-286, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.002.
DEBACKERE, K.; VEUGELERS, R. The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Res. Policy, v. 34 n. 3, p. 321-342, 2005. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.003
DÍAZ-CURBELO, A.; ESPIN ANDRADE, R.A.; GENTO MUNICIO, Á.M. The Role of Fuzzy Logic to Dealing with Epistemic Uncertainty in Supply Chain Risk Assessment: Review Standpoints. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., v. 22, p. 2769-2791, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s40815-020-00846-5.
DING, Q.; DONG, L.; KOUVELIS, P. On the integration of production and financial hedging decisions in global markets. Oper. Res., v. 55, n. 3, p. 470-489, 2007. DOI: 10.1287/opre.1070.0364.
DU, S. et al. Game-theoretic analysis for an emission-dependent supply chain in a ‘cap-and-trade’ system. Ann. Oper. Res., v. 228, n. 1, p. 135-149, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-011-0964-6.
EGRI, P. A centralized/decentralized design of a full return contract for a risk-free manufacturer and a risk- neutral retailer under partial information sharing: a discussion. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 141, n. 1, p. 437-438, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.07.016.
ELLIS, S. C.; HENRY, R. M.; SHOCKLEY, J. Buyer Perceptions of Supply Disruption Risk: A Behavioral View and
Empirical Assessment. J. Oper. Manag., v. 28, p. 34-46, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2009.07.002.
EMROUZNEJAD, A.; HO, W. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017. DOI: 10.1201/9781315369884.
ENDNOTE WEB. 2020. Disponível em: <http://www.myendnoteweb.com> Acesso em: 04 mar. 2020.
ENYINDA, C. I. et al. Petroleum Supply Chain Risk Analysis in a Multinational Oil Firm in Nigeria. J. of Mark. Develop. and Competitiv., v. 5, n. 7, p. 37-44, 2011. Disponível em: <https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Petroleum-Supply-Chain-Risk-Analysis-in-a-Firm-in-Enyinda-Briggs/e63c5d98d1b3a66db01329579f6ca7ed4d346c34> Acesso em: 11 jun. 2020.
ER KARA, M.; FIRAT, S.Ü.O. Supplier Risk Assessment Based on Best-Worst Method and K-Means Clustering: A Case Study. Sustainability, v. 10, 1066, 2018. DOI:10.3390/su10041066.
ESKANDARPOUR, M. et al. Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review. Omega, v. 54, p. 11-32, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.01.006.
ESMAEILIKIA, M. et al. Tactical supply chain planning models with inherent flexibility: Definition and review. Ann. Oper. Res., v. 244, n. 2, p. 407-427, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-014-1544-3.
FAGUNDES, M.V.C. et al. Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: literature mapping and future research agenda. Eur. Res. on Manage. and Bus. Econo., v. 26, n. 2, p. 63-70, 2020a. DOI: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.02.001.
FAGUNDES, M.V.C. et al. Multicriteria decision-making system for supplier selection considering risk: a computational Fuzzy AHP-based approach. IEEE Latin Am. Trans., v. 19, n. 9, p. 1564-1572, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/TLA.2021.9468610.
FAGUNDES, M.V.C. et al. Projeto de desenvolvimento de modelo de inteligência artificial para gestão de riscos da cadeia de suprimentos de energia. In: VI CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ESTUDOS ORGANIZACIONAIS (CBEO), 6., ago. 28-31, 2019, Recife (PE). Anais [...]. Recife (PE): UFPE, 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.even3.com.br/anais/vicbeo/168365-projeto-de-desenvolvimento-de-modelo-de-inteligencia-artificial-para-gestao-de-riscos-da-cadeia-de-suprimentos-de/> Acesso em: 03 mai. 2021.
FAGUNDES, M.V.C. et al. Quantitative and computational modeling for supply chain risk management: review and bibliometric analysis. In: XXI SEMINÁRIOS EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO (SEMEAD) e XIII RESEARCH WORKSHOP ON INSTITUTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS (RWIO), 21., nov. 7-9, 2018, São Paulo (SP). Anais [...]. São Paulo (SP): USP, 2018. Disponível em: <https://login.semead.com.br/21semead/anais/resumo.php?cod_trabalho=598> Acesso em: 20 ago. 2021.
FAGUNDES, M.V.C. et al. Seleção de áreas para licitações através do método TOPSIS. In: XVII CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ENERGIA (CBE), 17., nov. 21-22, 2017, Rio de Janeiro (RJ). Anais [...]. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): CBE, 2017.
FAGUNDES, M.V.C. et al. Supply chain risk management modelling: a systematic literature network analysis review. IMA J. Manage. Math., v. 31, n. 4, p. 387-416, 2020b. DOI: 10.1093/imaman/dpaa019.
FAGUNDES, M.V.C.; FREIRES, F.G.M.; VIEIRA DE MELO, S.B.A. Strategic management model supply chain risk upstream oil and natural gas fields mature onshore. In: 5TH PRODUCTION & OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT WORLD CONFERENCE: Joining P&OM Forces Worldwide, Present and Future of Operations Management (P&OM), 5., set. 6-10, 2016, Havana - Cuba.
FAGUNDES, M.V.C.; HELLINGRATH, B.; FREIRES, F.G.M. Supplier selection risk: a new computer-based decision-making system with Fuzzy Extended AHP. Logistics, v. 5, n. 13, 17 p., 2021. DOI: 10.3390/logistics5010013.
FAGUNDES, M.V.C.; MARQUES, R.S.; FREIRES, F.G.M. Gestão da cadeia de suprimentos para sistemas de energias renováveis: conceitos e reflexões sobre a realidade brasileira. In: XXXVI ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ENGENHARIA DE PRODUÇÃO (ENEGEP), 36., out. 3-6, 2016, João Pessoa (PB). Anais [...]. João Pessoa (PB): ABEPRO, 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.abepro.org.br/biblioteca/TN_STO_236_374_29904.pdf> Acesso em 12 abr. 2021.
FAHIMNIA, B. et al. Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 247, p. 1-15, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.034.
FAISAL, M.N.; BANWET, D.K.; SHANKAR, R. Quantification of risk mitigation environment of supply chains using graph theory and matrix methods. Eur. J. Ind. Eng., v. 1, p. 22-39, 2007. DOI: 10.1504/EJIE.2007.012652.
FAN, Y.; HEILIG, L.; VOSS, S. Supply chain risk management in the Era of Big Data. In: MARCUS A. (Ed.) Design, user experience, and usability: Design discourse. Lect. Notes Comput. Sc., v. 9186. Suíça: Springer, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20886-2_27.
FAN, Y.; STEVENSON, M. A review of supply chain risk management: Definition, theory, and research agenda. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log., v. 48, n. 3, p. 205-230, 2018. DOI: 10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0043.
FANG, C.; LIAO, X.; XIE, M. A Hybrid Risks-informed Approach for the Selection of Supplier Portfolio. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 54, p. 2019-2034, 2016. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2015.1076947.
FERNANDES, L. J.; BARBOSA-PÓVOA, A. P. F. D.; RELVAS, S. I. C. Risk Management Framework for the Petroleum Supply Chain. Comp. Aided Chem. Enginee., v. 28, p. 157-162, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/S1570-7946(10)28027-6.
FERNANDES, R. Engenharia de software. Curitiba: Fael, 2017, 263 p.
FINCH, P. Supply chain risk management. Supply Chain Manage., v. 9, n. 2, p. 183-196, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/13598540410527079.
FLOR, A. J. Análise de Risco Financeiro em Projetos do Setor de Petróleo e Gás. In: SIMPÓSIO DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO E TECNOLOGIA (SEGeT), 9., 2012, Rezende. Anais eletrônicos [...]. Rezende: AEDB, 2012. Disponível em: <https://www.aedb.br/seget/arquivos/artigos12/44316466.pdf> Acesso em: 15 jun. 2021.
FOERSTL, K. et al. Managing supplier sustainability risks in a dynamically changing environment - Sustainable supplier management in the chemical industry. J. of Purch. and Supp. Manage., v. 16, n. 2, p. 118-130, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2010.03.011.
FRIDAY, D. et al. Collaborative risk management: a systematic literature review. Int. J. of Physical Distrib. and Log. Manage., v. 48, n. 3, p. 231-253, 2018. DOI: 10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0035.
FUNDO MONETÁRIO INTERNACIONAL [FMI]. 2020. World Economic Outlook 2020: Chapter 1 The Great Lockdown. Washington: 2020. Disponível em:<https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/04/14/weo-april-2020> Acesso em: 10 jul. 2020.
GANGA, G.M.D. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso [TCC] na Engenharia de Produção: um guia prático de conteúdo e forma. São Paulo: Atlas, 2012, 384 p.
GANGULY, K.; KUMAR, G. Supply Chain Risk Assessment: a fuzzy AHP approach. Oper. and Supp. Chain Manage.: An Int. Journal, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1-13, 2019. DOI: 10.31387/oscm0360217.
GANGULY, K.K.; GUIN, K.K. A fuzzy AHP approach for inbound supply risk assessment. Benchmarking: An Int. J., v. 20, n. 1, p. 129-146, 2013. DOI: 10.1108/14635771311299524.
GARFIELD, E. The History and meaning of the Journal Impact Factor. JAMA: The J. Am. Med. Assoc., v. 295, p. 90-93, 2006. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.1.90.
GARVEY, M.D.; CARNOVALE, S.; YENIYURT, S. An analytical framework for supply network risk propagation: A bayesian network approach. Eur. J. of Oper. Res., v. 243, p. 618–627, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.10.034.
GAUDENZI, B.; BORGHESI, A. Managing risks in the supply chain using the AHP method. The Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 17, n. 1, p. 114-136, 2006. DOI: 10.1108/09574090610663464.
GEBRESLASSIE, B.H.; YAO, Y.; YOU, F. Design under uncertainty of hydrocarbon biorefinery supply chains: Multiobjective stochastic programming models, decomposition algorithm, and a comparison between CVaR and downside risk. AIChE J., v. 58, p. 2155-2179, 2012. DOI:10.1002/aic.13844.
GHADGE, A. et al. A systems approach for modelling supply chain risks. Supply Chain Manage., v. 18, n. 5, p. 523-538, 2013. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-11-2012-0366.
GHADGE, A. et al. Managing cyber risk in supply chains: a review and research agenda. Supp. Chain Manage., v. 25, n. 2, p. 223-240, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-10-2018-0357.
GHADGE, A.; DANI, S.; KALAWSKY, R. Supply chain risk management: present and future scope. Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 23, n. 3, p. 313-339, 2012. DOI: 10.1108/09574091211289200.
GIANNAKIS, M.; LOUIS, M. A multi-agent based framework for supply chain risk management. J. of Purch. and Supply Manage., v. 17, n. 1, p. 23-31, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2010.05.001.
GIANNAKIS, M.; PAPADOPOULOS, T. Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 171, part 4, p. 455-470, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.032.
GILAT, A.; SUBRAMANIAM, V. Métodos Numéricos para Engenheiros e Cientistas [recurso eletrônico]: uma introdução com aplicações usando o MATLAB. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2008, 480 p.
GOLD, S.; AWASTHI, A. Sustainable global supplier selection extended towards sustainability risks from (1+n)th tier suppliers using fuzzy AHP based approach. IFAC-PapersOnLine, v. 48, n 3, p. 966-971, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.208.
GOUDA, S. K; SARANGA, H. Sustainable supply chains for supply chain sustainability: impact of sustainability efforts on supply chain risk. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 56, n. 17, p. 5820-5835, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1456695.
GUERTLER, B.; SPINLER, S. Supply risk interrelationships and the derivation of key supply risk indicators. Tech. Forec. and Social Change, v. 92, pp. 224-236, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.004.
GULER, D. Fuzzy AHP (Chang) (Liou, Wang). MATLAB Central File Exchange. Disponível em: <https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/66688-fuzzy-ahp-chang-liou-wang> Acesso em: 18 de mar. 2022.
HAHN, G. J.; KUHN, H. Value-based Performance and Risk Management in Supply Chains: A Robust Optimization Approach. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 139, n. 1, p. 135-144, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.04.002.
HALLDÓRSSON, A.; KOTZAB, H.; SKJØTT-LARSEN, T. Supply chain management on the crossroad to sustainability: a blessing or a curse? Logist. Res., v. 1, p. 83–94, 2009. DOI: s/n.
HALLIKAS, J.; VIROLAINEN, V.M.; TUOMINEN, M. Risk analysis and assessment in network environments: a dyadic case study. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 78, n. 1, p. 45-55, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00098-6.
HARLAND, C.; BRENCHLEY, R.; WALKER, H. Risk in supply networks. J. Purch. Supp. Manage., v. 9, n. 2, p. 51-62, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S1478-4092(03)00004-9.
HARWOOD, I; HUMBY, S. Embedding corporate responsibility into supply: A snapshot of progress. Eur. Manage. J., v. 26, n. 3, p. 166-174, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2008.01.005.
HAZEN, B. T. et al. Data quality for data science, predictive analytics, and Big Data in supply chain management: An introduction to the problem and suggestions for research and applications. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 154, p. 72–80, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.04.018.
HECKMANN, I.; COMES, T.; NICKEL, S. A critical review on supply chain risk: Definition, measure and modeling. Omega, v. 52, p. 119-132, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.004.
HENDRICKS, K.B.; SINGHAL, V.R. An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long‐run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Prod. Oper. Manage., v. 14, p. 35-52, 2005. DOI:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00008.x.
HENDRICKS, K.B.; SINGHAL, V.R. The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. J. Oper. Manage., v. 21, n. 5, p. 501-522, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2003.02.003.
HIRSCH, J. E. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 102, n. 46, p. 16569-16572, 2005. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
HMIEL, B. et al. Preindustrial 14CH4 indicates greater anthropogenic fossil CH4 emissions. Nature, v. 578, p. 409 - 412, 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-1991-8.
HO, W. et al. Supply chain risk management: A literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 53, n. 16, p. 5031-5069, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467.
HO, W., XU, X., DEY, P.K. Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 202, n. 1, p. 16-24, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009.
HOFMANN, H. et al. Sustainability‐Related Supply Chain Risks: Conceptualization and Management. Bus. Strat. Env., v. 23, p. 160-172, 2014. DOI:10.1002/bse.1778.
HOLMSTRÖM, J. et al. The Digitalization of Operations and Supply Chain Management: Theoretical and Methodological Implications. J. of Oper. Manage., v. 65, n. 8, p. 728-734, 2019. DOI: 10.1002/joom.1073.
HUDNURKAR M. et al. Supply Chain Risk Classification Schemes: A Literature Review. Oper. and Supply Chain Manage., v. 10, n. 4, p. 182-199, 2017. DOI: 10.31387/oscm0290190.
HUNG, S. J. Activity-based Divergent Supply Chain Planning for Competitive Advantage in the Risky Global Environment: A DEMATEL-ANP Fuzzy Goal Programming Approach. Exp. Syst. with App., v. 38, pp 9053-9062, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.024.
IBP - INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE PETRÓLEO E GÁS. Média de produção de petróleo dos poços onshore (barril por dia) - fev. 2019. Rio de Janeiro, 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.ibp.org.br/observatorio-do-setor/snapshots/media-de-producao-de-petroleo-dos-pocos-onshore/> Acesso em: 10 abr. 2021.
IEA - INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY. Global Energy Review 2021: Assessing the effects of economic recoveries on global energy demand and CO2 emissions in 2021. France, 2021a. 36 p. Disponível em: <https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2021> Acesso em: 5 abr. 2021.
IEA - INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY. Net Zero by 2050: A roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. France, 2021b. 224 p. Disponível em: <https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050> Acesso em: 30 abr. 2021.
IOANNIDOU, D. et al. Evaluating the risks in the construction wood product system through a criticality assessment framework. Res., Cons. and Recy., v. 146, p. 68-76, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.021.
ISM - INSTITUTE FOR SUPPLY MANAGEMENT. COVID-19 and supply chains: increasing impacts, decreasing revenues. Disponível em: <https://weareism.org/docs/White-Paper-Corona-V2.pdf> Acesso em: 20 dez. 2020.
JAIN, N.; SINGH, A.R. Sustainable supplier selection under must-be criteria through Fuzzy inference system. J. Clean. Prod., v. 248, 119275, 2020. DOI:0.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119275.
JHARKHARIA, S.; SHANKAR, R. Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process ANP approach. Omega, v. 35, p. 274-289, 2007. DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2005.06.005.
JOHN, A. et al. An integrated fuzzy risk assessment for seaport operations. Saf. Sci., v. 68, p. 180-194, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.001.
JUNG, C.F. Metodologia Científica: ênfase em pesquisa tecnológica. 4. ed., 2004. Disponível em: < http://www.jung.pro.br/moodle/> Acesso em: 31 jun. 2021.
JÜTTNER, U. Supply chain risk management: Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. The Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 16, n. 1, p. 120-141, 2005. DOI: 10.1108/09574090510617385.
JÜTTNER, U., PECK, H.; CHRISTOPHER, M. Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. Int. J. Logist - Res. App., v. 6, n. 4, p. 197-210, 2003. DOI: 10.1080/13675560310001627016.
KABRA, G.; RAMESH, A.; ARSHINDER, K. Identification and prioritization of coordination barriers in humanitarian supply chain management. Int. J. of Disaster Risk Reduc., v. 13, p. 128-138, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.011.
KACHE, F.; SEURING, S. Challenges and opportunities of digital information at the intersection of Big Data Analytics and supply chain management. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage., v. 37, n. 1, p. 10-36, 2017. DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-02-2015-0078.
KAFA, N.; JAEGLER, A.; SARKIS, J. Harnessing Corporate Sustainability Decision-Making Complexity: A Field Study of Complementary Approaches. Sustainability, v. 12, 10584, 2020. DOI:10.3390/su122410584.
KAHRAMAN, C. Multi-criteria decision making methods and Fuzzy sets. In: KAHRAMAN, C. (Ed). Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Development. Istanbul: Springer, 2008. Disponível em:<https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387768120> Acesso em: 11 dez. 2020.
KAHRAMAN, C.; CEBECI, U.; ULUKAN; Z. Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Log. Inf. Manage., v. 16, n. 6, p. 382–394, 2003. DOI: 10.1108/09576050310503367.
KERAMATI, A. et al. A novel methodology for evaluating the risk of CRM projects in fuzzy environment. Neural Comput. & App., v. 23, p. 29-53, 2013. DOI:10.1007/s00521-012-1216-7.
KERN, D. et al. Supply risk management: model development and empirical analysis. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log., v. 42, n. 1, p. 60-82, 2012. DOI: 10.1108/09600031211202472.
KEXIN, B; PING, H.; HUI, Y. Risk identification, evaluation and response of low-carbon technological innovation under the global value chain: A case of the Chinese manufacturing industry. Tech. Forec. and Social Change, v. 100, p. 238-248, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.005.
KHAN, F.I.; SADIQ, R.; HADDARA, M.M. Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance (RBIM): Multi-Attribute Decision-Making with Aggregative Risk Analysis. Proc. Safe. and Env. Protec., v. 82, n. 6, p. 398-411, 2004. DOI: 10.1205/psep.82.6.398.53209.
KHAN, O.; BURNES, B. Risk and supply chain management: Creating a research agenda. Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 18, n. 2, p. 197-216, 2007. DOI: 10.1108/09574090710816931.
KHAN, S. et al. Prioritising the risks in Halal food supply chain: an MCDM approach. J. of Islamic Mark., v. ahead-of-print, n. ahead-of-print, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/JIMA-10-2018-0206.
KHOJASTEH, Y. Supply Chain Risk Management: Advanced Tools, Models, and Developments. Suíça: Springer, 2018, 334 p.
KILINCCI, O.; ONAL, S.A. Fuzzy ahp approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Exp. Syst. with App., v. 38, n. 8, p. 9656–9664, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.159.
KILUBI, I. The strategies of supply chain risk management - a synthesis and classification. Int. J. Log. Res. Applications, v. 19, n. 6, p. 604-629, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2016.1150440.
KILUBI, I.; HAASIS, H. Supply chain risk management enablers - A framework development through systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2015. Int. J. Bus. Sci. App. Manage, v. 10, p. 35-54, 2015.
KIRILMAZ, O.; EROL, S. A proactive approach to supply chain risk management: shifting orders among suppliers to mitigate the supply side risks. J. of Purch. and Supply Manage., v. 23, n. 1, p. 54-65, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2016.04.002.
KLEINDORFER, P. R.; SAAD, G. H. Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Prod. and Oper. Manage., v. 14, n. 1, p. 53-68, 2005. DOI:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00009.x.
KLIBI, W.; MARTEL, A.; GUITOUNI, A. The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: A critical review. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 203, p. 283-293, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.06.011.
KÖCHE, J.C. Fundamentos de metodologia científica: teoria da ciência e iniciação à pesquisa. 34. ed. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2014, 184 p.
KONYS, A. Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From a Literature Review to a Comprehensive Knowledge Base. Sustainability, v. 11, 4208, 2019. DOI:10.3390/su11154208.
KOTZAB, H. et al. (Ed.). Research methodologies in supply chain management. Heidelberg: Physica - Verlag, 2005.
KOUL, S.; VERMA, R. Dynamic vendor selection based on fuzzy AHP. J. Manuf. Tech. Manage., v. 22, n. 8, p. 963–971, 2011. DOI: 10.1108/17410381111177421.
KUBLER, S. et al. A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications. Exp. Syst. with App., v. 65, p. 398-422, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.064.
KULL, T.J.; TALLURI, S. A supply risk reduction model using integrated multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., v. 55, n. 3, p. 409-419, 2008. DOI:10.1109/TEM.2008.922627.
KUMAR D.; GARG, C.P. Evaluating sustainable supply chain indicators using Fuzzy AHP: Case of Indian automotive industry. Benchmarking: An Int. J., v. 24, n. 6, p. 1742-1766, 2017. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-11-2015-0111.
KUMAR, J.; ROY, N. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for a power transmission industry to vendor selection decisions. Int. J. Comput. Appl., v. 12, p. 26-30, 2011. DOI:10.5120/1727-2336.
KUMAR, M.; VRAT, P.; SHANKAR, R. A Fuzzy Programming Approach for Vendor Selection Problem in a Supply Chain. Int. J. Prod. Econo., v. 101, p. 273-285, 2006. DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.01.005.
LAVASTRE, O.; GUNASEKARAN, A., SPALANZANI, A. Effect of firm characteristics, supplier relationships and techniques used on Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM): an empirical investigation on French industrial firms. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 52, n. 11, 3381-3403, 2014. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2013.878057.
LAVASTRE, O.; GUNASEKARAN, A.; SPALANZANI, A. Supply chain risk management in french companies. Dec. Supp. Syst., v. 52, n. 4, p. 828-838, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2011.11.017.
LAW, A.M.; KELTON, W.D. Simulation Modeling and Analysis. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 3. ed., 2000.
LEE, A.H.I. A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Expert Syst. Appl., v. 36, p. 2879-2893, 2009. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.045.
LEE, H.L.; WHANG, S. Information sharing in a supply chain. Int. J. of Tech. Manage., v. 20, n. 3/4, p. 373-387, 2000. DOI: 10.1504/IJMTM.2000.001329.
LI, G. et al. Joint supply chain risk management: an agency and collaboration perspective. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 164, p. 83-94, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.021.
LI, M. et al. Risk assessment of supply chain for pharmaceutical excipients with AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., v. 42, n. 4, p. 676-684, 2016. DOI: 10.3109/03639045.2015.1075027.
LIMA JUNIOR, F.R.; OSIRO, L.; CARPINETTI, L.C.R. Multicriteria decision methods for supplier selection: A literature review on the state of the art. Gest. Prod., v. 20, p. 781-801, 2013. DOI:10.1590/S0104-530X2013005000005.
LIU, Z.; NAGURNEY, A. Supply Chain Outsourcing under Exchange Rate Risk and Competition. Omega: The Int. J. Manage. Sci., v. 39, p. 539-549, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2010.11.003.
LOCKAMY, A.; MCCORMACK, K. Analysing Risks in Supply Networks to Facilitate Outsourcing Decisions. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 48, p. 593-611, 2010. DOI:10.1080/00207540903175152.
LUBISCO, N.M.L.; VIEIRA, S.C. Manual de estilo acadêmico: trabalhos de conclusão de curso, dissertações e teses. 6. ed. Salvador: EDUFBA, 2019. 158 p.
MA, R.M.; YAO, L.F.; HUANG, R. The Green Supply Chain Management Risk Analysis. Adv. Mat. Res., v. 573–574, p. 734–739, 2012. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.573-574.734.
MANGLA, S.K.; KUMAR, P.; BARUA, M.K. An integrated methodology of FTA and fuzzy AHP for risk assessment in green supply chain. Int. J. of Op. Res., v. 25, n. 1, p. 77-99, 2016. DOI: 10.1504/IJOR.2016.073252.
MANGLA, S.K.; KUMAR, P.; BARUA, M.K. Flexible Decision Approach for Analysing Performance of Sustainable Supply Chains Under Risks/Uncertainty. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manage., v. 15, p. 113-130, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s40171-014-0059-8.
MANGLA, S.K.; KUMAR, P.; BARUA, M.K. Flexible decision modeling for evaluating the risks in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP and IRP methodologies. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manage., v. 16, n. 1, p. 19-35, 2015a. DOI: 10.1007/s40171-014-0081-x.
MANGLA, S.K.; KUMAR, P.; BARUA, M.K. Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: A case study. Res., Cons. and Recy., v. 104, part B, p. 375-390, 2015b. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.01.001.
MANUJ, I.; MENTZER, J.T. Global supply chain risk management. J. Bus. Logist., v. 29, n. 1, p. 133, 2008. DOI: 10.1108/09600030810866986.
MARCH, J.; SHAPIRA, Z. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Manage. Sci., v. 33, n. 11, p. 1404-1418, 1987. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1404.
MARCONI, M.A.; LAKATOS, E.M. Fundamentos de Metodologia Científica. São Paulo: Atlas, 9. ed., 2021, 368 p.
MARTINS, R.A. Abordagens quantitativa e qualitativa. In: CAUCHICK-MIGUEL, P.A.C. (Coord.). Metodologia de pesquisa em engenharia de produção e gestão de operações. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 3. ed., 2018.
MAVI, R.K. et al. Identification and Assessment of Logistical Factors to Evaluate a Green Supplier Using the Fuzzy Logic DEMATEL Method. Polish J. of Env. Stud., v. 22, n. 2, p. 445-455, 2013. Disponível em: <http://www.pjoes.com/Identification-and-Assessment-of-Logistical-Factors-r-nto-Evaluate-a-Green-Supplier,88997,0,2.html> Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.
MEENA, P.; SARMAH, S.; SARKAR, A. Sourcing Decisions under Risks of Catastrophic Event Disruptions. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., v. 47, p. 1058-1074, 2011. DOI:10.1016/j.tre.2011.03.003.
MEIXNER, O. Fuzzy AHP group decision analysis and its application for the evaluation of energy sources. In: INT. SYMP. ON THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY/NETWORK PROCESS, 10., 2009, Pittsburgh. Proceedings [...] v. 29, p. 2-16, 2009. Disponível em: <https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/FUZZY-AHP-GROUP-DECISION-ANALYSIS-AND-ITS-FOR-THE-Meixner/561437552bd5a048641b80fbf4e4654035db700f> Acesso: 10 abr. 2020.
MICHELI, G.J.L.; CAGNO, E.; ZORZINI, M. Supply risk management vs supplier selection to manage the supply risk in the EPC supply chain. Manag. Res. News, v. 31, p. 846-866, 2008. DOI:10.1108/01409170810913042.
MINTZBERG, H.; QUINN, J. B. O processo da estratégia. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 3. ed., 2003, 408 p.
MISHRA, B.K.; RAGHUNATHAN, S. Retailer- vs. Vendor-managed inventory and brand competition. Manage. Sci., v. 50, n. 4, p. 445-457, 2004. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0174.
MISHRA, D. et al. Big Data and supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. Ann. Oper. Res., v. 270, p. 313-336, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-016-2236-y.
MITCHELL, V.-W. Organizational risk perception and reduction: a literature review. British J. of Manage., v. 6, n. 2, p. 115-133, 1995. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.1995.tb00089.x.
MOGHADDAM, K.S. Supplier Selection and Order Allocation in Closed-loop Supply Chain Systems Using Hybrid Monte Carlo Simulation and Goal Programming. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 53, p. 6320-6338, 2015. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2015.1054452.
MOHIB, A.M.N.; DEIF, A. M. Supply chain multi-state risk assessment using universal generating function. Prod. Plan. and Control, v. 31, n. 9, p. 699-708, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1680891.
MULHALL, R.A.; BRYSON, J. R. Energy price risk and the sustainability of demand side supply chains, App. Energy, v. 123, p. 327-334, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.018.
NAGURNEY, A. et al. Supply chain networks, electronic commerce, and supply side and demand side risk. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 164, n. 1, p. 120-142, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.11.007.
NANDI, S. et al. Redesigning Supply Chains using Blockchain-Enabled Circular Economy and COVID-19 Experiences. Sust. Prod. and Cons., v. 27, p. 10-22, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.019.
NASSAR, S. et al. Automotive recall risk: impact of buyer-supplier relationship on supply chain social sustainability. Int. J. of Prod. and Perf. Manage., v. 69, n. 3, p. 467-487, 2020. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2019-0026.
NATARAJARATHINAM, M.; CAPAR, I.; NARAYANAN, A. Managing supply chains in times of crisis: a review of literature and insights. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log., v. 39, n. 7, p. 535-573, 2009. DOI: 10.1108/09600030910996251.
NAZAM, M. et al. A Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Framework for the Risk Assessment of Green Supply Chain Implementation in the Textile Industry. Int. J. of Supp. and Operat. Manage., v. 2, n. 1, p. 548-568, 2015. DOI: 10.22034/2015.1.02.
NETO, R.M.; PUREZA, V. Modelagem e simulação. In: CAUCHICK-MIGUEL, P.A.C. (Coord.). Metodologia de pesquisa em engenharia de produção e gestão de operações. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 3. ed., 2018.
NGAN, S.L. et al. A Novel Risk Assessment Model for Green Finance: the Case of Malaysian Oil Palm Biomass Industry. Proc. Integr. Optim. Sustain., v. 3, p. 75–88, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s41660-018-0043-4.
NORRMAN, A.; JANSSON, U. Ericsson’s Proactive Supply Chain Risk Management Approach after a Serious Sub-supplier Accident. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., v. 34, n. 5, p. 434-456, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/09600030410545463.
OLIVEIRA, F.R.S.; LIMA NETO, F.B. Personalizing the explanation extraction in Intelligent Decision Support Systems. In: 16TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 16., 2021, p. 1-6, Chaves-Portugal. Anais eletrônicos [...]. Chaves: IEEE, 2021. DOI: 10.23919/CISTI52073.2021.9476588.
OLIVEIRA, J.B. et al. The role of simulation and optimization methods in supply chain risk management: Performance and review standpoints. Sim. Modell. Prac. and The., v. 92, p. 17-44, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2018.11.007.
OLIVEIRA, U.R.; ESPINDOLA, L.S.; MARINS, F.A.S. Analysis of supply chain risk management researches. Gest. Prod., v. 25, n. 4, 2018. DOI: 10.1590/0104-530x3515-16.
OLSON, D.L.; WU, D.D. A review of enterprise risk management in supply chain. Kybernetes, v. 39, n. 5, p. 694-706, 2010. DOI: 10.1108/03684921011043198.
PECK, H. Reconciling supply chain vulnerability, risk and supply chain management. Int. J. Logist. - Res. App., v. 9, p. 127-142, 2006. DOI: 10.1080/13675560600673578.
PEIDRO, D. et al. Quantitative models for supply chain planning under uncertainty: a review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech, v. 43, p. 400-420, 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1715-y.
PERSSON, O.; DANELL, R.; SCHNEIDER, J.W. How to use bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In: ÅSTRÖM, F. et al. (Ed.). Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday. International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, p. 9-24.
PFOHL, H.C.; KÖHLER, H.; THOMAS, D. State of the art in supply chain risk management research: empirical and conceptual findings and a roadmap for the implementation in practice. Logist. Res., v. 2, p. 33-44, 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s12159-010-0023-8
PORTER, M.E. Estratégia competitiva: técnicas para análise de indústrias e da concorrência. São Paulo: Gen Atlas, 2005, 448 p.
PRAKASH, S. et al. A critical analysis of supply chain risk management content: a structured literature review. J. Adv. Manage. Res., v. 14, n. 1, p. 69-90, 2017. DOI: 10.1108/JAMR-10-2015-0073.
PRAKASH, S. et al. Prioritisation and assessment of collaboration decisions for supply chain with risk considerations using TOPSIS. Int. J. of Adv. Oper. Manage., v. 8, n. 3, p. 168-184, 2016. DOI: 10.1504/IJAOM.2016.081302.
PRESSMAN, R.S. Engenharia de software: uma abordagem profissional. Porto Alegre: AMGH, 7. ed., 2011.
PRODANOV, C.C.; FREITAS, E.C. Metodologia do Trabalho Científico [recurso eletrônico]: métodos e técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico. Novo Hamburgo: Feevale, 2. ed., 2013.
PULLMAN, M.E.; MALONI, M.J.; CARTER, C. R. Food for thought: social versus environmental sustainability practices and performance outcomes. J. Supp. Chain Manage., v. 45, p. 38-54, 2009. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03175.x.
QUEIROZ, M.; TELLES, R.; BONILLA, S. Blockchain and supply chain management integration: a systematic review of the literature. Supply Chain Manage., v. 25, n. 2, p. 241-254, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-03-2018-0143.
QUINTELLA, C.O.V.; DELGADO, F.; LIMA, L.M. (Eds.) Doing Business with the Brazilian Onshore Environment, Cadernos FGV Energia, MME, ano 7, n. 10, jun. 2020, 100 p. Disponível em: <https://fgvenergia.fgv.br/publicacao/doing-business-brazilian-onshore-environment> Acesso: 12 out. 2020.
RADIVOJEVIĆ, G.; GAJOVIĆ, V. Supply chain risk modeling by AHP and Fuzzy AHP methods. J. of Risk Res., v. 17, n. 3, p. 337-352, 2014. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2013.808689.
RAJAGOPAL, V.; SHANMUGAM, P.; GOH, M. Decision-making models for supply chain risk mitigation: A review. Comput. Ind. Eng., v. 113, p. 646-682, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.09.043.
RAJESH, R. Social and environmental risk management in resilient supply chains: A periodical study by the Grey-Verhulst model. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 57, n. 11, p. 3748-3765, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1566656.
RAMANATHAN, R. Supplier selection problem: Integrating DEA with the approaches of total cost of ownership and AHP. Supply Chain Manage., v. 12, n. 4, p. 258-261, 2007. DOI: 10.1108/13598540710759772.
RANGEL, D.A.; OLIVEIRA, T.K.; LEITE, M.S.A. Supply chain risk classification: discussion and proposal. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 53, n. 22, p. 6868-6887, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2014.910620.
RAO, C. et al. Compound Mechanism Design of Supplier Selection Based on Multi-attribute Auction and Risk Management of Supply Chain. Comput. Ind. Eng., v. 105, p. 63-75, 2017. DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2016.12.042.
RAO, S.; GOLDSBY, T.J. Supply chain risks: a review and typology. Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 20, n. 1, p. 97-123, 2009. DOI: 10.1108/09574090910954864.
RAVINDRAN, A.R. et al. Risk Adjusted Multicriteria Supplier Selection Models with Applications. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 48, p. 405-424, 2010. DOI:10.1080/00207540903174940.
REINER, G. Supply chain management research methodology using quantitative models based on empirical data. In: KOTZAB, H. et al. (Ed.). Research methodologies in supply chain management. Heidelberg: Physica - Verlag, 2005.
REVILLA, E.; SAENZ, M. J. The impact of risk management on the frequency of supply chain disruptions: A configurational approach. Int. J. of Op. & Prod. Manage., v. 37, n. 5, p. 557-576, 2017. DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2016-0129.
REZAEI, J.; FAHIM, P.B.; TAVASSZY, L. Supplier selection in the airline retail industry using a funnel methodology: Conjunctive screening method and fuzzy AHP. Exp. Syst. with App., v. 41, n. 18, p. 8165-8179, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.005.
REZAEI, J.; ORTT, R. Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 225, p. 75-84, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.037.
ROEHRICH, J.K.; GROSVOLD, J.; HOEJMOSE, S.U. Reputational risks and sustainable supply chain management: Decision making under bounded rationality. Int. J. of Op. & Prod. Manage., v. 34, n. 5, p. 695-719, 2014. DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-10-2012-0449.
ROSTAMZADEH, R. et al. Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS-CRITIC approach. J. of Cleaner Prod., v. 175, p. 651-669, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.071.
ROWLEY, J.; SLACK, F. Conducting a literature review. Manage. Res. News, v. 27, p. 31-39, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/01409170410784185.
RUIZ-TORRES, A.J.; MAHMOODI, F.; ZENG, A.Z. Supplier Selection Model with Contingency Planning for Supplier Failures. Comput. Ind. Eng., v. 66, p. 374-382, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2013.06.021.
SAATY, T.L. Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int. J. of Serv. Sciences, v. 1, n. 1, p. 83-98, 2008.
SAATY, T.L. How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Eur. J. of Op. Res., v. 48, n. 1, p. 9-26, 1990. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.
SAATY, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: planning, priority, setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
SADIK, Z.A.; DATE, P.M.; MITRA, G. Forecasting crude oil futures prices using global macroeconomic news sentimento. IMA J. of Manage. Math., v. 31, n. 2, p. 191-215, 2020. DOI: 10.1093/imaman/dpz011.
SAHU, N.K.; SAHU, A.K.; SAHU, A.K. Appraisement and benchmarking of third-party logistic service provider by exploration of risk-based approach. Cogent Bus. & Manage., v. 2, n. 1, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2015.1121637.
SAINI, R.; SAINI, S. Improvement in the Energy Supply Chain Risk Management of Oil and Petroleum Industries - using the concept of ANN embedded in SCM. Int. J. of Appl. or Innov. in Enginee. & Manage., v. 3, n. 1, 2014. Disponível em: <https://www.ijaiem.org/volume3issue1/IJAIEM-2014-01-09-020.pdf> Acesso em: 10 jun. 2021.
SAKIB, N. et al. An assessment of probabilistic disaster in the oil and gas supply chain leveraging Bayesian belief network. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 235, p. 108107, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108107.
SAMVEDI, A.; JAIN, V.; CHAN, F.T.S. Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 51, p. 2433–2442, 2013. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.741330.
SANDERS, N.R.; GANESHAN, R. Special issue of production and operations management on “Big Data in supply chain management”. Prod. Oper. Manage., v. 24, n. 5, p. 519-520, 2015.
SANTOSO, T. et al. A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Research, v. 167, p. 96-115, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.046.
SAWIK, T. Joint Supplier Selection and Scheduling of Customer Orders under Disruption Risks: Single vs. Dual Sourcing. Omega, v. 43, p. 83-95, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2013.06.007.
SCHMITT, A.J.; SINGH, M. A quantitative analysis of disruption risk in a multi-echelon supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 139, n. 1, p. 22-32, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.004.
SCHOENHERR, T., TUMMALA, V.M.R.; HARRISON, T.P. Assessing Supply Chain Risks with the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Providing Decision Support for the Offshoring Decision by a US Manufacturing Company. J. of Purch. and Supply Manage., v. 14, n. 2, p. 100-111, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2008.01.008.
SEBASTIANELLI, R.; TAMIMI, N. Antecedents of sustainable supply chain initiatives: Empirical evidence from the S&P 500. Bus. Soc. Rev., v. 125, p. 3-22, 2020. DOI: 10.1111/basr.12191.
SEIFERT, R.W.; THONEMANN, U.W.; HAUSMAN, W.H. Optimal procurement strategies for online spot markets. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 152, n. 3, p. 781-799, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00754-3.
SEPTIANI, W. et al. Method and approach mapping for agri-food supply chain risk management: A literature review. Supply Chain Manag., v. 5, n. 2, 2016. Disponível em: <https://ojs.excelingtech.co.uk/index.php/IJSCM/article/view/1179> Acesso em: 10 fev. 2020.
SEURING, S. A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decis. Support Syst., v. 54, n. 4, p. 1513-1520, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.053.
SEURING, S. Case study research in supply chains - an outline and three examples. In: KOTZAB, H. et al. (Ed.). Research methodologies in supply chain management. Heidelberg: Physica - Verlag, 2005.
SEURING, S.; MÜLLER, M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. of Cleaner Prod., v. 16, n. 15, p. 1699-1710, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020.
SHAHBAZ, M.S.; RASI, R.Z.R.M.; AHMAD, M.D.F.B. A novel classification of supply chain risks: Scale development and validation. J. of Ind. Enginee. and Manage., vol. 12, n. 1, p. 201-218, 2019. DOI: doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2792.
SHAPIRO, J.F. Modeling the supply chain. Belmont: South-Western, 2. ed., 2006.
SHARMA, S.K.; BHAT, A. Supply chain risk management dimensions in Indian automobile industry: A cluster analysis approach. Benchmarking: An Int. J., v. 21, n. 6, p. 1023-1040, 2014. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-02-2013-0023.
SHARMA, S.; ROUTROY, S. Modeling information risk in supply chain using Bayesian networks. J. Enterp. Infor. Manage., v. 29, n. 2, p. 238-254, 2016. DOI: 10.1108/JEIM-03-2014-0031.
SHAVERDI, M. et al. Developing sustainable SCM evaluation model using fuzzy AHP in publishing industry. Procedia Comp. Sci., v. 17, p. 340-349, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.044.
SHAW, K. et al. Global supplier selection considering sustainability and carbon footprint issue: AHP multi-objective fuzzy linear programming approach. Int. J. of Op. Res., v. 17, n. 2, p. 215-247, 2013. DOI: 10.1504/IJOR.2013.053624.
SHEFFI, Y. Supply chain management under the threat of international terrorism. Int. J. Log. Manag., v. 12, n. 2, p. 1-11, 2001. DOI: 10.1108/09574090110806262.
SHEMA, H. “What’s wrong with citation analysis?” 2013. Disponível em: <http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/information-culture/2013/01/01/whats-wrong- with-citation-analysis/> Acesso em: 30 abr. 2020.
SHI, D. A review of enterprise supply chain risk management. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng., v. 13, p. 219-244, 2004. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-006-0162-2.
SIDOROVA, A. et al. Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Quarterly, v. 32, n. 3, p. 467-482, 2008. DOI: 10.2307/25148852.
SILVA, L.M.F. et al. Risk assessment model using conditional probability and simulation: case study in a piped gas supply chain in Brazil. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 59, n. 10, p. 2960-2976, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1744764.
SIMANGUNSONG, E.; HENDRY, L.C.; STEVENSON, M. Supply-chain uncertainty: a review and theoretical foundation for future research. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 50, n. 16, p. 4493-4523, 2012. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2011.613864.
SIMCHI-LEVI, D. The 6 forces driving supply chain design. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev., v. 51, n. 2, p. 17-24, 2010.
SIMIĆ, D. et al. 50 years of fuzzy set theory and models for supplier assessment and selection: A literature review. J. of App. Logic, v. 24, part A, p. 85-96, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jal.2016.11.016.
SIMON, H.A. Models of bounded rationality. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1982, 504 p.
SINGHAL, P.; AGARWAL, G.; MITTAL, M.L. Supply chain risk management: review, classification and future research directions. Int. J. Bus. Sci. App. Manage., v. 6, n. 3, p. 15-42, 2011.
SINHA, A.K. et al. Agent oriented petroleum supply chain coordination: Co-evolutionary Particle Swarm Optimization based approach. Exp. Syst. with App., v. 38, n. 5, p. 6132-6145, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.004.
SINHA, P.R.; WHITMAN, L.E.; MALZAHN, D. Methodology to mitigate supplier risk in an aerospace supply chain. Supply Chain Manage.: An Int. J., v. 9, n. 2, p. 154-168, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/13598540410527051.
SLACK, N.; BRANDON-JONES, A.; JOHNSTON, R. Operations Management. Harlow: Pearson, 8. ed., 2016.
SMALL, H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci., v. 24, n. 4, p. 265-269, 1973.
SMALL, H. Visualizing science by citation mapping. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tec., v. 50, n. 9, p. 799-813, 1999. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:93.3.CO;2-7.
SMELTZER, L.R.; SIFERD, S.P. Proactive Supply Management: The Management of Risk. Int. J. Purch. Mater. Manag., v. 34, p. 38-45, 1998. DOI:10.1111/j.1745-493X.1998.tb00040.x.
SNYDER, L.V. et al. OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review. IISE Trans., v. 48, n. 2, p. 89-109, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2015.1067735.
SNYDER, L.V.; DASKIN, M.S.; TEO, C.P. The stochastic location model with risk pooling. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 179, n. 3, p. 1221-1238, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.03.076.
SODHI, M.S.; SON, B.G.; TANG, C.S. Researchers' perspectives on supply chain risk management. Prod. Oper. Manage., v. 21, p. 1-13, 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01251.x.
SOFYALIOĞLU, Ç.; KARTAL, B. The Selection of Global Supply Chain Risk Management Strategies by Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process - A Case from Turkey. Procedia-Soc. and Beh. Sci., v. 58, 2012. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1131.
SOMMERVILLE, I. Engenharia de software. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall, 9. ed., 2011.
SON, C.E. Supply Chain Risk Management: A Review of Thirteen Years of Research. Amer. J. Ind. Bus. Manage., v. 8, 2294-2320, 2018. DOI: 10.4236/ajibm.2018.812154.
SONG, W.; MING, X.; LIU, H-C. Identifying critical risk factors of sustainable supply chain management: A rough strength-relation analysis method. J. of Cleaner Prod., v. 143, p. 100-115, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.145.
STECKE, K.E.; KUMAR, S. Sources of Supply Chain Disruptions, Factors That Breed Vulnerability, and Mitigating Strategies. J. Mark. Chann., v. 16, n. 3, p. 193-226, 2009. DOI: 10.1080/10466690902932551.
SYED, M.W. et al. An Empirical Examination of Sustainable Supply Chain Risk and Integration Practices: A Performance-Based Evidence from Pakistan. Sustainability, v. 11, p. 5334, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11195334.
TALLURI, S.; NARASIMHAN, R. Vendor Evaluation with Performance Variability: A Max-Min Approach. Eur. J. of Op. Res., v. 146, n. 3, p. 543–552, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00230-8.
TALLURI, S.; NARASIMHAN, R.; NAIR, A. Vendor performance with supply risk: a chance-constrained dea approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 100, n. 2, p. 212-222, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.012.
TAN, K.H.; WONG, W.P.; CHUNG, L. Information and knowledge leakage in supply chain. Inf. Syst. Frontiers, v. 18, n. 3, p. 621-638, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-015-9553-6
TANG, C.S. Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 103, n. 2, p. 451-488, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006.
TANG, C.S.; TOMLIN, B. The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 116, n. 1, p. 12-27, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.008.
TANG, O.; MUSA, S.N. Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 133, p. 25-34, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.013.
TAZELAAR, F.; SNIJDERS, C. Operational risk assessments by supply chain professionals: process and performance. J. of Op. Manage., v. 31, n. 1, p. 37-51, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2012.11.004.
TEUSCHER, P.; GRÜNINGER, B.; FERDINAND, N. Risk management in Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM): Lessons learnt from the case of GMO-free soybeans. Corp. Social Resp. and Env. Manage., v. 13, p. 1-10, 2006. DOI: 10.1002/csr.81.
THE ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS SCHOOLS. The Academic Journal Guide 2018. Disponível em: <https://charteredabs.org/academic-journal-guide-2018-view/> Acesso em: 15 abr. 2020.
TIAN, J.; YAN, Z.F. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process for Risk Assessment to General-assembling of Satellite. J. of App. Res. and Tech., v. 11, n. 4, p. 568-577, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/S1665-6423(13)71564-5.
TOMAS, R.N.; ALCANTARA, R.L.C. Models for risk management in supply chains: review, analysis, and guidelines for research. Gest. & Prod., v. 20, n. 3, p. 695-712, 2013. DOI: 10.1590/S0104-530X2013000300014.
TOMLIN, B. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Manage. Sci., v. 52, p. 639-657, 2006. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0515.
TRAN, T. H.; DOBROVNIK, M.; KUMMER, S. Supply chain risk assessment: a content analysis-based literature review. Int. J. of Log. Syst. Manage., v. 31, n. 4, p. 562-591, 2018. DOI: 10.1504/IJLSM.2018.096088.
TRANFIELD, D.; DENYER, D.; SMART, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Brit. J. Manage., v. 14, p. 207-222, 2003. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
TSAI, C.Y. On Supply Chain Cash Flow Risks. Dec. Supp. Syst., v. 44, n. 4, p. 1031-1042, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2007.12.006.
TSAUR, S.-H.; CHANG, T.-Y.; YEN, C.-H. The evaluation of airline service quality by Fuzzy MCDM. Tour. Manage, v. 23, n. 2, p. 107-115, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00050-4.
TSE, Y.K. et al. Quality risk in global supply network. J. of Manuf. Tech. Manage., v. 22, p. 1002-1013, 2011.
TUKAMUHABWA, B.R. et al. Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 53, n. 18, p. 5592-5623, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1037934.
TUMMALA, R.; SCHOENHERR, T. Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process [SCRMP]. Supply Chain Manage.: An Int. J., v. 16, n. 6, p. 474-483, 2011. DOI: 10.1108/13598541111171165.
TUNCEL, G.; ALPAN, G. Risk assessment and management for supply chain networks: A case study. Comput. Ind., v. 61, n. 3, p. 250-259, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2009.09.008.
VAIDYA, O.S.; KUMAR, S. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. Eur. J. of Op. Res., v. 169, n. 1, p. 1-29, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028.
VAN ECK, N.J.; WALTMAN, L. Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.6. Universiteit Leiden and Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, 2017.
VAN ECK, N.J.; WALTMAN, L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: DING, Y.; ROUSSEAU, R.; WOLFRAM, D. (Eds.). Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice , p. 285-320. Suíça: Springer, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13.
VAN LAARHOVEN, P.; PEDRYCZ, W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst., v. 11, p. 199-227, 1983. DOI:10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7.
VANANY, I.; ZAILANI, S.; PUJAWAN, N. Supply Chain Risk Management: Literature Review and Future Research. Int. J. Infor. Syst. Supply Chain Manage., v. 2, p. 16-33, 2009. DOI: 10.4018/jisscm.2009010102.
VENKATESH, V.G.; RATHI, S.; PATWA, S. Analysis on supply chain risks in Indian apparel retail chains and proposal of risk prioritization model using Interpretive structural modeling. J. Retailing Consum. Serv., v. 26, p. 153-167, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.06.001.
VISHWAKARMA V.; PRAKASH, C.; BARUA, M.K. A fuzzy-based multi criteria decision making approach for supply chain risk assessment in Indian pharmaceutical industry. Int. J. of Log. Syst. and Manage., v. 25, n. 2, p. 245, 2016. DOI: 10.1504/ijlsm.2016.078915.
VISHWAKARMA V.; PRAKASH, C.; BARUA, M.K. Modeling the barriers of Indian Pharmaceutical Supply Chain using fuzzy AHP. Int. J. of Oper. Res., v. 34, n. 2, p. 240-268, 2019. DOI: 10.1504/IJOR.2019.097578.
VISWANADHAM, N.; SAMVEDI, A. Supplier Selection Based on Supply Chain Ecosystem, Performance and Risk Criteria. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 51, p. 6484-6498, 2013. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2013.825056.
WAGNER, S.M.; NESHAT, N. Assessing the Vulnerability of Supply Chains Using Graph Theory. Int. J. of Prod. Econo., v. 126, n. 1, p. 121-129, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.007.
WAGNER, S.M.; BODE, C. An Empirical Examination of Supply Chain Performance Along Several Dimensions of Risk. J. Bus. Logist., v. 29, p. 307-325, 2008. DOI: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2008.tb00081.x.
WANG, C.X.; WEBSTER, S. Channel coordination for a supply chain with a risk‐neutral manufacturer and a loss‐averse retailer. Decision Sci., v. 38, p. 361-389, 2007. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00163.x.
WANG, J.; SHU, Y.F. Fuzzy decision modeling for supply chain management. Fuzzy Set. Syst., v. 150, p. 107-127, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2004.07.005.
WANG, X. et al. A two-stage fuzzy-AHP model for risk assessment of implementing green initiatives in the fashion supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 135, n. 2, p. 595-606, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.03.021.
WANG, X.; LI, D.; SHI, X. A fuzzy model for aggregative food safety risk assessment in food supply chains. Prod. Plan. & Control, v. 23, n. 5, p. 377-395, 2012. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2011.561812.
WANG, Y.-M.; LUO, Y.; HUA, Z. On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. Eur. J. of Oper. Res., v. 186, n. 2, p. 735-747, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.050.
WEC - WORLD ENERGY COUNCIL. World Energy Issues Monitor 2021: Humanising energy. London, 2021. 51 p. Disponível em: <https://www.worldenergy.org/assets/downloads/Issues_Monitor_2021-final.pdf> Acesso em: 20 maio 2021.
WEF - WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. 15th The Global Risks Report. 2020. Disponível em: <http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risk_Report_2020.pdf> Acesso em: 15 jul. 2020.
WEF - WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. 16th The Global Risks Report. 2021. Disponível em: <http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2021.pdf> Acesso em: 12 fev. 2021.
WILLIAMS, Z.; LUEG, J.E.; LEMAY, S.A. Supply chain security: an overview and research agenda. Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 19, n. 2, p. 254 281, 2008. DOI: 10.1108/09574090810895988.
WILSON, C. Brainstorming and Beyond: a user-centered design method. Oxford: Morgan Kaufmann, 2013.
WU, D.D. et al. Fuzzy multi-objective programming for supplier selection and risk modeling: A possibility approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 200, n. 3, p. 774-787, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.026.
WU, D.D.; OLSON, D. Enterprise Risk Management: A DEA VaR Approach in Vendor Selection. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 48, p. 4919-4932, 2010. DOI:10.1080/00207540903051684.
WU, K.-J. et al. Toward sustainability: using big data to explore the decisive attributes of supply chain risks and uncertainties. J. of Cleaner Prod., v. 142, part 2, p. 663-676, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.040.
WU, T.; BLACKHURST, J.; CHIDAMBARAM, V. A model for inbound supply risk analysis. Comput. Ind., v. 57, n. 4, p. 350-365, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2005.11.001.
WU, Z.; CHOI, T.Y.; RUNGTUSANATHAM, M.J. Supplier–supplier Relationships in Buyer–supplier–supplier Triads: Implications for Supplier Performance. J. Oper. Manag., v. 28, p. 115-123, 2010. DOI:10.1016/j.jom.2009.09.002.
XU, G. et al. Coordinating a dual-channel supply chain with risk-averse under a two-way revenue sharing contract. Int. J. Prod. Econ., v. 147 (PART A), p. 171-179, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.09.012.
XU, M. et al. Supply chain sustainability risk and assessment. J. of Cleaner Prod., v. 225, p. 857-867, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.307.
YADAV, V.; SHARMA, M.K. Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection using fuzzy AHP approach. Benchmarking: An Int. J., v. 2, n. 6, p. 1158-1174, 2015. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-04-2014-0036.
YAZDANI, M. et al. A risk-based integrated decision-making model for green supplier selection: A case study of a construction company in Spain. Kybernetes, v. 49, p. 1229-1252, 2019. DOI:10.1108/K-09-2018-0509.
YIN, R.K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 5. ed., 2014, 320 p.
YOON, J. et al. Models for supplier selection and risk mitigation: a holistic approach. Int. J. of Prod. Res., v. 56, n. 10, p. 3636-3661, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1403056.
YOU, F.; Grossmann, I.E. Design of responsive supply chains under demand uncertainty. Comput. Chem. Eng., v. 32, n. 12, p. 3090-3111, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.05.004.
YU, M.C., GOH, M.; LIN, H.C. Fuzzy multi-objective vendor selection under lean procurement. Eur. J. Oper. Res., v. 219, p. 305-311, 2012. DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.12.028.
ZADEH, L. A. Fuzzy sets. Inform. and Control, v. 8, n. 3, p. 338-353, 1965. DOI: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
ZANJIRCHI, S.M.; JALILIAN, N.; MIRHOSEINI, A. Risk-agility interactive model: a new look at agility drivers. J. of Model. in Manage., v. 12, n. 4, p. 690-711, 2017. DOI: 10.1108/JM2-01-2016-0007
ZAPA, E.; COGOLLO, J. Fuzzy-BSC Methodology for Decision Making in Indemnity Area of Insurance Companies. IEEE Latam Trans., v. 16, p. 2539-2546, 2018. DOI:10.1109/TLA.2018.8795133.
ZHONG, R.Y. et al. Intelligent Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Review. Engineering, v. 3, n. 5, p. 616-630, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015.
ZHU, Q.; KRIKKE, H.; CANIËLS, M.C.J. Integrated supply chain risk management: a systematic review. Int. J. Log. Manage., v. 28, n. 4, p. 1123-1141, 2017. DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-09-2016-0206.
ZIMMER, K. et al. Assessing social risks of global supply chains: A quantitative analytical approach and its application to supplier selection in the German automotive industry. J. Clean. Prod., v. 149, p. 96-109, 2017. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.041.
ZIMMER, K.; FRÖHLING, M.; SCHULTMANN, F. Sustainable supplier management - A review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. Int. J. Prod. Res., v. 54, p. 1412-1442, 2016. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340.
ZSIDISIN, G.A. A Grounded Definition of Supply Risk. J. Purch. Supply Manag., v. 9, p. 217–224, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2003.07.002.
ZSIDISIN, G.A.; ELLRAM, L.M. An Agency Theory Investigation of Supply Risk Management. The J. of Supply Chain Manage., v. 39, n. 2, p. 15-27, 2003. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2003.tb00156.x.
ZSIDISIN, G.A.; ELLRAM, L.M. Supply risk assessment analysis. Practix, Best Pract. in Purch. and Supp. Chain Manage., p. 9-12, 1999.
ZSIDISIN, G.A. et al. An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log., v. 34, n. 5, p. 397-413, 2004. DOI: 10.1108/09600030410545445.
ZSIDISIN, G.A.; RITCHIE, B. Supply Chain Risk. Suíça: Springer, 2010, 350 p.
ZUPIC, I.; CATER, T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ. Res. Methods, v. 18, n. 3, p. 429-472, 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1094428114562629. | pt_BR |