Rocha, Pedro Mesquita da; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6699-0041; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0096344760378113
Resumen:
The permanent campaign has become a central phenomenon in contemporary politics,
characterized by the continuous use of electoral strategies throughout the mandate by elected
political agents across different levels of governance. These strategies aim to influence the
construction of public image and ensure the maintenance of a positive reputation. Moreover,
the permanent campaign model enables politicians to gain greater visibility and remain in the
spotlight. This study seeks to understand this phenomenon by analyzing the digital
communication of five presidents: Jair Bolsonaro (Brazil), Nicolás Maduro (Venezuela),
Donald Trump (United States), Alberto Fernández (Argentina), and Sebastián Piñera (Chile),
all of whom maintain significant social media presence on platforms like Instagram and
Twitter. These platforms, widely used by users worldwide, offer unique characteristics that
provide a comprehensive view of political communication. The high frequency of posts,
combined with personalization and professionalism in content creation, reveals these leaders'
ongoing concern with remaining relevant, as if they were still on the electoral stage. To
examine the positions adopted by these politicians, content analysis techniques were applied,
with each post considered a unit of analysis, in a total of 2,849 posts. The following
categories were defined to characterize the communication model of each political agent: (1)
Political Positioning and on Highlighted Issues, (2) Attacks and Negative Campaigning, (3)
Display of Achievements, (4) Search for and Demonstration of Political Capital, (5)
Evocation of National Symbols, (6) Differentiations, (7) Private Life, and (8) Others. The
specific contexts in which each president operated were also considered, as key events—such
as the Parliamentary Inquiry Commission (CPI) in Bolsonaro’s case or the humanitarian crisis
faced by Maduro—directly influenced the content of their posts. Additionally, this study
explores the consequences of maintaining an active campaign after the electoral victory.
While governing demands conciliation, the logic of electoral campaigns relies on selfpromotion
and persuasion, which may foster polarization and weaken public debate and
democracy, especially when negative campaigning and attacks are escalated. The results
indicate that each president developed distinct permanent campaigns, focusing on specific
categories and adapting their rhetoric to the current political moment. Donald Trump, for
instance, maintained a combative posture, directing attacks toward various social and political
actors, particularly during his impeachment process, during which many of his posts sought to
delegitimize legal and parliamentary proceedings. Among the limitations of this work are the
three-month temporal scope, exclusively within the digital sphere, and the fact that it does not
also cover the election. In conclusion, this research sheds light on the phenomenon of the
permanent campaign, an underexplored topic but one of growing importance in the current
political dynamics, as more representatives adopt these strategies to remain in the spotlight
and shape their public image.