Motter, Julianna Paz Japiassu; https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6735-2120; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5464481602632629
Resumo:
This research maps the various ways in which digital platforms have operated in the
(re)production of lesbian identities and “sapatonices” (a Brazilian Portuguese term referring to
lesbian expressions and subjectivities), through documentation that accounts for how different
platforms (re)produce lesbophobia while simultaneously helping to provide new notions,
reinscriptions, and rearticulations of lesbian existence. To this end, the study also evaluates
how processes of data coloniality and technological coloniality contribute to the
intensification of semiotic-material discrimination against lesbians. The research addresses
the impact of these processes on lesbians through the outputs of platforms originating in
Silicon Valley and operating in Latin American countries, with an emphasis on Brazil,
focusing specifically on Instagram, ChatGPT, and Google Search. These platforms were
selected based on incidents and controversies reported by users, who denounced them as
exhibiting lesbophobic expressions embedded in their structures. Through a theoretical
framework grounded in decolonial perspectives (Anzaldúa, 2021; Lugones, 2014; Ricaurte,
2019; Quijano, 2000; Mignolo, 2014) and discussions on algorithmic bias (Buolamwini &
Raji, 2019; Bucher, 2018; Noble, 2018; Silva, 2019, 2020a, 2020b, 2022), this study analyzes
the entanglement between algorithmic bias and the coloniality of bodies, data, and platforms
from the perspective of lesbian identities and “sapatonices”. Thus, the research also seeks to
understand how algorithms and other agencies involved in digital platforms contribute to the
dispositifs of sexuality and gender (Foucault, 2013).