Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/5358
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPinna, Melissa Hanzen-
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Gabriel-
dc.contributor.authorPinheiro, Ana carla-
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Daniela-
dc.contributor.authorOriá, Arianne-
dc.contributor.authorLilenbaum, Walter-
dc.creatorPinna, Melissa Hanzen-
dc.creatorMartins, Gabriel-
dc.creatorPinheiro, Ana carla-
dc.creatorAlmeida, Daniela-
dc.creatorOriá, Arianne-
dc.creatorLilenbaum, Walter-
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-08T22:47:26Z-
dc.date.available2012-02-08T22:47:26Z-
dc.date.issued2012-02-08-
dc.identifier.issn0275-2565-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/5358-
dc.description.abstractLeptospirosis is a widely distributed zoonosis that affects several species of domestic and wild animals. Under captive conditions, Leptospirosis is a potential problem because the physical conditions in most zoos and research centers cannot prevent the captive animals from being exposed to rodents, raccoons, opossums, and other local wildlife that are known carriers. Yet, despite the potential risk, animals that are destined for reintroduction into the wild are not routinely tested for anti-Leptospira antibodies before their release. The purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence of anti-Leptospira antibodies in captive New World monkeys that were housed in the Wild Animals Screening Center in Salvador, Brazil. Blood samples were collected from 44 monkeys (28 Callithrix jacchus, eight Callithrix pennicilata, and eight Cebus sp.). The animals were screened for antibodies with the microscopic agglutination test. Twenty-five (56.8%) primates were seroreactive, with Icterohaemorrhagiae being the most frequent serogroup. None of the monkeys, however, presented clinical signs of leptospirosis. Thus, seroreactivity with low titers in asymptomatic animals, as observed in this study, suggests exposure to the agent. The unexpected predominance of the serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae further suggests that exposure to this serogroup occurred in captivity. Therefore, the dangerous possibility cannot be ignored that reintroduced monkeys will carry the leptospiral serovars into wild populations. In conclusion, primates exposed to urban serovars before their release from captivity represent a potentially significant health risk to wild populations.pt_BR
dc.language.isoen_USpt_BR
dc.sourcehttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajp.21005pt_BR
dc.subjectleptospirosispt_BR
dc.subjectdiagnosispt_BR
dc.subjectnonhuman primatespt_BR
dc.titleDetection of anti-Leptospira antibodies in captive nonhuman primates from Salvador, Brazil.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.description.localpubAmerican Journal of Primatology (Print)pt_BR
dc.identifier.numberv. 74, n.1pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo Publicado em Periódico (EMV)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
21005_ftp.pdf62,14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.