Skip navigation
Universidade Federal da Bahia |
Repositório Institucional da UFBA
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/39912
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorSilva, Rafael Pereira da-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-16T18:41:39Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-01-
dc.date.available2024-08-16T18:41:39Z-
dc.date.issued2023-12-20-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/39912-
dc.description.abstractHelicopsychidae is one of the most easily recognizable families, mainly due to the unique helical shape of the larval case, which resembles the shells of gastropod mollusks. Currently, 304 species are described in two genera, Rakiura McFarlane, monotypic and endemic to New Zealand, and Helicopsyche von Siebold. Helicopsyche has 303 species and a distribution in all biogeographic regions except Antarctica, with the greatest diversity found in the tropics. Taxonomic studies on the Helicopsychidae date back to the 19th century due to a misinterpretation of larval case. Only in 1856 the genus Helicopsyche was described based on the larval case of three species. Subsequently, Hagen transferred another four species to Helicopsyche. Misinterpretations were only resolved with the publication of Genera Insectorum by Ulmer, recognizing the genus as belong to the order Trichoptera. The phylogenetic relationships of the group were inferred by Schmid and, later, by Johanson with a large sample size. In a recent phylogenetic and biogeographic study on Sericostomatoidea, the previous hypotheses were refuted, and the relationship was proposed for the Neotropical subgenera Feropsyche Johanson and Cochliopsyche Müller. Feropsyche, the richest subgenus in species (127 species), was revised in 2002 and since then ca. 50 species have been described. However, distribution patterns, knowledge of semaphoronts and biological aspects remain poorly explored. On the other hand, Cochliopsyche, endemic to Neotropics and with only 17 species, was revised in 2003 and since then only distribution records and the description of one species have been made for the group. In this context, both groups, especially Cochliopsyche, have shortfalls in biodiversity knowledge related to species (Linnean shortfall), distribution patterns (Wallacean shortfall), knowledge of semaphoronts (Haeckelian shortfall) and knowledge of the evolution of the groups (Darwinian shortfall). In this context, this thesis aims to expand the knowledge of Helicopsychidae in the Neotropical region by describing new species and distributional patterns. In addition, a systematic revision of Cochliopsyche was performed, as well as the phylogenetic and biogeographic studies on the family. The results include the description of four new species of H. (Feropsyche) and the establishment of biogeographic patterns, potential distribution maps and the construction of a database with information on the group. The representatives of Dominican amber are removed from this subgenus based on phylogenetic results. Hypothesis are presented that the subgenus Feropsyche forms a lineage with the Australasian subgenus Saetotrichia. Cochliopsyche is resurrected to genus status based on phylogenetic and biogeographic results, and H. (Petrotrichia) as its sister group, with high support. In addition, a systematic revision of Cochliopsyche is provided, including standardized descriptions for all described species and description of five new species. In addition to Neotropical taxa, a phylogenetic proposal is presented for living and fossil species of Helicopsychidae, as well as a reconstruction of the ancestral area for the group. The legacy of this work is to be facing the shortfalls in Linnean, Wallacean and Darwinian knowledge of Neotropical taxa. The phylogenetic hypothesis presented suggests that the remaining subgenera of Helicopsyche form independent lineages, but due to the low support and taxon sampling, we are conservative and only indicate the need for more comprehensive work to test this hypothesis, preferring not to make taxonomic changes beyond the scope of this work.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPESpt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal da Bahiapt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito/Embargadopt_BR
dc.subjectCochliopsychept_BR
dc.subjectFeropsychept_BR
dc.subjectInferências filogenéticaspt_BR
dc.subjectHelicopsychept_BR
dc.subjectModelagem de distribuiçãopt_BR
dc.subjectNovas espéciespt_BR
dc.subjectEntomologiapt_BR
dc.subjectInsetos aquáticos - Classificaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectInsetos aquáticos - Distribuição demográficapt_BR
dc.subjectMosca-d´águapt_BR
dc.subjectBiodiversidadept_BR
dc.subject.otherCochliopsychept_BR
dc.subject.otherFeropsychept_BR
dc.subject.otherPhylogenetic inferencespt_BR
dc.subject.otherHelicopsychept_BR
dc.subject.otherHelicopsychept_BR
dc.subject.otherNew speciespt_BR
dc.titleSistemática e biogeografia de Helicopsychidae do Novo Mundo (Trichoptera): desafios no enfretamento dos déficits de conhecimento da biodiversidadept_BR
dc.title.alternativeSystematics and Biogeography of New World Helicopsychidae (Trichoptera): Challenges in Facing Biodiversity Knowledge Shortfallspt_BR
dc.typeTesept_BR
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Evolução (antigo Programa de Pós Graduação em Diversidade Animal-PPGDA) pt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFBApt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqTaxonomia dos Grupos Recentespt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqConservação das Espécies Animaispt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Calor, Adolfo Ricardo-
dc.contributor.advisor1IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3975-3176pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3092758417657523pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Calor, Adolfo Ricardo-
dc.contributor.referee1IDhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3092758417657523pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3092758417657523pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Santos, Allan Paulo Moreira dos-
dc.contributor.referee3Oliveira, Ana Lucia Henriques-
dc.contributor.referee4Sganga, Julieta V.-
dc.contributor.referee5Desidério, Gleison Robson-
dc.creator.IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7578-6042pt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4809009611713171pt_BR
dc.description.resumoHelicopsychidae é uma das famílias mais facilmente reconhecíveis, principalmente pelo singular formato helicoidal dos abrigos larvais, que se assemelham às conchas de moluscos gastrópodes. Atualmente, 304 espécies estão descritas em dois gêneros, Rakiura McFarlane, monotípico e endêmico da Nova Zelândia, e Helicopsyche von Siebold. Helicopsyche apresenta 303 espécies e distribuição em todas as regiões biogeográficas, exceto Antártica. A maior diversidade deste gênero é encontrada nos trópicos. Os estudos taxonômicos sobre os Helicopsychidae iniciaram-se no século XIX a partir de uma má interpretação dos abrigos larvais. Somente em 1856 o gênero Helicopsyche foi descrito com base em abrigos larvais de três espécies. Posteriormente, Hagen transferiu outras quatro espécies para Helicopsyche. Os erros de interpretação só foram resolvidos com a publicação de Genera Insectorum por Ulmer, com o reconhecimento do gênero como pertencente à ordem Trichoptera. As relações filogenéticas do grupo foram inferidas primeiramente por Schmid e, posteriormente, por Johanson. Em um trabalho recente de inferências filogenéticas e biogeográficas para Sericostomatoidea, as hipóteses precedentes foram refutadas e foi recuperada uma relação entre os subgêneros Neotropicais Feropsyche Johanson e Cochliopsyche Müller. Feropsyche, o subgênero mais rico em espécies (127 espécies), foi revisado em 2002 e desde então ca. 50 espécies foram descritas. Porém, padrões de distribuição, conhecimento de semaforontes e de aspectos biológicos ainda permanecem pouco explorados. Na contramão, Cochliopsyche, endêmico da região Neotropical e com apenas 17 espécies, foi revisado em 2003 e desde então apenas registros de distribuição e descrição de uma única espécie foram feitos. Neste contexto, ambos os grupos, Cochliopsyche em especial, apresentam déficits de conhecimento da biodiversidade relacionados ao conhecimento das espécies (Déficit Linneano), padrões de distribuição (Déficit Wallaceano), de conhecimento dos semaforontes (Déficit Haeckeliano) e de conhecimento da evolução dos grupos (Déficit Darwiniano). Assim, a presente tese objetiva fornecer uma ampliação do conhecimento de Helicopsychidae na região Neotropical com descrição de novas espécies e dos padrões distribucionais. Para tanto, uma revisão sistemática de Cochliopsyche foi feita, assim como estudos filogenéticos e biogeográficos para a família. Como resultados temos a descrição de quatro novas espécies de H. (Feropsyche) e estabelecimento dos padrões biogeográficos, mapas de distribuição potencial e construção de base de dados com informações sobre este subgênero. Os representantes do âmbar Dominicano são retirados deste grupo com base em inferências filogenéticas. Também são aventadas hipóteses que o subgênero forme uma linhagem junto ao subgênero australasiano Saetotrichia. Cochliopsyche é reerigido ao status de gênero com base em inferências filogenéticas e biogeográficas, como grupo irmão dos H. (Petrotrichia) com alto suporte. Adicionalmente é fornecida uma revisão sistemática de Cochliopsyche, com fornecimento de descrição padronizada para todas as espécies e descrição de cinco espécies novas. Para além dos grupos Neotropicais, uma proposta filogenética entre os grupos viventes e fósseis de Helicopsychidae, assim como a reconstrução de área ancestral para o grupo. Como legado do trabalho temos o combate aos déficits de conhecimento Linneano, Wallaceano e Darwiniano para os grupos Neotropicais. A hipótese filogenética apresentada sugere que os subgêneros restantes de Helicopsyche constituam linhagens independentes, porém devido ao baixo suporte e amostragem taxonômica, seremos conservativos, apenas indicamos a necessidade de trabalhos mais abrangentes que testem essa hipótese, preferindo, assim, não realizar mudanças taxonômicas para além do escopo deste trabalho.pt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentInstituto de Biologiapt_BR
dc.relation.referencesAbell, R. et al. Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. BioScience, v. 58, p. 403–414. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580507 Akamagwuna, F.C., Odume, O.N. Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT) Functional Feeding Group Responses to Fine Grain Sediment Stress in a River in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, v. 192, p. 214–225. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8187-4 Ashton, N.N.; Taggart, D.S.; Stewart, R.J. Silk tape nanostructure and silk gland anatomy of trichoptera. Biopolymers, v. 97, p. 432–445. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.21720 Bowler, D.E. et al. Temporal trends in the spatial bias of species occurrence records. Ecography, v. 2022, p. e06219. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.06219 Bowles, D.E.; Courtney, G.W. Advances in aquatic insect systematics and biodiversity in the Neotropics: introduction. Aquatic Insects, v. 39, p. 89–93. Boyes, D.H.; Evans, D.M.; Fox, R.; Parsons, M.S.; Pocock, M.J.O. Is light pollution driving moth population declines? A review of causal mechanisms across the life cycle. Insects Conservation and Diversity, v. 14, p. 167–187. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12447 Calor, A.R.; Amorim, D.S.; Holzenthal, R.W. Phylogenetics Analysis of Notalina (Neonotalina), with descriptions of two new species. Zootaxa, v. 1131, p. 33-48. 2006. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1131.1.2 Cardoso, P. et al. Scientists' warning to humanity on insect extinctions. Biological Conservation, v. 242, p. e108426. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108426 Cavalcante-Silva, A.; Pereira, R. & Calor, A.R. Caddisflies (Trichoptera) checklist and a new species of Helicopsyche von Siebold, 1856, from the Brejo de Altitude de Triunfo, a relict rainforest within the Caatinga domain, Northeast Brazil. Zookeys, v. 1111, p. 215–244. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1111.77541 Cayuela, L. et al. The Tree Biodiversity Network (BIOTREE-NET): prospects for biodiversity research and conservation in the Neotropics. Biodiversity & Ecology, v. 4, p. 211–224. 2012. 285 Contrador, T.A.; Kennedy, J.H.; Rozzi, R. The conservation status of southern South American aquatic insects in the literature. Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 21, p. 2095–2107. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0299-x Cox, C.B.; Moore, P.D. Biogeography: An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach. John Wiley & Sons. 506 p. 2010. Cronquist, A. 1978. The Zingiberidae, a new subclass of Liliopsida (Monocotyledons). Brittonia, v. 30, p. 505–510. Culhane, F. et al. Risk to the supply of ecosystem services across aquatic ecosystems. Science of The Total Environment. v. 660, p. 611–621. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.346 Dangles, O.; Casas, J. Ecosystem services provided by insects for achieving sustainable development goals. Ecosystem Services, v. 35, p. 109–115. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.12.002 de Moor, F.C.; Ivanov, V.D. Global diversity of caddisflies (Trichoptera: Insecta) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia, v. 595, p. 393–407. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9113-2 Dijkstra, K.B., Monaghan, M.T.; Pauls, S.U. 2014. Freshwater biodiversity and aquatic insect diversification. Annual Review of Entomology, v. 59, 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-161958 Dumas, L.L.; Nessimian, J.L. New species of Helicopsyche von Siebold 1856 (Trichoptera: Helicopsychidae) from Brazil, including the redescription of Helicopsyche (Feropsyche) planorboides Machado 1957. Zootaxa, v. 4619, p. 231–250. 2019. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4619.2.2 Eisenhauer, N.; Boon, A.; Guerra, C.A. Recognizing the quiet extinction of invertebrates. Nature Communications, v. 50, p. 1–3. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07916-1 Faria, L.R.R.; Pie, M.R.; Salles, F;F.; Soares, E.D.G. The Haeckelian shortfall or the tale of the missing semaphoronts. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, v. 59, p. 359–369. . 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12435 Flint, O.S. Jr. Studies of Neotropical caddisflies, XIV: on a collection from northern Argentina. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, v. 85, p. 223–248. 1972. Flint, O.S. Jr. The Trichoptera of Surinam. Studies of Neotropical caddisflies, XV. Studies on the Fauna of Suriname and other Guyanas, v. 14, p. 1–151. 1974. 286 Flint, O.S. Jr. Studies of Neotropical Caddisflies, XXXIII: New Species from Austral South America (Trichoptera). Smithsonian Contributions of Zoology, v.377, p. 1–98. 1983. Flint, O.S. Jr. Studies of Neotropical caddisflies, XXXVI. The genus Cochliopsyche in Middle America (Trichoptera: Helicopsychidae). Anales del Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Series de Zoologica, v. 56, p. 213–216. 1986. Galetti, M. et al. Causes and consequences of large-scale defaunation in the Atlantic Forest. In. Marques, M.C.M; Grelle, C.E.V. (eds.) The Atlantic Forest History, Biodiversity, Threats and Opportunities of the Mega-diverse Forest. Switzerland, Springer, Cham. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55322-7_14 Gama-Neto, J.L.; Ribeiro, J.M.F.; Passos, M.A.B. Two new species of Helicopsyche Siebold 1856 (Insecta: Trichoptera: Helicopsychidae) from Pará State, northern Brazil. Zootaxa, v. 4565, p. 420–426. 2019. http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4565.3.8 Hamilton, S.W. Historical biogeography of two groups of Caribbean Polycentropus (Trichoptera: Polycentropodidae). In: Liebherr, J.K., (ed.) Zoogeography of Caribbean Insects. Cornell University Press, Ithaca; 1982. p. 153–182. Holzenthal, R.W. Studies in Neotropical Leptoceridae (Trichoptera), IV: a revision of Brachysetodes Schmid. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, v. 111, p. 407–440. 1986a. Holzenthal, R.W. The Neotropical species of Notalina, a southern group of long-horned caddisflies (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae). Systematic Entomology, v. 11, p. 61–73. 1986b. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.1986.tb00165.x Holzenthal, R.W.; Blahnik R.J. Systematics of the Neotropical caddisfly genus Notidobiella Schmid (Trichoptera, Sericostomatidae), with the description of 3 new species. ZooKeys, v. 71, p. 23–47. 2010. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.71.791 Holzenthal, R.W.; Calor, A.R. Catalog of the Neotropical Trichoptera (Caddisflies). ZooKeys, v. 654, p. 1–566. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.654.9516 Holzenthal, R.W.; Thomson, R.E.; Ríos-Touma, B. Order Trichoptera. In: Thorp, J.H., Rogers, D.C. (eds) Ecology and General Biology, Vol I, Thorp and Covich’s 287 Freshwater Invertebrates, 4th Edition. Academic Press, 2015. p. 965–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12385026-3.00038-3 Holzer, F.J. Zerstorung an Wasserleichen Durch Larven des Kocherfliege (Destruction of Corpses Submerged in Water by Trichoptera (caddis-fly) Larvae). Zeitschrift for die Gesamte Gerichliche Medizin, v. 31, n. 223-228. 1936. Hortal, J.; Bello, F.; Diniz-Filho, J.A.F.; Lewinsohn, T.M.; Lobo, J.M.; Ladle R.J. Seven Shortfalls that Beset Large-Scale Knowledge of Biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, v. 46, p. 523–549. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054400 Ivanov, V.D.; Sukatsheva, I.D. Trichoptera (Phryganeida). In Rasnitsyn, A.P.; Quicke, L.J. (eds), History of Insects. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht, Boston, London, 2002. p. 199–220. Johanson, K.A. A catalog of the Helicopsychidae (Insecta: Trichoptera) of the world. Bulletin Zoölogisch Museum, Universiteit van Amsterdam, v. 14, p. 101–123. 1995. Johanson, K.A. Zoogeography and diversity of the snail case caddisflies (Trichoptera: Helicopsychidae). In: Holzenthal, R.W. & Flint, O.S. Jr. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Trichoptera. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, Ohio, 1997. pp. 205–212. Johanson, K.A. Phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis of the family Helicopsychidae (Insecta: Trichoptera). Entomologica Scandinavica Supplement. v. 53, p. 1–172. 1998. Johanson, K.A. Systematic revision of American Helicopsyche of subgenus Feropsyche (Trichoptera: Helicopsychidae). Insects Systematics & Evolution, v. 60, p. 1–151. 2002. Johanson, K.A. Revision of the Neotropical caddisfly subgenus Helicopsyche (Cochliopsyche) (Trichoptera, Helicopsychidae), with descriptions of twelve new species. Insect Systematics & Evolution, v. 34, p. 381–414. 2003. Johanson, K.A.; Malm, T.; Espeland, M. Molecular phylogeny of Sericostomatoidea (Trichoptera) with the establishment of three new families. Systematic Entomology, v. 42, p. 240–266. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12209 Malm, T.; Johanson, K.A.; Wahlberg, N. The evolutionary history of Trichoptera (Insecta): A case of successful adaptation to life in freshwater. Systematic Entomology, v. 38, p. 459–473. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12016 288 Martynov, A.V. Rucheiniki [caddisflies] (Trichoptera). In: Bogdanova-Kat’kova, N.N. (Ed.), Prakticheskaya Entomologiya [Practical Entomology], Leningrad, 5, 1924, p. 1–388. McFarlane, A.G. Five new species of Trichoptera from New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 3, p. 23–34. 1973. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.1973.10416100 McIntyre, S.R.N.; Lineweaver, C.H.; Groves, C.P.; Chopra, A.Global biogeography since Pangaea. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, v. 284, p. e20170716. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0716 Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). Ecosystems and human well-being, United States of America: Island press. v. 5, p. 563–565. 2005. Mey, W.; Wichard, W.; Müller, P.; Ross, E.; Ross, A. New taxa of Tarachoptera from Burmese amber (Insecta, Amphiesmenoptera). Cretaceous Research, v. 90, p. 154–162. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2018.04.006 Misof, B. et al. Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science, v. 346.6210, p. 763-767. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257570 Monson, M.P.; Holzenthal, R.W.; Ahlstrand, G.G. The Larva and Pupa of Cochliopsyche vazquezae (Trichoptera: Helicopsychidae). Journal of the North American Benthological Society, v. 7, p. 152–159. 1988. Mora, C.; Tittensor, D.P.; Adl, S.; Simpson, A.G.B.; Worm, B. How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean? PlosBiology, v. 9, p. e1001127. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127 Morrone, J.J. Evolutionary Biogeography: An Integrative Approach with Case Studies. Columbia University Press. 632 p. 2008. Morrone, J.J. Biogeographical regionalization of the Neotropical region. Zootaxa, v. 3782, p. 1–110. 2014. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3782.1.1 Morse, J.C. Phylogeny of Trichoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 42:427–450. 1997. Morse, J.C. (ed.) 2023. Trichoptera World Checklist. https://trichopt.app.clemson.edu/welcome.php. Accesso em: 30 novembro 2023. Morse, J.C.; Frandsen, P.B.; Graf, W.; Thomas, J.A. Diversity and Ecosystem Services of Trichoptera. Insects, v. 10, p. 100–125. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10050125 289 Müller F. 1885. Wie Entsteht die Gleiderung der Insektenfuhler? Kosmos 17:201–204. Nelder J.A. & Wedderburn R.W.M.. 1932. Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 135:330–384. Olson, D.M. et al. Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth: A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. Bioscience, v. 51, p. 933–938. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2 Poff, N.L.; Olden, J.D.; Strayer, D.L. Climate Change and Freshwater Fauna Extinction Risk. In: Hannah, L. (eds) Saving a Million Species. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics. Spring Nature, p. 309–336. 2012. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-182-5_17 Robertson, D.R.; Holzenthal, R.W. The Neotropical caddisfly genus Tolhuaca (Trichoptera: Glossosomatidae). Zootaxa, v. 1063, p. 53–68. 2005. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1063.1.3 Ross, H.H. The evolution and past dispersal of the Trichoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, v. 12, p. 169–206. 1967. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.12.010167.001125 Ross, H.H.; King, E.W. Biogeographic and taxonomic studies in Atopsyche (Trichoptera, Rhyacophilidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, v. 45, p.177–204. 1952. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/45.2.177 Sánchez-Bayo, F.; Wyckhuys, K.A. Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers. Biology Conservation, v. 232, p. 8–23. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020 Santos, A.P.M.; Dumas, L.L.; Henriques-Oliveira, A.L.; Souza, W.R.M.; Camargos, L.M.; Calor, A.R.; Pes, A.M.O. Trichoptera in Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil. PNUD. http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/fauna/faunadobrasil/278. Acesso em: 30 de novembro de 2023 Souza, R.L.; Gomes, V.; Calor, A.R. A new species of snail-case caddisflies (Trichoptera: Helicopsychidae) and new records of caddisflies from Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil. Zootaxa, 4223, p. 343–358. 2017. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4223.3.3 290 Stork, N.E. How Many Species of Insects and Other Terrestrial Arthropods Are There on Earth? Annual Review of Entomology, p. 63, p. 31–45. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043348 Thomas, J.A.; Frandsen, P.B.; Prendini, E.; Zhou, X.; Holzenthal R.W. A multigene phylogeny and timeline for Trichoptera (Insecta). Systematic Entomology, v. 45, p. 670–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12422 Tickner, D. et al. Bending the Curve of Global Freshwater Biodiversity Loss: An Emergency Recovery Plan. BioScience, v. 30, p. 330–342. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa002 Troudet, J.; Grandcolas, P.; Blin, A.; Vignes-Lebbe, R.; Legendre, F. Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences. Science Report, v. 7, p. 1–14. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09084-6 Tundisi, J.G.; Masumura-Tundisi, T. Biodiversity in the neotropics: ecological, economic and social values. Brazilian Journal of Biology, v. 68, p. 913–915. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842008000500002 Ulmer, G. Zur Kenntniss aussereuropäischer Trichopteren. (Neue Trichoptern des Hamburger und Stettiner Museums und des Zoologischen Instituts in Halle, nebst Beschreibungen einiger Typen Kolenati’s und Burmeister’s.). Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung, v. 66, p. 1–119. 1905. Vilarino, A.; Calor, A.R. Trichoptera of Serra da Jibóia, Bahia, Brazil: new species of Helicopsyche (Helicopsychidae) and new records. Zootaxa, v. 4311, p. 507–522. 2017. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4311.4.4 Vogel, G. Where have all the insects gone? Science, v. 356, 576–579. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.356.6338.576 Eisenhauer, N.; Boon, A.; Guerra, C.A. Recognizing the quiet extinction of invertebrates. Nature Communications, v. 50, p. 1–3. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07916-1 von Siebold, C.T.E. Wahre Parthenogenesis bei Schmetterlingen und Bienen. Ein Beitrag zur Fortpflanzung Geschichte der Thiere, Vero Verlag, German, 1856. 156p. Wagner, D.L. Insect Declines in the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Entomology, v. 65, p. 457–480. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025151 291 Wagner, D. L.; Fox, R.; Salcido, D. M.; Dyer, L. A. A window to the world of global insect declines: Moth biodiversity trends are complex and heterogeneous. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 118, p. e2002549117. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002549117 Wahlberg, E.; Johanson, K.A. The age, ancestral distribution and radiation of Chimarra (Trichoptera: Philopotamidae) using molecular methods. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, v. 79, p. 433–442. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.023 Wallace J.B.; Webster, J.R. 1996. The role of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystem function. Annual Reviews, v. 41, p. 115–139. https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.000555 Wichard W. 2013. Overview and descriptions of Trichoptera in Baltic Amber: Spicipalpia and Integripalpia. Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Verlag Kessel, Remagen-Oberwinter, 229p.pt_BR
dc.type.degreeDoutoradopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Tese (PPGBioEvo)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
TCC_Tese_Rafael_Pereira_da_Silva.pdfTCC_Tese_Rafael_Pereira_da_Silva8,59 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.