1. Universidade Federal da Bahia
  2. Instituto de Biologia - IBIO
  3. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia: Teoria, Aplicação e Valores (PÓS-ECOLOGIA)
  4. Tese (Pós-Ecologia)
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/36262
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorLima, Danilo Sabino da Silva-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-04T17:14:19Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-04T17:14:19Z-
dc.date.issued2022-08-15-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/36262-
dc.description.abstractHuman activities have caused widespread changes to natural ecosystems in recent centuries and continue to severely threaten biodiversity worldwide. Among the consequences of these activities, we can mention changes in climate and land use cover. Climate change has contributed to marked changes in the geographic distribution of species throughout the planet’s evolutionary history, being considered one of the greatest threats to species diversity and causing a serious impoverishment of biodiversity. The change in land cover influences the availability of suitable habitats and, consequently, the potential population size of the species. Therefore, our goal was to predict the effects of climate and landscape changes on the potential distribution of the yellow-breasted capuchin monkey (Sapajus xanthosternos), a critically endangered species. For that, we carried out, separately, an ecological niche modelling (climate model), habitat adequacy model (landscape model), and an analysis considering these two factors together (additive model). In addition, we verified the landscape characteristics of areas considered suitable, in the long term, for the occurrence of this species, indicating geographic areas that are likely to present favorable conditions for the species to remain in the next 50 years. For each analysis, we calculated adequate total area size; percentage of forest cover; conservation status of the species; percentage of the area protected by conservation units. Finally, we verified the suitability and percentage of forest cover in 14 areas considered important for the conservation of S. xanthosternos, defined within the scope of the National Action Plan for the Conservation of Northeastern Primates (PAN Primatas do Nordeste). We show that the south of the State of Bahia will be responsible, in the long term, for maintaining viable areas for the occurrence of S. xanthosternos. On the other hand, our analyzes predict, a local extirpation of S. xanthosternos in the next 50 years within the Cerrado and Caatinga biomes. We also show that the areas that will remain adequate in the next 50 years will be less complex, and the shape with the lowest perimeter/area ratio, aggregates, will be increasingly continuous and large, making the occurrence of S. xanthosternos in small and isolated fragments each time. increasingly rare. Serra do Conduru, Teimoso-Lontras-Una, and the Reserva Ecológica Michelin proved to be the most suitable areas to maintain populations of S. xanthosternos in the long term. Our results demonstrate the importance of the joint use and application of climate and landscape models to improve and increase the consistency of assessments, especially concerning the definition of priority areas for conservation. Information on landscape features of areas considered suitable for S. xanthosternos, is useful for conservation measures to be taken before extinction thresholds are reached.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia - FAPESBpt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal da Bahiapt_BR
dc.subjectMacaco - prego do- peito-amarelo - Extinçãopt_BR
dc.subjectDistribuição geográficapt_BR
dc.subjectAtividades antrópicaspt_BR
dc.subjectAnálise espacialpt_BR
dc.subjectConservaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectPrimatas do Nordestept_BR
dc.subject.otherExtinctionpt_BR
dc.subject.otherGeographic distributionpt_BR
dc.subject.otherAnthropogenic activitiespt_BR
dc.subject.otherSpatial analysispt_BR
dc.subject.otherConservationpt_BR
dc.subject.otherNortheastern primatespt_BR
dc.titleA influência das mudanças climáticas, uso da terra e características da paisagem na distribuição potencial do macaco-prego-do peito-amararelopt_BR
dc.typeTesept_BR
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia:TAV(antigo Programa de Pós em Ecologia e Biomonitoramento) pt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFBApt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqCNPQ::CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIApt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqCNPQ::CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ZOOLOGIApt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Japyassú, Hilton Ferreira-
dc.contributor.advisor1IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-5460pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9708517516877630pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Japyassú, Hilton Ferreira-
dc.contributor.referee2Diele-Viegas, Luisa Maria-
dc.contributor.referee3Canale, Gustavo Rodrigues-
dc.contributor.referee4Beltrão-Mendes, Raone-
dc.contributor.referee5Gouveia, Sidney Feitosa-
dc.creator.IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8641-0101pt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7241302067933944pt_BR
dc.description.resumoAs atividades humanas causaram alterações generalizadas nos ecossistemas naturais nos últimos séculos, e continuam ameaçando severamente a biodiversidade em todo o mundo. Dentre as consequências dessas atividades podemos citar as mudanças no clima e na cobertura do uso da terra. As mudanças climáticas vêm contribuindo para mudanças acentuadas na distribuição geográfica de espécies ao longo da história planeta, sendo considerada uma das maiores ameaças à diversidade de espécies, e provocando um grave empobrecimento da biodiversidade. Já a mudança na cobertura da terra influencia a disponibilidade de habitat adequado e, consequentemente, o tamanho potencial das populações naturais. Diante disso, nosso objetivo foi prever os efeitos das mudanças no clima e na paisagem na distribuição potencial do macaco-prego-do-peito-amarelo (Sapajus xanthosternos), espécie criticamente ameaçada. Para tanto, realizamos, separadamente, uma modelagem de nicho ecológico (modelo climático), um modelo de Adequação de Habitat (modelo de paisagem), e uma análise levando em consideração esses dois fatores em conjunto (modelo aditivo). Além disso, verificamos as características da paisagem de áreas consideradas adequadas no longo prazo, para a ocorrência desta espécie, indicando áreas geográficas que, possivelmente, apresentem condições propícias para que a espécie se mantenha nos próximos 50 anos. Para cada análise, calculamos o tamanho de área total adequada; porcentagem de cobertura florestal; estado de conservação da espécie; e porcentagem da área protegida por unidades de conservação. Por fim, verificamos a adequabilidade e a porcentagem de cobertura florestal de 14 áreas consideradas importantes para a conservação de S. xanthosternos, definidas no âmbito do Plano de Ação Nacional para Conservação dos Primatas do Nordeste (PAN Primatas do Nordeste). Mostramos que o Sul do Estado da Bahia será responsável, no longo prazo, por manter áreas viáveis para a ocorrência de S. xanthosternos. Por outro lado, nossas análises preveem, nos próximos 50 anos, uma extirpação local de S. xanthosternos dentro dos biomas Cerrado e Caatinga. Mostramos ainda que as áreas que se manterão adequadas nos próximos 50 anos terão características de paisagem menos complexas, e a forma com menor relação perímetro/área, agregados, cada vez mais contínuos e grandes, tornando ocorrência de S. xanthosternos em fragmentos pequenos e isolados cada vez mais rara. Serra do Conduru, Teimoso-Lontras-Una, e Reserva Ecológica Michelin se mostraram como as áreas mais adequadas para manter populações de S. xanthosternos no longo prazo. Nossos resultados demonstram a importância da utilização e aplicação conjunta dos modelos climáticos e de paisagem para melhorar e aumentar a consistência das avaliações, principalmente no que diz respeito à definição de áreas prioritárias para conservação. Informações sobre as características da paisagem de áreas consideradas adequadas para S. xanthosternos são úteis para que medidas de conservação sejam tomadas antes que os limiares de extinção sejam atingidos.pt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentInstituto de Biologiapt_BR
dc.relation.referencesARAÚJO, M.B., R. J. WHITTAKER, R. J. LADLE AND M. ERHARD. 2005. Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14: 529-538. 17 ARAÚJO, M.B., THUILLER, W. & PEARSON, R.G. 2006. Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 1712–1728. BAKKENES, M., ALKEMADE, J. R. M., IHLE, F., LEEMANS, R., & LATOUR, J. B. 2002. Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Global change biology, 8, 390-407. BOSCOLO, D. 2007. Influência da estrutura da paisagem sobre a persistência de três espécies de aves em paisagens fragmentadas da Mata Atlântica. 2007. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências na Área de Ecologia) – Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. CARO T., SHERMAN P.W. 2011. Endangered species and threatened discipline: behavioural ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:111–118. CARVALHO, J. S., GRAHAM, B., REBELO, H., BOCKSBERGER, G., MEYER, C. F. J., WICH, S., & KÜHL, H. S. 2019. A global risk assessment of primates under climate and land use/cover scenarios. Global Change Biology. 00:1-16 doi:10.1111/gcb.14671 CHAPIN, F. S., MATSON, P. A. AND MOONEY, H. A. 2002. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer Science, New York. CHAPMAN, C. A., CHAPMAN, L. J., STRUHSAKER, T. T., ZANNE, A. E., CLARK, C. J., & POULSEN, J. R. 2005. A long‐term evaluation of fruiting phenology:Importance of climate change. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21(01), 31– 45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467404001993 CORLETT, R.T. 2000. Environmental heterogeneity and species survival in degraded tropical landscapes. In: M.J. Hutchings, E.A. John & A.J.A. Stewart (eds.). The ecological consequences of environmental heterogeneity. pp. 333-355. British Ecological Society, Londres. CRUTZEN, P.J. 2006. The “Anthropocene”. In: Ehlers E & Krafft T (eds.) Earth System Science in the Anthropocene, New York. Pp. 13-18. DA SILVA, L.G.; RIBEIRO, M.C.; HASUI, E.; DA COSTA, C. A.; DA CUNHA, R.G. 2015. Patch size, functional isolation, visibility and matrix permeability influences neotropical primate occurrence within highly fragmented landscapes. PLoS One 10:1 - 20. 18 DAVIS, M.B. & SHAW, R.G. 2001. Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292: 673-679. DE MARCO-JÚNIOR, P. & SIQUEIRA, M.F. 2009. Como determinar a distribuição potencial de espécies sob uma abordagem conservacionista? Megadiversidade, vol. 5, no. 1-2, p. 65-76. DEROCHER, A. E., LUNN, N. J., & STIRLING, I. 2004. Polar bears in a warming climate. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 44, 163-176. ESTRADA, A.; GARBER, P.A.; RYLANDS, A.B.; ROOS, C.; FERNANDEZ-DUQUE, E.; DI FIORE, A.; ANNE-ISOLA NEKARIS, K.; NIJMAN, V.; HEYMANN, E.W.; LAMBERT, J.E.; ROVERO, F.; BARELLI, C.; SETCHELL, J.M.; GILLESPIE, T.R.; MITTERMEIER, R.A.; ARREGOITIA, L.V.; DE GUINEA, M.; GOUVEIA, S.; DOBROVOLSKI, R.; SHANEE, S.; SHANEE, N.; BOYLE, S.A.; FUENTES, A.; MACKINNON, K.C.; AMATO, K.R.; MEYER, A.L.S.; WICH, S.; SUSSMAN, R.W.; PAN, R.; KONE, I.; LI, B. 2017. Impending extinction crisis of the world’s primates: why primates matter. Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600946 FAHRIG, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515. FRANKLIN, A.B.; NOON, B. R. & GEORGE, T. L. 2002. What is habitat fragmentation ? In Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds in western landscapes: contrasts with paradigms from the eastern United States. Cooper Ornithological Society. Studies in Avian Biology No. 25 (eds. T. L. George and D. S. Dobkin), pp. 20–29. FREITAS, C.H., SETZ, E.Z.F., GOBBI, N., ARAUJO, A.R.B. 2008. Agricultural crops in the diet of bearded capuchin monkeys, Cebus libidinosus Spix (Primates: Cebidae), in forest fragments in southeast Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 25:32–39. GARCIA, R.A.; BURGESS, N.D.; CABEZA M.; RAHBEK, C. & ARAÚJO, M.B. 2012. Exploring consensus in 21st century projections of climatically suitable areas for African vertebrates. Glob. Change Biol. 18: 1253-1269. GARCIA, R. A.; CABEZA M.; RAHBEK, C. & ARAÚJO, M.B. 2014. Multiple Dimensions of Climate Change and Their Implications for Biodiversity. Science 344:1247579. 19 GASTÓN A.; GARCÍA-VIÑAS, J.I.; BRAVO-FERNÁNDEZ, A.J.; LÓPEZ-LEIVA, C.; OLIET, J.A.; ROIG, S. & SERRADA, R. 2014. Species distribution models applied to plant species selection in forest restoration: are model predictions comparable to expert opinion? New forests 45: 641-653. GUIMARÃES, A.L. 2005. O desafio de conservar e recuperar a Mata Atlântica: Construindo Corredores de Biodiversidade. In: BATISTA, E. Caminhos da Sustentabilidade no Brasil. Editora: Terra das Arte. 427p. GOUVEIA, S. F., SOUZA‐ALVES, J. P., RATTIS, L., DOBROVOLSKI, R., JERUSALINSKY, L., BELTRÃO‐MENDES, R., & FERRARI, S. F. (2016). Climate and land use changes will degrade the configuration of the landscape for titi monkeys in eastern Brazil. Global Change Biology, 22(6), 2003–2012. https ://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13162 IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assess-ment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis report. JABLONSKI, N. G., WHITFORT, M. J., ROBERTS‐SMITH, N., & QINQI, X. 2000. The influence of life history and diet on the distribution of catarrhine primates during the Pleistocene in eastern Asia. Journal of Human Evolution, 39(2), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1006/ jhev.2000.0405 JANSON CH. 2000. Primate socio‐ecology: the end of the golden age. Evolutionary Anthropology 9:73–86. LEDIG, F. T. 2012. Climate change and conservation. Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica, 8, 57-74. LINDENMAYER, D.B., FISCHER J. 2007. Tackling the habitat fragmentation panchreston. Trends Ecol Evol 22:127–132 MCCLEAN, C. J., LOVETT, J. C., KÜPER, W., HANNAH, L., SOMMER, J. H., BARTHLOTT, W., … TAPLIN, J. R. D. 2005. African plant diversity and climate change. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 92, 139–152. 20 METZGER, J.P. 2001. O que é ecologia de paisagens? Biota Neotropica, 1(2):1-9. MILTON, K., & GIACALONE, J. 2014. Differential effects of unusual climatic stress on capuchin (Cebus capucinus) and howler monkey (Alouatta palliata) populations on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. American Journal of Primatology, 76, 249–261. MYERS, N.; MITTERMEIER, R.A.; MITTERMEIER, C.G.; FONSECA, G.A.B. KENT, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403:853–858. PARMESAN, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 37, 637-669. PETERSON, A.T. & KLUZA, D.A. 2005. Ecological niche modeling as a new paradigm for large-scale investigations of diversity and distribution of birds. In RALPH, J.C. & RICH, T.D. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Third International Partners in Flight Conference, 2002, Asilomar. Albany: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. p. 1201-1204. PÖRTNER, H. O., & FARRELL, A. P. 2008. Ecology: physiology and climate change. Science, 322, 690-692. POST, E., PETERSON, R. O., STENSETH, N. C., & MCLAREN, B. E. 1999. Ecosystem consequences of wolf behavioural response to climate. Nature, 401, 905-907. RODRIGUES, P.M.S; SILVA, J.O.; EISENLOHR, P.V. & SCHAEFER, C.E.G.R. 2015. Climate change effects on the geographic distribution of specialist tree species of the Brazilian tropical dry forests. Brazilian Journal of Biology 75: 679-684. RIBEIRO, M.C.; METZGER, J.P.; MARTENSEN, A.C.; PONZONI, F.J.; HIROTA, M.M. 2009. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 142:1141-1153. ROCHA, J. M. D. A., PINTO, M. P., BOUBLI, J. P., & GRELLE, C. E. V. 2015. The role of competition in structuring primate communities under different productivity regimes in the Amazon. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0145699. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145699 21 ROCHA-SANTOS, L. ET AL. 2016. The shrinkage of a forest: landscape-scale deforestation leading to overall changes in local forest structure. Biological Conservation, Boston, v. 196, p. 1-9. ROOT, T. L., PRICE, J. T., HALL, K. R., SCHNEIDER, S. H., ROSENZWEIG, C., & POUNDS, J. A. 2003. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature, 421, 57-60. SALA, O. E. et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, Washington, v. 287, p. 1770-1774. SANTOS, R.R. 2010. Uso de Ferramentas por Macacos‐Prego em Manguezais [dissertation]. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil. SCHLOSS, C. A., NUÑEZ, T. A., & LAWLER, J. J. 2012. Dispersal will limit ability of mammals to track climate change in the Western Hemisphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(22), 8606–8611. SILVA, M. A. F., HIGUCHI, P. & SILVA, A. C. 2018. Impacto de mudanças climáticas sobre a distribuição geográfica potencial de Ilex paraguariensis. Rodriguésia 69(4): 2069-2079. SOS MATA ATLÂNTICA. 2014. Atlas dos remanescentes florestais da Mata Atlântica: Período 2012 -2013. Disponível em: <http://www.sos-ma.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/atlas_2012-2013_relatorio_tecnico_20141.pdf >. Acesso em 15 dez. 2015. SPEHAR, S. N., SHEIL, D., HARRISON, T., LOUYS, J., ANCRENAZ, M., MARSHALL, A. J., … MEIJAARD, E. 2018. Orangutans venture out of the rainforest and into the Anthropocene. Science Advances, 4(6), e1701422. https ://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701422 STRUEBIG, M. J., FISCHER, M., GAVEAU, D. L. A., MEIJAARD, E., WICH, S. A., GONNER, C., … KRAMER‐SCHADT, S. 2015. Anticipated climate and land‐ cover changes reveal refuge areas for Borneo’s orang‐utans. Global Change Biology, 21(8), 2891–2904. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12814 TABARELLI, M., J.M.C. SILVA & C. GASCON. 2004. Forest fragmentation, synergisms and the impoverishment of neotropical forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 13: 1419- 1425. 22 THOMAS, C. D., CAMERON, A., GREEN, R. E., BAKKENES, M., BEAUMONT, L. J., COLLINGHAM, Y. C., … WILLIAMS, S. E. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature, 427(6970), 145–148. THUILLER, W., LAVOREL, S., ARAÚJO, M. B., SYKES, M. T., & PRENTICE, I. C. 2005. Climate change threats plant diversity in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 8245–8250 . TITEUX, N., HENLE, K., MIHOUB, J.‐B., REGOS, A., GEIJZENDORFFER, I. R., CRAMER, W., … BROTONS, L. 2017. Global scenarios for biodiver‐ sity need to better integrate climate and land use change. Diversity and Distributions, 23(11), 1231–1234. https://doi.org/10.1111/ ddi.12624 VIANA, V.M. 1995. Conservação da biodiversidade de fragmentos de florestas tropicais em paisagens intensivamente cultivadas. In: Abordagens interdisciplinares para a conservação da biodiversidade e dinâmica do uso da terra no novo mundo. Belo Horizonte/Gainesville: Conservation International do Brasil/Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais/ University of Florida. p. 135-154. WIEDERHOLT, R., & POST, E. 2010. Tropical warming and the dynamics of endangered primates. Biology Letters, 6(2), 257–260. https://doi. org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0710. ALMEIDA, L.F.; LIMA, M. F.; BRAGA, M. S.; MATTOS, C. N.; KALE, F. L. D. 2010. Diagnóstico de áreas potenciais para recuperação de área degradada, em região de extração de areia, com uso de sedimento de canal de adução de água e lodo de estação de tratamento de esgoto. X Simpósio Ítalo-Brasileiro de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental. Maceió. ARAÚJO, M.B., GUISAN, A. 2006. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. J. Biogeogr. 33, 1677–1688. ASNER, G.P., LOARIE, S.R., HEYDER, U. 2010. Combined effects of climate and land-use change on the future of humid tropical forests. Conserv. Lett. 3, 395–403. BARBET-MASSIN M.; THUILLER W.; & JIGUET F. 2012. The fate of European breeding birds under climate, land-use and dispersal scenarios. Global Change Biology 18:881-890. BEALE C.M. et al. 2013. Protected area networks and savannah bird biodiversity in the face of climate change and land degradation. Ecology Letters, v. 16, p. 1061–1068. BEAUMONT, L.J.; GALLAGHER, R.V.; DOWNEY, P.O.; THUILLER, W.; LEISHMAN, M.R.; HUGHES, L. 2009. Modelling the impact of Hieracium spp. on protected areas in Australia under future climates. Ecography, v. 32, p. 757-764. BERRY P.M.; WHITTAKER M.; LADLE R.J. 2005. Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change. Global Ecology & Biogeography, n. 14, p. 529-538. BOYLE, S. A. et al. 2013. Primates of the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project: A History. In: MARSH, L. K.; CHAPMAN, C. (Eds.). Primates in Fragments: complexity and resilience. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. p. 57-74. BROOK, B.W., SODHI, N.S., BRADSHAW, C.J.A. 2008. Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 453–460. BROWN J.L. & YODER, A.D. 2015. Shifting ranges and conservation challenges for lemurs in the face of climate change. Ecology and Evolution, 5(6), 1131–1142. BUCKLEY, L. B.; URBAN, M. C.; ANGILLETTA, M. J.; CROZIER, L. G.; RISSLER, L. J. & SEARS, M. W. 2010. Can mechanisms inform species’ distribution models? Ecology Letters 13:1041-1054. CANALE, G.R.; GUIDORIZZI, C.E.; KIERULFF, M.C.M.; GATTO, C.A.F.R. 2009 First record of tool use by wild populations of the yellow-breasted capuchin monkey (Cebus xanthosternos) and New record for the bearded capuchin (cebus libidinosus). American Journal of Primatology, 71(5):366-372. CANALE G.R. et al. 2012. Pervasive Defaunation of Forest Remnants in a Tropical Biodiversity Hotspot. PLoS. ONE, v. 7, n. 8, e41671. CANALE, R. G; KIERULFF, M. C. M; CHIVERS, D. J. 2013. A Critically Endangered Capuchin Monkey (Sapajus xanthosternos) Living in a Highly Fragmented Hotspot. In: MARSH, L. K.; CHAPMAN, C. (Ed.). Primates in Fragments: Complexity and Resilience. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. 559 p. 45 CANHOS V. P.; SIQUEIRA M.F.; MARINO A.; CANHOS D.A.L. 2008. Análise da vulnerabilidade da biodiversidade brasileira frente às mudanças climáticas globais. Parcerias estratégicas, n, 27. CHAPMAN C.A.; CHAPMAN L.J.; STRUHSAKER T.T.; ZANNE A.E.; CLARK C.J.; & POULSEN J.R. 2005. A long‐term evaluation of fruiting phenology: Importance of climate change. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21(01), 31–45. COIMBRA-FILHO AF; RYLANDS A.B.; PISSINATI A.; & SANTOS I.B. 1991/92. The distribution and status of the buff-headed capuchin monkey, Cebus xanthosternos Wied 1820, in the Atlantic Forest region of eastern Brazil Primate Conservation 12-13:24-30. COIMBRA-FILHO, A.F.; ROCHA E SILVA, R. E PISSINATTI, A. 1991. Acerca da distribuição geográfica original de Cebus apella xanthosthernos Wied, 1820 (Cebidae, Primates). A Primatologia no Brasil 3: 215-224. CORRÊA, R.S. 2007. Recuperação de áreas degradadas pela mineração no Cerrado: Manual para revegetação. 2.ed. Brasília: Universa, 2007. 187p. CRUTZEN, P.J. 2006. The “Anthropocene”. In: Ehlers E & Krafft T (eds.) Earth System Science in the Anthropocene, New York. Pp. 13-18. DAVIS, M.B. & SHAW, R.G. 2001. Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292: 673-679. DAVIS, M.B. & SHAW, R.G. 2001. Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292: 673-679. DEUTSCH, C. A.; TEWKSBURY, J. J.; HUEY, R. B.; SHELDON, K. S.; GHALAMBOR, C. K.; HAAK, D. C. & MARTIN, P. R. 2008. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude Thermal Safety margin. PNAS 105:6668-6672. DINIZ-FILHO, J. A. F.; NABOUT, J. C.; BINI, L. M.; LOYOLA, R. D.; RANGEL, T. F.; NOGUÉS-BRAVO, D. & ARAÚJO, M. B. 2010. Ensemble forecasting shifts in climatically suitable areas for Tropidacris cristata (Orthoptera: Acridoidea: Romaleidae). Insect Conservation and Diversity 3:213-221. ELITH, J., C.H. GRAHAM, R.P. ANDERSON, M. DUDIK, S. FERRIER, A. GUISAN, R.J. HIJMANS, F. HUETTMANN, J.R. LEATHWICK, A. LEHMANN, J. LI, L.G. LOHMANN, B.A. LOISELLE, G. MANION, C. MORITZ, M. NAKAMURA, Y. NAKAZAWA, J.M. OVERTON, A.T. PETERSON, S.J. PHILLIPS, K. RICHARDSON, R. SCACHETTI-PEREIRA, R.E. SCHAPIRE, J. SOBERON, S. WILLIAMS, M.S. WISZ & N.E. ZIMMERMANN. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species distributions from occurrence data. Ecography v.29 p.129-151. ESTRADA R.A.; GARBER P.A.; MITTERMEIER R.A.; WICH S.; GOUVEIA S.; DOBROVOLSKI R.; et al. 2018. Primates in peril: the significance of Brazil, Madagascar, Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo for global primate conservation. PeerJ, n. 6, e4869. FALEIRO, F. V., MACHADO, R.B. & R. D. LOYOLA. 2013. Defining spatial conservation priorities in the face of land-use and climate change. Biol. Conserv. 158: 248-257. FAO. 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Global Forest Resources. Assessment 2010. FAO Forestry Paper 163 In. 46 FERRANTE L. & FEARNSIDE P.M. 2019. Brazil’s new president and ‘ruralists’ threaten Amazonia’s environment, traditional peoples and the global climate. Environmental Conservation, n. 46, p. 261–263. FLESHER, K. M. 2015. The Distribution, Habitat Use, and Conservation Status of Three Atlantic Forest Monkeys (Sapajus xanthosternos, Callicebus melanochir, Callithrix sp.) in an Agroforestry/Forest Mosaic in Southern Bahia, Brazil. International Journal of Primatology, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1172-1197. FRANKLIN, J. 2010. Mapping Species Distribution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 338p. FUENTES A. 2006. Human-Nonhuman primate interconnections and their relevance to anthropology. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, n. 2, p. 1–11. MUANIS, M.M.; SERRÃO, M.; GELUDA, L. 2009. Quanto custa uma unidade de conservação federal? : uma visão estratégica para o financiamento do Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação (Snuc) Rio de Janeiro: Funbio, 52p. FUNDAÇÃO SOS MATA ATLÂNTICA - SOSMA & INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS - INPE. 2018. Atlas dos remanescentes florestais da Mata Atlântica período 2015 – 2018. Relatório Parcial. Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica / Instituto Nacional dte Pesquisas Espaciais, São Paulo, 156p. GADSDEN H.; BALLESTEROS-BARRERA C.; HINOJOSA DE LA GARZA O.; CASTAÑEDA G.; GARCÍA-DE LA PEÑA C. & LEMOS-ESPINAL J.A. 2012. Effects of land-cover transformation and climate change on the distribution of two endemic lizards, Crotaphytus antiquus and Sceloporus cyanostictus, of northern Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments 83:1-9. GARCIA, M. CABEZA, C. RAHBEK & M. B. ARAÚJO. 2014. Multiple Dimensions of Climate Change and Their Implications for Biodiversity. Science 344:1247579. GELDMANN J.; BARNES M.; COAD L.; CRAIGIE I.D.; HOCKINGS M.; & BURGESS N.D. 2013. Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biological Conservation, n. 161, p. 230–238. GIBSON L, LEE TM, KOH LP, ET AL. 2011. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478:378-383. GOUVEIA S.F.; SOUZA‐ALVES J.P.; RATTIS, L.; DOBROVOLSKI R.; JERUSALINSKY L.; BELTRÃO‐MENDES R.; & FERRARI S.F. 2016. Climate and land use changes will degrade the configuration of the landscape for titi monkeys in eastern Brazil. Global Change Biology, 22(6), 2003–2012. GRAY C.L.; HILL S.L.L.; NEWBOLD T.; HUDSON L.N.; BÖRGER L.; CONTU S; et al. 2016. Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nature Communications, n. 7, p. 12306. GUISAN A. & THUILLER W. 2005. Predicting species distribution: Offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett. n. 8, p. 993–1009. HARTLEY, S.; KRUSHELNYCKY, P. D. & LESTER, P. J. 2010. Integrating physiology, population dynamics and climate to make multi-scale predictions for the spread of an invasive insect: the Argentine ant at Haleakala National Park, Hawaii. Ecography 33:83-94. 47 HODD R.L.; BOURKE D. & SKEFFINGTON M.S. 2014. Projected Range Contractions of 666 European Protected Oceanic Montane Plant Communities: Focus on Climate 667 Change Impacts Is Essential for Their Future Conservation. PLoS ONE 9: e95147. HOF, C., LEVINSKY, I., ARAÚJO, M.B., RAHBEK, C. 2011. Rethinking species’ ability to cope with rapid climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2987–2990. HOOPER, D.U.; CHAPIN, F.S.; EWEL, J.J.; HECTOR, A.; INCHAUSTI, P.; LAVOREL, S.; LAWTON, J.H.; LODGE, D.M.; LOREAU, M.; NAEEM, S.; SCHMID, B.; SETALA, H.; SYMSTAD, A.J.; VANDERMEER, J.; WARDLE, D.A. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75, 3–35. INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE - IPCC. 2007. Summary for policymakers. [S.l.]. IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Geneva: IPCC, 151p. IPCC, 2014: Alterações Climáticas 2014: Impactos, Adaptação e Vulnerabilidade - Resumo para Decisores. Contribuição do Grupo de Trabalho II para o Quinto Relatório de Avaliação do Painel Intergovernamental sobre Alterações Climáticas [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea e L.L. White (eds.)]. Organização Meteorológica Mundial (WMO), Genebra, Suíça, 34 p.IUCN. 2001. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Version 3.1. In (pp. 30). IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. In Press. IUCN. 2015. International Union for Conservation of Nature. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Disponível em <http://www.iucnredlist.org>. Acesso em: 22/05/2018. IUCN. 2018. The Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2018-2. iucnredlist.org [accessed 02 August 2018]. JEROZOLIMSKI, A.; PERES, C. 2003. Bringing back the biggest bacon: a cross-site analysis of the structure of hunter-kill profiles in Neotropical forests. Biological Conservation v.111, p.415-425. KIERULFF, M.C.M. et al. 2004. The use of camera-traps in a survey of the buff-headed capuchin monkey, Cebus xanthosternos. Neotropical Primates, v.12, n.2, p.56-59. KIERULFF, M.C.M.; MENDES, S.L.; RYLANDS, A. B. 2015. Sapajus xanthosternos. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Disponível em <www.iucnredlist.org>. Acesso em: 16/05/2019. KRIEGLER E.; EDMONDS J.; HALLEGATTE S.; EBI K.L.; KRAM T.; RIAHI K.; WINKLER H.; VAN VUUREN D.P. 2014. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions. Climate Change, n.122, pp. 401-414. 48 KUPFER, J.A.; MALANSON, G.P. AND FRANKLIN S.B. 2006. Not seeing the ocean for the islands: the mediating influence of matrix-based processes on forest fragmentation effects. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15, 8-20. LAURANCE, W. F.; YENSEN, E. 1991. Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. Biological Conservation, Boston, v. 55, p. 77-92. LEAL, I. R.; SILVA, J.D.; TABARELLI, M.; LACHER, T.E. 2005. Mudando o curso da conservação da biodiversidade na Caatinga do Nordeste do Brasil. Megadiversidade, v. 1, n. 1, p. 139-146. LERNOULD, J.M.; KIERULFF, M.C.M.; CANALE, G. 2012. Yellow-breasted capuchin Cebus xanthosternos: support by zoos for its conservation – a sucess story. International Zoo Yearbook, 46 (1), 71-79. LOYOLA, R.D., C. G. BECKER, U. KUBOTA, C. F. B. HADDAD, C. R. FONSECA & T. M. LEWINSOHN. 2008. Hung out to dry: choice of priority ecoregions for conserving threatened Neotropical anurans depend on their life-history traits. PLoS ONE 3: e2120. LYNCH-ALFARO J.; IZAR P.; FERREIRA, R.G. 2014. Capuchin monkey research priorities and urgent issues. American Journal Primatology, v. 76, p. 705-720. MANDUJANO S.; ESCOBEDO-MORALES L.A.; & PALACIOS-SILVA R. 2004. Movements of Alouatta palliata among forest fragments in Los Tuxtla, México. Neotropical Primates, n. 12, p. 126–131. MANTYKA-PRINGLE, C.S., MARTIN, T.G., RHODES, J.R. 2011. Interactions between climate and habitat loss effects on biodiversity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 1239–1252. MATSUSHITA, B.; XU, M.; FUKUSHIMA, T. 2006.Characterizing the changes in landscape structure in the Lake Kasumigaura, Japan using a high-quality GIS dataset. Ladscape and Urban Planning, v.78, p.241-250. MCKENNEY D.W. et al. 2007. Beyond Traditional Hardiness Zones: Using Climate Envelopes to Map Plant Range Limits. BioScience, v. 57, n. 11, p. 929. MENDOZA, M. E.; GRANADOS, E. L.; GENELETTI, D.; PÉREZ-SALICRUP, D. R.; SALINAS, V. 2011. Analysing land cover and land use change process at watershed level: A multitemporal study in the Lake Cuitzeo Watershed, Mexico (1975-2003). Applied Geography, v.31, p.237-350. MEYER A.L.S.; PIE M.R.; & PASSOS F.C. 2014. Assessing the exposure of lion tamarins (Leontopithecus spp.) to future climate change. American Journal of Primatology, 76(6), 551–562. MMA (MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE). 2018. Cadastro Nacional de Unidades de Conservação. mma.gov.br/areas-protegidas/cadastro-nacional-de-ucs [accessed 02 August 2018]. MOLLOY, S. et al. 2019. Using climate change models to inform the recovery of the western ground parrot Pezoporus flaviventris. Oryx, v. 54, n. 1, p. 52-61. MÜLLER, M.W.; VALLE, R.R. Ecofisiologia do cultivo do cacaueiro. 2012. In: VALLE, R.R, Ciência, tecnologia e manejo do cacaueiro. Brasília: CEPLAC/CEPEC, p.31-66. 49 MYERS, N. et al. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, v.403, p.853-858. NASCIMENTO R.A.; SCHIAVETTI A.; & MONTAÑO R.A.M. 2013. An assessment of illegal capuchin monkey trade in Bahia State, Brazil. Neotropical Biology and Conservation, n. 8, p. 79–87. NORI, J.; URBINA-CARDONA, J. N.; LOYOLA, R. D.; LESCANO, J. N. & LEYNAUD, G. C. 2011. Climate Change and American Bullfrog Invasion: What Could We Expect in South America? PLoS ONE 6:e25718. OLIVEIRA A.P.C. & BERNARD E. 2017. The financial needs vs. The realities of in situ conservation: an analysis of federal funding for protected areas in Brazil’s Caatinga. Biotropica, n. 49, p. 745–752. OLIVEIRA D.G.R. 2015. Primatas do Cerrado: conservação, biogeografia e mudanças climáticas. Tese de doutorado. Programa de pós-graduação em Ecologia, Universidade de Brasilia. 258p. OLIVEIRA M.M.; LANGGUTH, A. 2006. Rediscovery of Marcgrave’s capuchin monkey and designation of a neotype for Símia Flavia Schreber, 1774 (Primates, Cebidae). Boletim do Museu Nacional, nova série, Rio de Janeiro, v. 523, p. 1–16. OPDAM P.; WASHER D. 2004. Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biological Conservation, v. 117, p. 285-297. OPPENHEIMER, M.; CAMPOS, M. & WARREN, R. (CLAs) et al. 2014. "Emergent Risks and Key Vulnerabilities". In: IPCC. Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. PANIGAI, G.F.V. 2018. Avaliação dos impactos das mudanças climáticas futuras sobre a distribuição e a conservação das espécies do gênero Sapajus (primates, cebidae). Dissertação de mestrado. Programa de pós-graduação em Ciências biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. 58p. FRANCO, E.M.P. 2021. Sombra e água fresca: a água de coco como recurso indispensável para os Sapajus xanthosternos no manguezal. Dissertação de mestrado. Programa de pós-graduação em Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal da Bahia. 31p. PBMC. 2013. Contribuição do Grupo de Trabalho 1 ao Primeiro Relatório de Avaliação nacional do Painel Brasileiro de Mudanças Climáticas. Sumário Executivo GT1. PBMC, Rio de Janeiro, 24p. PEARSON, R.G.; DAWSON T.P. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?. Global Ecology & Biogeography, n. 12, p. 361-371. PETERSON, A.T. 2001. Predicting species geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. CONDOR, n. 103, p. 599-605. PETIT J.R.; JOUZEL J.; RAYNAUD D.; BARKOV N.I.; BARNOLA J.M.; BASILE I.; BENDER M.; CHAPPELLAZ J.; DAVIS M.; DELAYGUE G.; DELMOTTE M.; KOTLYAKOV V.M.; LEGRAND M.; LIPENKOV V.Y.; LORIUS C.; PÉPIN L.; RITZ C.; SALTZMAN E.; & 50 STIEVENARD M. 1999. Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature 399:429-436. PHILLIPS, S. J. & DUDÍK, M. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography, 31, 161-175. PHILLIPS, S.J., R.P. ANDERSON & R.E. SCHAPIRE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions.Ecological Modelling v. 190 p. 231 -259. PINTO, L. P.; BEDÊ, L.; PAESE, A.; FONSECA, M.; PAGLIA, A.; LAMAS, I. 2006. Mata Atlântica Brasileira: os desafios para conservação da biodiversidade de um hotspot mundial. In: ROCHA, C. F. D.; BERGALLO, H. G.; SLUYS, M. V.; ALVES, M. A. S. (Eds.). Biologia da Conservação: essências. São Carlos: RiMa. p. 91-118. PIRES, A.P.F.; SRIVASTAVA, D.S.; FARJALLA, V.F. 2018. “Is Biodiversity Able to Buffer Ecosystems from Climate Change? What We Know and What We Don’t“. BioScience, v. 68, Issue 4, 1:273–280. POPP A.; CALVIN K.; FUJIMORI S.; HAVLIK P.; HUMPENÖDER F.; STEHFEST E.; BODIRSKY B. L. et al. 2017. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Global Environmental Change, n. 42, p. 331-345. PORTILLO-QUINTERO C.A. & SÁNCHEZ-AZOFEIFA G.A. 2010. Extent and conservation of tropical dry forests in the Americas. Biological Conservation, n. 143, p. 144–155. PRESOTTO A.; REMILLARD C.; SPAGNOLETTI N.; SALMI R.; VERDERANE M.; STAFFORD K.; SANTOS R.R.; MADDEN M.; FRAGASZY D.; VISALBERGHI E. & IZAR P. 2020. Rare Bearded Capuchin (Sapajus libidinosus) Tool-Use Culture is Threatened by Land use Changes in Northeastern Brazil. International Journal of Primatology v. 41, p. 596–613. PRIMACK R.B. & RODRIGUES E. 2001. Biologia da conservação. Londrina: Ed. Planta, VIII, 328p. RADCHUK, V.; REED, T.; TEPLITSKY, C. et al. 2019. Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient. Nature Communications. 10, 3109. RIBEIRO M.C.; MARTENSEN A.C.; METZGER J.P.; TABARELLI M.; SCARANO F.; & FORTIN M.J. 2011. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: a shrinking biodiversity hotspot. In Biodiversity Hotspots (eds F.E. Zachos & J.C. Habel), pp. 405–433. Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany. ROCHA J.M.D.A.; PINTO M.P.; BOUBLI J.P.; & GRELLE C.E.V. 2015. The role of competition in structuring primate communities under different productivity regimes in the Amazon. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0145699. ROOT, T.L., J.T. PRICE, K.R. HALL, S.H. SCHNEIDER, C. ROSENZWEIG & J.A. POUNDS. 2003. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421: 57-60. RYLANDS, A.B. 1982. The behaviour and ecology of three species of marmosets and tamarins (Callitrichidae, Primates) in Brazil. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Cambridge. RYLANDS, A. 2003. Official List of Brazilian Fauna Threatened with Extinction - 2003. Neotropical Primates, v.11, n.1, p. 43-49. 51 SALA, O.E., III, F.S.C., ARMESTO, J.J., BERLOW, E., BLOOMFIELD, J., DIRZO, R., HUBER-SANWALD, E., HUENNEKE, L.F., JACKSON, R.B., KINZIG, A., LEEMANS, R., LODGE, D.M., MOONEY, H.A., POFF, N.L., SYKES, M.T., WALKER, B.H., WALKER, M. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287, 1770–1774. SALAZAR, L.F., NOBRE, C.A., OYAMA, M.D. 2007. Climate change consequences on the biome distribution in tropical South America. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, 1–6. SALGADO-LABOURIAU M.L. 1994. História Ecológica da Terra. Editora Edgard Blucher Ltda., São Paulo - SP Brazil SAOUT S.L.; HOFFMANN M.; SHI Y.; HUGHES A.; BERNARD C.; BROOKS T.M. et al. 2013. Protected areas and effective biodiversity conservation. Science, n.342, p. 803-805. SCHWEIGER O.; SETTELE J.; KUDRNA O.; KLOTZ S. & KÜHN I. 2008. Climate change can 750 cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. Ecology, 89:3472–3479. SILVA, P. L. A. 2018. Biodiversidade e mudanças climáticas no Brasil: levantamento e sistematização de referências. WWF Brasil (Relatório). Brasília, 60 p. SILVA JÚNIOR J.S. 2001. Especiação nos macacos-prego e caiararas, gênero Cebus Erxleben, 1777 (Primates, Cebidae), 377 f. Tese de doutorado. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro. SILVA, L.G.; RIBEIRO, M.C.; HASUI, É.; DA COSTA, C.A.; CUNHA, R.G.T. 2015. Patch size, functional isolation, visibility and matrix permeability influences neotropical primate occurrence within highly fragmented landscapes. PloS One, v. 10, n. 2, p. 1-20. SOUZA-ALVES J.P.; MOURTHE I.; HILÁRIO R.R.; BICCA-MARQUES J.C.; REHG J.; GESTICH C.C.; et al. 2019. Terrestrial behavior in titi monkeys (Callicebus, Cheracebus, and Plecturocebus): potential correlates, patterns, and differences between genera. International Journal of Primatology, n. 40, p. 533–572. STRUEBIG M.J.; FISCHER M.; GAVEAU D.L.A.; MEIJAARD E.; WICH S.A.; GONNER, C.; … KRAMER‐SCHADT S. 2015. Anticipated climate and land cover bchanges reveal refuge areas for Borneo’s orang‐utans. Global Change Biology, 21(8), 2891–2904. SWETS, J.A. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285-1293. TABARELLI, M.; GASCON, C. 2005. Lessons from fragmentation research: improving management and policy guidelines for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, v. 19, n. 3, p. 734-739. TABARELLI, M.; SILVA, J. M. C.; GASCON, C. 2004. Forest fragmentation, synergisms and the impoverishment of neotropical forests. Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 13, p. 1419-1425. THORNTON, D.H.; BRANCH, L.C.; SUNQUIST, M.E. 2011. The relative influence of habitat loss and fragmentation: Do tropical mammals meet the temperate paradigm? Ecological Applications, v. 21, n. 6, p. 2324-2333. THUILLER W.; RICHARDSON D.M; KPYSEK P.; MIDGLEY G.F.; HUGHES, G.O.; ROUGET M. 2005. Niche-based modeling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Global Change Biology, v. 11, n. 12, p. 2234–2250. ALADOS, C.L., ESCOS, J.M.; EMLEN, J.M. 1996. Fractal structure of sequential behaviour patterns: an indicator of stress. Anim. Behav. 51(2), 437 443. ALCOCER‐RODRÍGUEZ, M.; ARROYO‐RODRÍGUEZ, V.; GALÁN‐ACEDO, C.; CRISTÓBAL‐AZKARATE, J.; ASENSIO, N.; RITO, K.F.; HAWES, J.E.; VEÀ, J.J.; DUNN, J. C. 2020. Evaluating extinction debt in fragmented forests: the rapid recovery of a critically endangered primate. Animal Conservation, https://doi-org.ez18.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1111/acv.12648 ALMEIDA, C.G. 2008. Análise espacial dos fragmentos florestais na área do Parque Nacional dos Campos Gerais, Paraná. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa. 72p. ALMEIDA-ROCHA, J.M. D., PERES, C.A., & OLIVEIRA, L.C. 2017. Primate responses to anthropogenic habitat disturbance: A pantropical meta-analysis. Biological Conservation, 215, 30–38. ARAÚJO, M.B., GUISAN, A. 2006. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. J. Biogeography. 33,1677–1688. ARROYO-RODRÍGUEZ, V.; FAHRIG, L. 2014. Why is a landscape perspective importante in studies of primates? American Journal of Primatology, doi: 10.1002/ajp.22282 ARROYO-RODRÍGUEZ, V.; GONZÁLEZ-PEREZ, I. M.; GARMENDIA, A.; SOLÀ, M.; ESTRADA, A. 2013. The relative impact of forest patch and landscape attributes on black howler monkey populations in the fragmented Lacandona rainforest, Mexico. Landscape Ecology, v. 28, n. 9, p. 1717-1727. 81 ARROYO-RODRÍGUEZ, V.; MANDUJANO, S. 2009. Conceptualization and measurement of habitat fragmentation from the primates’ perspective. International Journal of Primatology, v. 30, n. 3, p. 497-514. ARROYO-RODRÍGUEZ, V.; MANDUJANO, S.; CUENDE-FANTON, C. 2005. Ocupación de parches de selva por monos aulladores Alouatta palliata mexicana en tres paisajes con diferente grado de fragmentación en Los Tuxtlas, México. Universidad y Ciencia, v. 2, p. 23-34. ASNER, G.P., LOARIE, S.R., HEYDER, U. 2010. Combined effects of climate and land-use change on the future of humid tropical forests. Conserv. Lett. 3, 395–403. BEAUMONT, L.J.; GALLAGHER, R.V.; DOWNEY, P.O.; THUILLER, W.; LEISHMAN, M.R.; HUGHES, L. 2009. Modelling the impact of Hieracium spp. on protected areas in Australia under future climates. Ecography, v. 32, p. 757-764. BENCHIMOL, M.; PERES, C.A. 2014. Predicting primate local extinctions within “realworld” forest fragments: a pan-neotropical analysis. American Journal of Primatology, v. 76, n. 3, p. 289-302. BENDER, D. J.; CONTRERAS, T. A.; FAHRIG, L. 1998. Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of the patch size effect. Ecology, Durham, v. 79, n. 2, p. 517-533. BEZERRA, B.M.; BASTOS, M.; SOUTO, A.; KEASEY, M.P.; EASON, P.; SCHIEL, N.; JONES, G. 2014. Camera Trap Observations of Nonhabituated Critically Endangered Wild Blonde Capuchins, Sapajus flavius (Formerly Cebus flavius). Int J Primatol 35: 895–907. BOYLE, S.A.; SMITH, A.T. 2010. Can landscape and species characteristics predict primate presence in forest fragments in the Brazilian Amazon? Biological Conservation, v. 143, n. 5, p. 1134-1143. BOYLE, S.A. et al. 2013. Primates of the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project: A History. In: MARSH, L. K.; CHAPMAN, C. (Eds.). Primates in Fragments: complexity and resilience. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. p. 57-74. BRASIL. 2016. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. Sumário executivo do livro vermelho da fauna brasileira ameaçada de extinção. Brasília: ICMBIO. 76 p. BRIFFA, M., RUNDLE, S. D. & FRYER, A. 2008. Comparing the strength of behavioural plasticity and consistency across situations: animal personalities in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society, 275, 1305–11. BROOK, B.W., SODHI, N.S., BRADSHAW, C.J.A. 2008. Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 453–460. BUCKLEY, L. B.; URBAN, M. C.; ANGILLETTA, M. J.; CROZIER, L. G.; RISSLER, L. J. & SEARS, M. W. 2010. Can mechanism inform species’ distribution models? Ecology Letters 13:1041-1054. CANALE, R.G; KIERULFF, M.C.M; CHIVERS, D.J.A. 2013. Critically Endangered Capuchin Monkey (Sapajus xanthosternos) Living in a Highly Fragmented Hotspot. In: MARSH, L. K.; CHAPMAN, C. (Ed.). Primates in Fragments: Complexity and Resilience. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. 559 p. CANALE, G.R.; ALONSO, A.C.; MARTINS, W.P.; JERUSALINSKY, L.; DE MELO, F.R.; KIERULFF, M.C.M.; MITTERMEIER, R.A. & LYNCH ALFARO, J.W. 2021. Sapajus xanthosternos 82 (amended version of 2020 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021: e.T4074A192592138. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-1.RLTS.T4074A192592138.en. Accessed on 02 May 2022. CHIARELLO, A.G. 2000. Conservation value of a native forest fragment in a region of extensive agriculture. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, v.60, n.2, p.237-247. CHIARELLO, A.G. 2000. Influência da caça ilegal sobre mamíferos e aves das matas de tabuleiro do norte do estado do Espírito Santo. Boletim do Museu de Biologia Mello Leitão, Espírito Santo, v. 11/12, p. 229-247. CHIARELLO, A.G. 2003. Primates of brazilian Atlantic forest: the influence of forest fragmentation on survival. In: MARSH, L.K (Ed.). Primates in fragments: ecology and conservation. New York, Kluwer Academic & Plenum Publishers, 428p. p. 99-118. COUTINHO, P.E.G.; CORRÊA, H.K.M. 1995 Polygyny in a free ranging group of buffy-tuffted-ear marmosets, Callithrix aurita. Folia Primatologica 65(1):25-29. CPB - Centro Nacional de Pesquisa e Conservação de Primatas Brasileiros. 2021. Áreas importantes para a conservação de primatas do Nordeste. / Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Brasília: MMA, 11 p. CROUZEILLES, R.; PREVEDELLO, J. A.; FIGUEIREDO, M. D. S. L.; LORINI, M. L.; GRELLE, C. E. V. 2014. The effects of the number, size and isolation of patches along a gradient of native vegetation cover: how can we increment habitat availability? Landscape Ecology, v. 29, n. 3, p. 479-489. CRUTZEN, P.J. 2006. The “Anthropocene”. In: Ehlers E & Krafft T (eds.) Earth System Science in the Anthropocene, New York. Pp. 13-18. DANCEY, C & REIDY, J. 2006. Estatística Sem Matemática para Psicologia: Usando SPSS para Windows. DAVIES-COLLEY, R.J.; PAYNE, G.W. & VAN ELSWIJK, M. 2000. Microclimate gradients across a forest edge. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 24: 111-121 DAVIS, M.B. & SHAW, R.G. 2001. Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292: 673-679. DEUTSCH, C. A.; TEWKSBURY, J. J.; HUEY, R. B.; SHELDON, K. S.; GHALAMBOR, C. K.; HAAK, D. C. & MARTIN, P. R. 2008. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude Thermal Safety margin. PNAS 105:6668-6672. DIDHAN, R.K. & LAWTON, J.H. 1999. Edge structure determines the magnitude of changes in microclimate and vegetation structure in tropical forest fragments. Biotropica 31: 17-30. DINIZ-FILHO, J. A. F., L. M. BINI, T. F. L. V. B. RANGEL, R.D. LOYOLA, C. HOF & M. B. ARAÚJO. 2009. Partitioning and mapping uncertainties in ensembles of forecasts of species turnover under climate change. Ecography 32: 897-906. DINIZ-FILHO, J. A. F., R. D. LOYOLA, P. RAIA, A. O. MOOERS & L. M. BINI. 2013. Darwinian shortfalls in biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28: 689-695. 83 DINIZ-FILHO, J. A. F.; NABOUT, J. C.; BINI, L. M.; LOYOLA, R. D.; RANGEL, T. F.; NOGUÉS-BRAVO, D. & ARAÚJO, M. B. 2010. Ensemble forecasting shifts in climatically suitable areas for Tropidacris cristata (Orthoptera: Acridoidea: Romaleidae). Insect Conservation and Diversity 3:213-221. DIXO, M., METZGER, J. P., MORGANTE, J. S., & ZAMUDIO, K. R. 2009. Habitat fragmentation reduces genetic diversity and connectivity among toad populations in the Brazilian Atlantic Coastal Forest. Biological Conservation, 142(8), 1560–1569. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.11.016 ELITH, J., C.H. GRAHAM, R.P. ANDERSON, M. DUDIK, S. FERRIER, A. GUISAN, R.J. HIJMANS, F. HUETTMANN, J.R. LEATHWICK, A. LEHMANN, J. LI, L.G. LOHMANN, B.A. LOISELLE, G. MANION, C. MORITZ, M. NAKAMURA, Y. NAKAZAWA, J.M. OVERTON, A.T. PETERSON, S.J. PHILLIPS, K. RICHARDSON, R. SCACHETTI-PEREIRA, R.E. SCHAPIRE, J. SOBERON, S. WILLIAMS, M.S. WISZ & N.E. ZIMMERMANN. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species distributions from occurrence data. Ecography v.29 p.129-151. ESTAVILLO, C., PARDINI, R., ROCHA, P.L.B. 2013. Forest Loss and the Biodiversity Threshold: An Evaluation Considering Species Habitat Requirements and the Use of Matrix Habitats. PLoS ONE 8(12): e82369. ESTRADA, A.; GARBER, P.A.; RYLANDS, A.B.; ROOS, C.; FERNANDEZ-DUQUE, E.; DI FIORE, A.; ANNE-ISOLA NEKARIS, K.; NIJMAN, V.; HEYMANN, E.W.; LAMBERT, J.E.; ROVERO, F.; BARELLI, C.; SETCHELL, J.M.; GILLESPIE, T.R.; MITTERMEIER, R.A.; ARREGOITIA, L.V.; DE GUINEA, M.; GOUVEIA, S.; DOBROVOLSKI, R.; SHANEE, S.; SHANEE, N.; BOYLE, S.A.; FUENTES, A.; MACKINNON, K.C.; AMATO, K.R.; MEYER, A.L.S.; WICH, S.; SUSSMAN, R.W.; PAN, R.; KONE, I.; LI, B. 2017. Impending extinction crisis of the world’s primates: why primates matter. Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600946 ESTRADA, A.; GARBER, P. A.; MITTERMEIER, R. A.; WICH, S.; GOUVEIA, S; DOBROVOLSKI, R.; NEKARIS, K.; NIJMAN, V.; RYLANDS, A. B.; MAISELS, F.; WILLIAMSON, E. A.; BICCA-MARQUES, J.; FUENTES, A.; JERUSALINSKY, L.; JOHNSON, S.; RODRIGUES DE MELO, F.; OLIVEIRA, L.; SCHWITZER, C.; ROOS, C.; CHEYNE, S. M.; … SETIAWAN, A. 2018. Primates in peril: the significance of Brazil, Madagascar, Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo for global primate conservation. PeerJ, 6, 1-57, e4869. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4869 FAHRIG, L. 2002. Effect of Habitat Fragmentation on the Extinction Threshold: A Synthesis. Ecological Applications, 12, 346–353. FAHRIG, L. 2003. Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, v. 34, p. 487-515. FAHRIG, L. 2007. Non‐optimal animal movement in human‐altered landscapes. Functional Ecology, v. 21, n. 6, p. 1003-1015. FAHRIG, L. 2013. Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis. Journal of Biogeography, 40(9), 1649-1663. FALEIRO, F. V., MACHADO, R.B. & R. D. LOYOLA. 2013. Defining spatial conservation priorities in the face of land-use and climate change. Biol. Conserv. 158: 248-257. FAO. 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Global Forest Resources. Assessment 2010. FAO Forestry Paper 163 In. 84 FEDIGAN, L.M.; JACK, K.M. 2004. The demographic and reproductive context of male replacements in Cebus capucinus. Behavior, 141 96), 755-775. FEDIGAN, LM. 1993. Sex differences and intersexual relations in adult white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). International Journal of Primatology, vol. 14, p. 853-877. FERRARI, S.F. et al. 2013. Living on the edge: habitat fragmentation at the interface of the semiarid zone in the Brazilian northeast. In: Primates in Fragments. Springer New York. p. 121-135. FERRAZ, G., G. J. RUSSELL, P. C. STOUFFER, R. O. BIERREGAARD, S. L. PIMM, AND T. E. LOVEJOY. 2003. Rates of species loss from Amazonian forest fragments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100:14069-14073. FERREIRA, M.C.S.D. 2017. Influência da fragmentação na ocorrência de três primatas neotropicais ameaçados de extinção no Nordeste do Brasil. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Centro de Biociências. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia - Natal, 2017. 77p. FIELD, A. 2009. Discovering statistics using SPSS (and sex and drugs and rockn roll). Ed. Sage. Third Edition. FISCHER, J.; LINDENMAYER, D. B. 2007. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecology and Biogeography, v. 16, p. 265-280. FLESHER, K. M. 2015. The Distribution, Habitat Use, and Conservation Status of Three Atlantic Forest Monkeys (Sapajus xanthosternos, Callicebus melanochir, Callithrix sp.) in na Agroforestry/Forest Mosaic in Southern Bahia, Brazil. International Journal of Primatology, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1172-1197. FORERO-MEDINA, G.; VIEIRA, M.V. 2007. Conectividade funcional e a importância da interação organismo-paisagem. Oecologia Brasiliensis, Rio de Janeiro, v. 11, n. 4, p. 493-502, 2007. FRAGASZY, D.M.; VISALBERGHI, E.; FEDIGAN, L.M. 2004. The Complete Capuchin: The Biology of the Genus Cebus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 337p. FRANCESCO FICETOLA, G. & DENOËL, M. 2009. Ecological thresholds: an assessment of methods to identify abrupt changes in species–habitat relationships. Ecography, 32, 1075–1084. FRANKLIN, I.R., 1980. Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Soulé, M.E., Wilcox, B.A. (Eds.), Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary- Ecological Perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 135–150. FRANKLIN, J. 2010. Mapping Species Distribution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 338p. GALINDO-LEAL, C.; CÂMARA, I.G. 2005. Status do hotspot Mata Atlântica: uma síntese. In: GALINDO-LEAL, C.; CÂMARA, I.G (eds.) Mata Atlântica: Biodiversidade, Ameaças e Perspectivas. Belo Horizonte: Conservação Internacional. p.3-11. GARCIA, M. CABEZA, C. RAHBEK & M. B. ARAÚJO. 2014. Multiple Dimensions of Climate Change and Their Implications for Biodiversity. Science 344:1247579. 85 GASCON, C.; LOVEJOY, T. E. 1998. Ecological impacts of forest fragmentation in central Amazonia. Zoology-Analysis of Complex Systems 101:273-280. GIBSON L, LEE TM, KOH LP, ET AL. 2011. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478:378-383. GONÇALVES, E.C.; FERRARI, S.F.; SILVA, A.; COUTINHO, P.G.E.; MENEZES, E.V.; SCHNEIDER, P.C. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic variability of silvery marmosets, Mico argentatus. In: Marsh LK, editor. Primates in fragments: Ecology and conservation. New York: Kluwer Academics/Plenum Press. pp. 17 - 28. GONZÁLEZ-SOLÍS et al. 2001. Population density of primates in a large fragment of the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest. Biodiversity and Conservation 10, p. 1267–1282. GRAHAM, T.; MATTHEWS, H.D.; TURNER, S. 2016. A global-scale evaluation of primate exposure and vulnerability to climate change. International Journal of Primatology. 37(2), 158–174. https://10.1007/s10764-016-9890-4 HANSEN, M. C.; POTAPOV, P. V.; MOORE, R.; HANCHER, M.; TURUBANOVA, S. A.; TYUKAVINA, A.; THAU, D.; STEHMAN, S. V.; GOETZ, S. J.; LOVELAND, T. R.; KOMMAREDDY, A.; EGOROV, A.; CHINI, L.; JUSTICE, C. O. & TOWNSHEND, J. R. G. 2013. High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science. Vol 342, Issue 6160, pp. 850 – 853. doi: 10.1126/science.1244693 HANSKI, I. & MOILANEN, A. 1996. Minimum viable metapopulation size. American Naturalist, 147, 527–541. HARCOURT, A. H.; COPPETO, S. A.; PARKS, S. A. 2002. Rarity, specialization and extinction in primates. Journal of Biogeography, v. 29, p. 445-456. HARTLEY, S.; KRUSHELNYCKY, P. D. & LESTER, P. J. 2010. Integrating physiology, population dynamics and climate to make multi-scale predictions for the spread of an invasive insect: the Argentine ant at Haleakala National Park, Hawaii. Ecography 33:83-94. HERNANDEZ, P. A.; GRAHAM, C. H.; MASTER, L. L.; ALBERT, D. L. 2006. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography, 29, 773-785. HOBBS, R.J.; YATES, C.J. 2003. Impacts of ecosystem fragmentation on plant populations: generalising the idiosyncratic. Australian Journal of Botany 51, p. 471–488. HOF, C., LEVINSKY, I., ARAÚJO, M.B., RAHBEK, C. 2011. Rethinking species’ ability to cope with rapid climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2987–2990. HOLLAND, J.D., BERT, D.G., FAHRIG, L. 2004. Determining the spatial scale of species’ response to habitat. Bioscience 54, 227. HONGYU, K. 2015. Comparação do GGE-biplot ponderado e AMMI-ponderado com outros modelos de interação genótipo × ambiente. 155p. Tese (Doutorado em Estatística e Experimentação Agronômica) - Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, 2015.HOOIJBERG, R., QUINN, R.E. 1992. Behavioral complexity and the development of effective managers, in: Phillips, R.L., Hunt, J.G. (Eds.), Strategic Management: A Multiorganizational-Level Perspective. Quorum, New York. 86 HOOPER, D.U.; CHAPIN, F.S.; EWEL, J.J.; HECTOR, A.; INCHAUSTI, P.; LAVOREL, S.; LAWTON, J.H.; LODGE, D.M.; LOREAU, M.; NAEEM, S.; SCHMID, B.; SETALA, H.; SYMSTAD, A.J.; VANDERMEER, J.; WARDLE, D.A. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75, 3–35. IBAMA – Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis. 2010. In: CAMPANILI, M.; SCHAFFER; W.B. (orgs.) Mata Atlântica: patrimônio nacional dos brasileiros / Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas. Núcleo Mata Atlântica e Pampa;. – Brasília: MMA, 408 p., Biodiversidade 34. IONIA, 2009. Globcover Land Cover, See http://ionia1.esrin.esa.int. IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Geneva: IPCC, 151p. IUCN. 2015. International Union for Conservation of Nature. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Disponível em <http://www.iucnredlist.org>. Acesso em: 22/05/2018. JACKSON, H.B.; FAHRIG, L. 2012. What size is a biologically relevant landscape? Landsc. Ecol. 27, 929–941. JEROZOLIMSKI, A.; PERES, C. 2003. Bringing back the biggest bacon: a cross-site analysis of the structure of hunter-kill profiles in Neotropical forests. Biological Conservation v.111, p.415-425. JOHNS, A. D., & J. P. SKORUPA. 1987. Responses of rain-forest primates to habitat disturbance - a review. International Journal of Primatology 8:157-191. KASS, J.M., PINILLA-BUITRAGO G.E., VILELA B., AEILLO-LAMMENS M.E., MUSCARELLA R., MEROW C., and ANDERSON R.P. 2018. Wallace: A flexible platform for reproducible modeling of species niches and distributions built for community expansion. Methods Ecol Evol. p.1-6. KEESEN, F.; SILVA, A.C.; ARASHIRO, E.; PINHEIRO, C.F.S. 2017. Simulations of populations of Sapajus robustus in a fragmented landscape. Ecological Modelling, v. 344, p. 38-47. KIERULFF, M.C.M. et al. 2004. The use of camera-traps in a survey of the buff-headed capuchin monkey, Cebus xanthosternos. Neotropical Primates, v.12, n.2, p.56-59. KIERULFF, M.C.M.; MENDES, S.L.; RYLANDS, A. B. 2015. Sapajus xanthosternos. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Disponível em <www.iucnredlist.org>. Acesso em: 16/05/2019. KING, A.W.; WITH, K.A. 2002. Dispersal success on spatially structured landscapes: When do spatial pattern and dispersal behavior really matter? Ecological Modelling, 147, 23 39. KUPFER, J.A.; MALANSON, G.P. AND FRANKLIN S.B. 2006. Not seeing the ocean for the islands: the mediating influence of matrix-based processes on forest fragmentation effects. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15, 8-20. LAGOS, A.R.; MULLER B. L. A. 2007. Hotspot brasileiro Mata Atlântica. Saúde & ambiente em Revista, Duque de Caxias, v.2, n.2, p.35-45. 87 LANDE, R. 1987. Extinction thresholds in demographic models of territorial populations. American Naturalist, 130, 624–635. LAURANCE, W. F.; YENSEN, E. 1991. Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. Biological Conservation, Boston, v. 55, p. 77-92. LAURANCE, W.F. 1991. Edge Effects in Tropical Forest Fragments: Application of a Model for the Design of Nature Reserves. Biological Conservation 57:205 - 219. LAURANCE, W.F.; CAMARGO, J. L.C.; LUIZÃO, R.C.C; LAURANCE, S. G.; PIMMD, S. L.; BRUNA, E.M.; STOUFFER, P.C.; WILLIAMSON, G.B.; BENÍTEZ-MALVIDO, J.; VASCONCELOS, H. L.; VAN HOUTAN, K.S.; ZARTMAN, C.E.; BOYLE, S.A.; DIDHAMM, R.K.; ANDRADE, A.; LOVEJOY, T.E. 2011. The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: A 32-year investigation. Biological Conservation, 144, 56–67. LEAL, I. R.; SILVA, J.D.; TABARELLI, M.; LACHER, T.E. 2005. Mudando o curso da conservação da biodiversidade na Caatinga do Nordeste do Brasil. Megadiversidade, v. 1, n. 1, p. 139-146. LERNOULD, J.M.; KIERULFF, M.C.M.; CANALE, G. 2012. Yellow-breasted capuchin Cebus xanthosternos: support by zoos for its conservation – a sucess story. Internacional Zoo Yearbook, 46 (1), 71-79. LI, B.; JIA, Z.; PAN, R.; REN, B. 2003. Changes in distribution of the snub-nosed monkey in China. In: Marsh LK, editor. Primates in fragments: Ecology and conservation. New York: Kluwer Academics/Plenum Press. pp. 29 - 52. LIMA, G.S.; RIBEIRO, G.A.; GONÇALVES, W. 2005. Avaliação da efetividade de manejo das unidades de conservação de proteção integral em Minas Gerais. Revista Árvore, 29 (4): 647-653. LINDENMAYER, D. B.; FISCHER. J. 2006. Habitat Fragmentation and Landscape Change: An ecological and conservation synthesis. Washington: Island Press. LOYOLA, R.D., C. G. BECKER, U. KUBOTA, C. F. B. HADDAD, C. R. FONSECA & T. M. LEWINSOHN. 2008. Hung out to dry: choice of priority ecoregions for conserving threatened Neotropical anurans depend on their life-history traits. PLoS ONE 3: e2120. LUDWIG, G.; AGUIAR, L.M.; ROCHA, V.J. 2006. Comportamento de obtenção de Manihot esculenta Crantz (Euphorbiaceae), mandioca, por Cebus nigritus (Goldfuss) (Primates, Cebidae) como uma adaptação alimentar em períodos de escassez. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 23(3):888-890. MALCOLM, J. R. 1995. Forest structure and the abundance and diversity of Neotropical small mammals. Pages 624 in M. D. Lowman and N. M. Nadkarni, editors. Forest Canopies. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA. MANTYKA-PRINGLE, C.S., MARTIN, T.G., RHODES, J.R. 2011. Interactions between climate and habitat loss effects on biodiversity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 1239–1252. MARIMON, B.S.; MARIMON-JUNIOR, B.H.; FELDPAUSCH, T.R., OLIVEIRA-SANTOS, C.; MEWS, H. A.; LOPEZ-GONZALEZ, G.; LLOYD, J.; FRANCZAK, D. D.; DE OLIVEIRA, E.A.; MARACAHIPES, L.; MIGUEL, A.; LENZA, E.; PHILLIPS, O.L. 2014. Disequilibrium and hyperdynamic tree turnover at the forest-cerrado transition zone in southern Amazonia. Plant Ecology and Diversity, 7(1–2), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2013.818072 88 MARSH, L.K. 2003. Section I: Genetic and population dynamics. In: Marsh, L.K. (ed.) Primates in Fragments: Ecology and Conservation. New York: Kluer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 428p, p.11-16. MARSH, L.K.; CHAPMAN, C. (Ed.). 2013. Primates in Fragments: Complexity and Resilience. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. 559 p. MARTINELLI, F.S. 2014. Fragmentação florestal, perda de habitat e ocorrência de primatas na Mata Atlântica. Dissertação (Mestrado em Biologia Animal) – Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Centro de Ciências Humanas e Naturais. 60p. MATSUSHITA, B.; XU, M.; FUKUSHIMA, T. 2006.Characterizing the changes in landscape structure in the Lake Kasumigaura, Japan using a high-quality GIS dataset. Ladscape and Urban Planning, v.78, p.241-250. MATTHIES, D. et al. 2004. Population size and the risk of extinction: empirical evidence from rare plant. Oikos 105, p. 481–488. MCBRIDE, S. D.; CUDDEFORD, D. 2001. The putative welfare reducing effects of preventing equine stereotypic behaviour. Anim. Welf. 10(2), 173 189. MCGARIGAL, K.; MARKS, B.J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure (version 2.0). Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 122 p. MENDOZA, M. E.; GRANADOS, E. L.; GENELETTI, D.; PÉREZ-SALICRUP, D. R.; SALINAS, V. 2011. Analysing land cover and land use change process at watershed level: A multitemporal study in the Lake Cuitzeo Watershed, Mexico (1975-2003). Applied Geography, v.31, p.237-350. METZGER, J.P. 1999. Estrutura da paisagem e fragmentação: análise bibliográfica. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Rio de Janeiro, v.71, n.3, p.445-463, 1999. METZGER, J.P. 2001. O que é ecologia de paisagens?. Biota Neotropica, 28(11): 1-9. MIGUET, P.; JACKSON, H.B.; JACKSON, N.D.; MARTIN, A.E.; FAHRIG, L. 2015. What determines the spatial extent of landscape effects on species? Landsc. Ecol., 1–18, MITANI, J.C.; RODMAN, P.S. 1979. Territoriality: the relation of ranging pattern and home range size to defensibility, with an analysis of territoriality among primate species. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 5, 241–251 MMA. 2004. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Áreas prioritárias para a conservação, utilização sustentável e repartição de benefícios da biodiversidade brasileira. Portaria N° 126 de 27 de Maio de 2004. Available at: http://www.mma.gov.br/estruturas/chm/_arquivos/port126.pdf. Accessed on March 26th 2022. MMA. 2007. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Áreas Prioritárias para conservação, uso sustentável e repartição de benefícios da biodiversidade brasileira. Atualização. Portaria MMA n° 9, de 23 de janeiro de 2007. Available at: http://www.mma.gov.br/estruturas/chm/_arquivos/biodiversidade31.pdf. Accessed on March 26th 2022. 89 MMA. 2016. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Áreas Prioritárias para conservação, uso sustentável e repartição de benefícios da biodiversidade brasileira. Segunda Atualização. Portaria MMA n° 223, de 21 de junho de 2016. Available at: http://www.mma.gov.br/images/arquivo/80049/Areas%20Prioritarias/Caatinga/BIOMA %20CAATINGA.pdf. Accessed on March 26th 2022. MÜLLER, M. W.; VALLE, R. R. Ecofisiologia do cultivo do cacaueiro. (2012). In: VALLE, R.R, Ciência, tecnologia e manejo do cacaueiro. Brasília: CEPLAC/CEPEC, p.31-66. MYERS, N. et al. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, v.403, p.853-858. NEWMAN, M.E.J. 2006. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 103(23), 17. NORI, J.; URBINA-CARDONA, J. N.; LOYOLA, R. D.; LESCANO, J. N. & LEYNAUD, G. C. 2011. Climate Change and American Bullfrog Invasion: What Could We Expect in South America? PLoS ONE 6:e25718. NOWAK, K; LEE, P.C. 2013. “Specialist” Primates Can Be Flexible in Response to Habitat Alteration. In: MARSH, L. K.; CHAPMAN, C. A. (Ed.). Primates in fragments: complexity and resilience. New York: Springer. p. 199-211. OLIVEIRA, C.G.L.; MIRANDA, J.G.V.; JAPYASSÚ, H.F.; EL-HANI, C.N. 2017. Using Zipf-Mandelbrot law and graph theory to evaluate animal welfare. Physica A. 492, 285-295. OLIVEIRA, D. G.; PRATA, A. P. N.; SOUTO, L. S.; FERREIRA, R. A. 2013. Does the edge effect influence plant community structure in a tropical dry forest? Revista Árvore, v. 37, n. 2, p. 311-320, 2013. OLIVER, W.L.R.; SANTOS, I.B. 1991. Threatened endemic mammals of the Atlantic forest region of south-east Brazil. Wildl. Preserv. Trust. Special Scientific report, 4, 1-126. OPPENHEIMER, M.; CAMPOS, M. & WARREN, R. (CLAs) et al. 2014. "Emergent Risks and Key Vulnerabilities". In: IPCC. Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. PARDINI, R.; DE SOUZA, S.M.; BRAGA-NETO, R.; METZGER, J.P. 2005. The role of forest structure, fragment size and corridors in maintaining small mammal abundance and diversity in an Atlantic forest landscape. Biological Conservation, 124, 253-266. PARMESAN, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 637–669. PERES, C.A. 2000. Effects of subsistence hunting on vertebrate community structure in Amazonian Forests. Conserv. Biol. 14:240-253 PHILLIPS, S. J. & DUDÍK, M. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography, 31, 161-175. PHILLIPS, S.J., R.P. ANDERSON & R.E. SCHAPIRE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions.Ecological Modelling v. 190 p. 231 -259. PINTO, L. P.; BEDÊ, L.; PAESE, A.; FONSECA, M.; PAGLIA, A.; LAMAS, I. 2006. Mata Atlântica Brasileira: os desafios para conservação da biodiversidade de um hotspot mundial. In: 90 ROCHA, C. F. D.; BERGALLO, H. G.; SLUYS, M. V.; ALVES, M. A. S. (Eds.). Biologia da Conservação: essências. São Carlos: RiMa. p. 91-118. PIROVANI, D.B.; SILVA, A.G.; DOS SANTOS, A.R.; CECÍLIO, R.A.; GLERIANI, J.M.; MARTINS, S.V. 2014. Análise espacial de fragmentos florestais na bacia do rio Itapemirim, ES. Revista Árvore, 38(2): 271-281. PRINTES, R.C. 1999. The Lami Biological Reserve, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, and the danger of power lines to howlers in urban reserves. Neotropical Primates, v. 7, n. 4, p. 135-136. PRINTES, R.C.; RYLANDS, A.B.; BICCA-MARQUES, J.C. 2011. Distribution and status of the Critically Endangered blond titi monkey Callicebus barbarabrownae of northeast Brazil. Oryx, v. 45, n. 3, p. 439-443, 2011. RATTIS, L.; DOBROVOLSKI, R.; TALEBI, M.; LOYOLA, R. 2018. Geographic range-scale assessment of species conservation status: A framework linking species and landscape features. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation. 16 (2), 97-104. REDDING, T.E.; HOPE, G.D.; FORTIN, M.J.; SCHMIDT, M.G. & BAILEY, W.G. 2003. Spatial patterns of soil temperature and moisture across subalpine forest-clearcut edges in the southern interior of British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 83: 121-130 REGAZZI, A.J. 2000. Análise multivariada, notas de aula INF 766, Departamento de Informática da Universidade Federal de Viçosa, v.2. RELYEA, R. A. 2003. Predators come and predators go: the reversibility of predator-induced traits. Ecology, 84 (7), pp. 1840-1848. REN, B.; LI, M.; LONG, Y.; WEI, F. 2009. Influence of day length, ambient temperature, and seasonality on daily travel distance in the Yunnan snub-nosed monkey at Jinsichang, Yunnan, China. Am. J. Primatol. 71, 233–241 RIBEIRO, M.C.; METZGER, J.P.; MARTENSEN, A.C.; PONZONI, F.; HIROTA, M.M. 2009. Brazilian Atlantic forest: how much is left and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, v. 142, p. 1141- 1153. ROCHA, V.J. 2000. Macaco-prego, como controlar esta nova praga florestal? Floresta. Curitiba, 30(1-2):95-99. ROOT, T.L., J.T. PRICE, K.R. HALL, S.H. SCHNEIDER, C. ROSENZWEIG & J.A. POUNDS. 2003. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421: 57-60. RYLANDS, A. 2003. Official List of Brazilian Fauna Threatened with Extinction - 2003. Neotropical Primates, v.11, n.1, p. 43-49. SALA, O.E., III, F.S.C., ARMESTO, J.J., BERLOW, E., BLOOMFIELD, J., DIRZO, R., HUBER-SANWALD, E., HUENNEKE, L.F., JACKSON, R.B., KINZIG, A., LEEMANS, R., LODGE, D.M., MOONEY, H.A., POFF, N.L., SYKES, M.T., WALKER, B.H., WALKER, M. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287, 1770–1774. SALAZAR, L.F., NOBRE, C.A., OYAMA, M.D. 2007. Climate change consequences on the biome distribution in tropical South America. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, 1–6. 91 SALES, L.P., GALLETI, M.; PIRES, M.M. 2020. Climate and land-use change will lead to a faunal ‘savannization’ on tropical rainforests. Global Change Biology, 00: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15374 SANTOS, A.C.A. 2013. Padrão de forrageamento de Cebus flavius (Schreber 1774) (Primates: Cebidae), em fragmento de Mata Atlântica na Paraíba. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ecologia e Conservação) – Universidade Federal de Sergipe. São Cristóvão, 77p. SANTOS, A.M.M.; SANTOS, B.A. 2008. Are the vegetation structure and composition of the shrubby Caatinga free from edge influence? Acta Botânica Brasileira, v. 22, n. 4, p. 1077-1084. SCHMIDLIN, L.A.J. 2004. Análise da disponibilidade de habitat para o mico-leão-da-cara-preta (Leontopithecus caissara Lorini & Persson, 1990) e identificação de áreas preferenciais para o manejo da espécie por técnicas de geoprocessamento. Dissertação (Mestrado em Manejo Florestal). Universidade Federal do Paraná. 90p. SETZ, E.Z.F. 1991. Métodos de quantificação de comportamento de Primatas em estudos de campo. A Primatologia no Brasil. V.3, p.411 435. SILVA, F.A.; CANALE, G.R.; KIERULFF, M.C.M.; DUARTE, G.T.; PAGLIA, A.P.; BERNARDO, C.S. 2016. Hunting, pet trade, and forest size effects on population viability of a critically endangered neotropical primate, Sapajus xanthosternos (Wied-Neuwied, 1826). American Journal of Primatology, v. 78, n. 9, p. 950-960. SILVA, L.G.; RIBEIRO, M.C.; HASUI, É.; DA COSTA, C.A.; CUNHA, R.G.T. 2015. Patch size, functional isolation, visibility and matrix permeability influences neotropical primate occurrence within highly fragmented landscapes. PloS One, v. 10, n. 2, p. 1-20. SKORUPA, J. P. 1986. Responses of rainforest primates to selective logging in Kibale Forest, Uganda: a summary report. Pages 57-70 in K. Benirschke, editor. Primates: The Road to Self-Sustaining Populations. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA. SOUZA-ALVES, J.P. 2010. Ecologia alimentar de Callicebus coimbrai Kobayashi & Langguth, 1999 no Sul de Sergipe, Brasil: definindo parâmetros para o desenvolvimento de estratégias de conservação e manejo. São Cristóvão, SE: Universidade Federal de Sergipe, (UFS). Dissertação de Mestrado. STEVENSON, P.R.; CASTELLANOS, M.C. 2000. Feeding rates and daily path range of the colombian woolly monkeys as evidence for between- and within-group competition. Folia Primatol. 71, 399–408 SUSCKE, P.; PRESOTTO, A.; IZAR, P. 2021. The role of hunting on Sapajus xanthosternos’ landscape of fear in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. American Journal of Primatology, 83(5). doi:10.1002/ajp.23243 TABARELLI, M.; GASCON, C. 2005. Lessons from fragmentation research: improving management and policy guidelines for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, v. 19, n. 3, p. 734-739. TABARELLI, M.; SILVA, J.M.C.; GASCON, C. 2004. Forest fragmentation, synergisms and the impoverishment of neotropical forests. Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 13, p. 1419-1425. 92 THORNTON, D.H.; BRANCH, L.C.; SUNQUIST, M.E. 2011. The relative influence of habitat loss and fragmentation: Do tropical mammals meet the temperate paradigm? Ecological Applications, v. 21, n. 6, p. 2324-2333. THUILLER W.; RICHARDSON D.M; KPYSEK P.; MIDGLEY G.F.; HUGHES, G.O.; ROUGET M. 2005. Niche-based modeling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Global Change Biology, v. 11, n. 12, p. 2234–2250. TISCHENDORF, L.; BENDER, D. J.; FAHRIG, L. 2003. Evaluation of patch isolation metrics in mosaic landscapes for specialist vs. generalist dispersers. Landscape Ecology 18:41-50. TSCHARNTKE T, TYLIANAKIS JM, RAND TA, ET AL. 2012. Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes – eight hypotheses. Biological Reviews 87:661–685. TURNER, I.M. 1996. Species loss in fragments of tropical rainforest: a review of the evidence. Journal of Applied Ecology 33:200 - 209. VIDOLIN, G. P.; BIONDI, D.; WANDEMBRUCK, A. 2011. Análise da estrutura da paisagem de um remanescente de floresta com Araucária, Paraná, Brasil. Revista Árvore, 35(3): 515-525. VIEIRA, M.V. et al. 2003. Mamíferos.In: RAMBALDI, D.M.; OLIVEIRA, D.A.S. (org.) Fragmentação de Ecossistemas: Causas e Efeitos Sobre a Biodiversidade e Recomendações de Políticas Públicas. Brasília: MMA/CNPq, 510 p., p.125-151 VOS, C.C.; VERBOOM, J.; OPDAM, P.F.; TER BRAAK, C.J. 2001. Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. Am. Nat. 157, 24–41 WALTHER, G.R., E. POST, P. CONVEY, A. MENZEL, C. PARMESAN, T.J.C. BEEBEE, J.M. FROMENTIN, O. HOEGH-GULDBERG & F. BAIRLEIN. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416: 389-395. WITH, K. A. & KING, A. W. 1999. Extinction Thresholds for Species in Fractal Landscapes. Conservation Biology, 13, 314–326. YAHNER, R. H. & MAHAN, C. G. 1997. Behavioral Considerations in Fragmented Landscapes. Conservation Biology, 11, 569–570. ZANONI, M.M.; FERREIRA, A.D.D.; MIGUEL, L.A.; FLORIANI, D.; CANALI, N. RAYNAUT, C. 2000. Preservação da natureza e desenvolvimento rural: dilemas e estratégias dos agricultores familiares em Áreas de Proteção Ambiental. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, n.2. 39-55.pt_BR
dc.type.degreeDoutoradopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Tese (Pós-Ecologia)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
TESE_Danilo_Versão Final.pdf3,41 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.