Ambiguidades e conflitos na implementação do Programa Institucional de Bolsa de Iniciação à Docência (PIBID/UFBA) entre 2009/2015

Abstract

The general objective of this dissertation is to analyze the implementation of the Initiation of Teaching Scholarship’s Institutional Program (PIBID) of the Federal University of Bahia (UFBA) between the 2009/2015 period. In these terms, this work seeks answers to the following questions: How did the implementation of the PIBID/UFBA happen between 2009/2015? Which order of factors impacted in a incisive manner in this process? How was the institutional design of the policy affected in the implementation process? The empirical research was conducted through the analysis of reports made by the scholarship holders of initiation of teaching, made from the activities done in the context of state and municipal schools of the city of Salvador. It also examined the laws, norms, ordinances, notices related to the program. The methodology used is founded in qualitative research on the basis of case studies, and in documentary research, whose technique of systematization of data used Content Analysis. From the point of view of theoretical grounds, the study had a dialogue with the model of ambiguity and conflicts in the process of public policy implementation, formulated by Matland (1995), which has as objective to establish a synthesis between diverse models from two more comprehensive fields of study, the top down and bottom up approach. As main findings, it is highlighted that the implementation of the program was marked by high levels of ambiguities in consequence of the difficulties in access to the operationalization means in the implementation space. In this regard, the implementation came closer to the characteristics of the kind of implementation, administrative and experimental. The work highlighted also the key role of the supervisors in the resolution of the difficulties together with the scholarship holders, as well as the importance of the involvement of the beneficiaries of the policy in relation to the achievement of goals, since the agents of implementations share responsibilities in relation to the results.