Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/32475
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Bruno Carreiro da-
dc.contributor.authorSant'Anna, Cláudio Nogueira-
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Neylor-
dc.contributor.authorChavez, Christina Von Flach Garcia-
dc.creatorSilva, Bruno Carreiro da-
dc.creatorSant'Anna, Cláudio Nogueira-
dc.creatorRocha, Neylor-
dc.creatorChavez, Christina Von Flach Garcia-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-10T19:13:51Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-10T19:13:51Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-
dc.identifier.citationSilva, Bruno [et al.]. The effect of automatic concern mapping strategies on conceptual cohesion measurement. Information and Software Technology, Canadá, vol. 75, p. 56–70, jul., 2016, doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2016.03.006. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0950584916300520#!. Acesso em: jan. 2016.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0950-5849-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/32475-
dc.description.abstractContext: Cohesion has been recognized as an important quality attribute of software design across decades. It can be defined as the degree to which a module is focused on a single concern of software. A concern is any concept, feature, requirement or property of the problem or solution domain. Conceptual cohesion is an alternative way of cohesion measurement based on what concerns each module addresses. Therefore, adopting a strategy to map concerns to source code elements is challenging but necessary. Objective: We aim at providing empirical evidence about whether automatic concern mapping strategies are already ready to be used effectively for conceptual cohesion measurement. Method: We carried out an empirical study to assess the ability of conceptual cohesion measurement using different automatic concern mapping strategies in selecting the least cohesive modules. Results: Conceptual cohesion measurements over the two analyzed mapping strategies performed weakly in the ability of selecting the least cohesive modules. We then provide a discussion to explain the reasons. Conclusion: Concern mapping strategies should be carefully chosen for conceptual cohesion measure- ment, specially if automatic mapping is under consideration. Manual mapping is still the most reliable way for computing conceptual cohesion. We pointed out limitations in automatic mapping strategies that go beyond conceptual cohesion measurement purposes and which should be considered in future research or applications in industry.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevierpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.sourcehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584916300520pt_BR
dc.subjectModule cohesionpt_BR
dc.subjectCohesion metricspt_BR
dc.subjectConcern mappingpt_BR
dc.subjectComparative empirical studypt_BR
dc.titleThe effect of automatic concern mapping strategies on conceptual cohesion measurementpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.description.localpubAlberta, Canadápt_BR
dc.identifier.numberv. 75pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo Publicado em Periódico (PGCOMP)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
preprint_IST_2016_The_Effect_of_Automatic_Concern_Mapping_Strategies.pdf_7789,22 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.