Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/16543
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Pedro Luís Bernardo da-
dc.contributor.authorViana, Blandina Felipe-
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Márcio Zikán-
dc.contributor.authorMelo, Amada Mariana Costa de-
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Misonete Gueidneli Cavalcanti-
dc.contributor.authorVasconcelos, Rodrigo Nogueira de-
dc.contributor.authorDantas, Tatiana Bichara-
dc.creatorRocha, Pedro Luís Bernardo da-
dc.creatorViana, Blandina Felipe-
dc.creatorCardoso, Márcio Zikán-
dc.creatorMelo, Amada Mariana Costa de-
dc.creatorCosta, Misonete Gueidneli Cavalcanti-
dc.creatorVasconcelos, Rodrigo Nogueira de-
dc.creatorDantas, Tatiana Bichara-
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-11T17:48:47Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn1007-662X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/16543-
dc.descriptionTexto completo: acesso restrito. p. 263-272pt_BR
dc.description.abstractEucalyptus plantations are increasing in Brazil, frequently replacing pastures, but there is still scarce information about its capacity to maintain the fauna of neighbor forest remnants. In this study, we compared descriptors of the communities of leaf litter organisms (lizards, anurans, myriapods, arachnids, orthopterans, coleopterans, and ants) between a large remnant of primary Atlantic Forest and an adjacent eucalyptus monoculture (phase 1). Then, we compared the same descriptors for leaf litter lizards and anurans, Euglossini bees, and frugivorous butterflies among the largest remnant, small remnants at intermediate regeneration stage, and eucalyptus monocultures that were not adjacent to the largest remnant (phase 2). Monocultures were sampled immediately before logging. In phase 1, we detected significant differences in structure between the forest and the monoculture in six out of seven communities sampled. Ca. 81% of the species of the landscape were recorded in the forest, but only 54% of these were found also in the monoculture. In phase 2, the structure of two out of four forest communities was significantly different from the structure of small remnants and monocultures. On average, 76% of the species found in the whole landscape were sampled in the forest. Out of this subset, on average 74% of the species were also sampled in small remnants and 68% in monocultures. Findings of the present study point out a moderate capacity of eucalyptus monocultures to harbor species of the forest fauna even when fully grown but highlights the opportunity that they might offer for increasing connectivity in anthropogenic forest landscapes depending on their management.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.sourcehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11676-012-0311-zpt_BR
dc.subjectAtlantic forestpt_BR
dc.subjectMonoculturept_BR
dc.subjectBiodiversitypt_BR
dc.titleWhat is the value of eucalyptus monocultures for the biodiversity of the Atlantic forest? A multitaxa study in southern Bahia, Brazilpt_BR
dc.title.alternativeJournal of Forestry Researchpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.numberv. 24, n. 2pt_BR
dc.embargo.liftdate10000-01-01-
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo Publicado em Periódico (Biologia)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Pedro Luís Bernardo da Rocha.pdf588,93 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.