Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/14837
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMantelatto, Marcelo C.-
dc.contributor.authorFleury, Beatriz G.-
dc.contributor.authorMenegola, Carla-
dc.contributor.authorCreed, Joel C.-
dc.creatorMantelatto, Marcelo C.-
dc.creatorFleury, Beatriz G.-
dc.creatorMenegola, Carla-
dc.creatorCreed, Joel C.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-22T18:32:08Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn0022-0981-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/14837-
dc.descriptionTexto completo: acesso restrito. p. 129–134pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBiological invasions need to be efficiently monitored in order to detect change in invader abundance and the modification of receptor communities so that management options can be effectively applied. We compared four methods, visual census (VC), photo-quadrats of 50 × 50 cm (PHOT50), mosaic of photo-quadrats of 25 × 25 cm (PHOTS25) and video-quadrats (VIDEO), to determine 1) the percent cover of the most abundant taxa in reef communities undergoing invasion by the corals Tubastraea coccinea and Tubastraea tagusensis and 2) direct counts of the invasive species for density estimates per unit area. The study was carried out on eight islands in the Tamoios Ecological Station Marine Protected Area, Ilha Grande Bay, Brazil. The digital methods did not differentiate some T. coccinea from T. tagusensis and both Tubastraea densities were higher in the VC method, followed by PHOTS25, PHOT50 and VIDEO. An ANOSIM indicated differences among sampled communities but not between the methodologies. The richness, diversity and evenness indices did not differ significantly between the methods for the different benthic communities investigated. In the field, the VC was slower and PHOT50 was faster; however, in the laboratory VC was faster and PHOTS25 was slower. Overall the VC method was quickest, followed by PHOT50, VIDEO and PHOTS25. The overall cost was highest in PHOTS25 method, followed by the VC, VIDEO and PHOT50. VC had the best cost-to-benefit ratio and digital methods were not reliable for estimating the densities of corals.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.sourcehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2013.09.009pt_BR
dc.subjectBenthospt_BR
dc.subjectCoralpt_BR
dc.subjectInvasive speciespt_BR
dc.subjectSampling techniquespt_BR
dc.subjectTubastraea spppt_BR
dc.titleCost–benefit of different methods for monitoring invasive corals on tropical rocky reefs in the southwest Atlanticpt_BR
dc.title.alternativeJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecologypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.numberv. 449pt_BR
dc.embargo.liftdate10000-01-01-
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo Publicado em Periódico (Biologia)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
1-s2.0-S0022098113003286-main.pdf412,97 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.