Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/14039
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Wilson Araújo-
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Gisele Olímpio da-
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Pedro Afonso de Paula-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Fábio Santos de-
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Luiz Souza-
dc.contributor.authorBahia, Nei de Carvalho-
dc.contributor.authorConceição, Liliane dos S.-
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Jailson Bittencourt de-
dc.creatorLopes, Wilson Araújo-
dc.creatorRocha, Gisele Olímpio da-
dc.creatorPereira, Pedro Afonso de Paula-
dc.creatorOliveira, Fábio Santos de-
dc.creatorCarvalho, Luiz Souza-
dc.creatorBahia, Nei de Carvalho-
dc.creatorConceição, Liliane dos S.-
dc.creatorAndrade, Jailson Bittencourt de-
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-05T13:40:19Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.issn1615-9306-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/14039-
dc.descriptionTexto complete: acesso restrito. p. 1787-1796pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes the development and optimization, by using multivariate analysis, of a GC–MS-SIM method for evaluation of the 16 polyaromatic hydrocarbons considered as priority pollutants in atmospheric particulate material by the US EPA. In order to assure an adequate separation in the shortest analysis time, a multivariate design was used to set the conditions of the oven temperature program. The optimization process was carried out using factorial fractional design and Box–Behnken design. The following factors were evaluated: initial temperature, temperature rate #1, intermediary temperature, temperature rate #2, and final temperature. The optimized conditions were set at: 70°C (2 min) → 200°C (30°C/min, 5 min) → 300°C (5°C/min, 1.67 min). Moreover, we have also optimized the injector temperature as 310°C and sampling time as 0.8 min. The total analysis time was 33 min. Validation of GC–MS-SIM yielded satisfactory results for repetitivity of the detector response and retention times, and linearity of calibration curves. LOD were established as 0.13–0.34 ng/mL (peak area) and 0.18–0.72 ng/mL (peak height). The method has been shown to be appropriate for the analysis of samples of atmospheric particulate material and/or other environmental matrices.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.sourcehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700573pt_BR
dc.subjectAtmospheric aerosolspt_BR
dc.subjectGC–MSpt_BR
dc.subjectMultivariate designpt_BR
dc.subjectPAHspt_BR
dc.titleMultivariate optimization of a GC–MS method for determination of sixteen priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental samplespt_BR
dc.title.alternativeJournal of Separation Sciencept_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.numberv. 31, n. 10pt_BR
dc.embargo.liftdate10000-01-01-
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo Publicado em Periódico (Química)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
10.1002jssc.200700573.pdf2,06 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.