Resumo:
Trypanosoma vivax is a hemoprotozoan responsible for trypanosomiasis in cattle, a disease that
causes productive and reproductive losses, resulting in economic damage in Brazil. There are
few reports of the disease in Bahia, despite frequent outbreaks, possibly due to diagnostic
limitations, as clinical diagnosis is nonspecific, making it essential to associate it with
laboratory testing. The Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay (IFA) requires the separation of
parasites from blood cells in a laborious and costly purification process, which is the main
limitation of the technique. Furthermore, the absence of T. vivax in vitro culture necessitates
the use of animals for antigen production. This study aimed to standardize and validate IFA for
the detection of anti-T. vivax antibodies using blood smears from sheep experimentally infected
with T. vivax. Immunosuppression protocols and clinical and hematological alterations were
described to support future research on antigen production. For this purpose, six adult sheep
were intravenously infected with T. vivax trypomastigotes (Ipameri-GO strain, isolated from
cattle) following different immunosuppression protocols. Once the animals reached peak
parasitemia, blood samples were collected in tubes containing EDTA, heparin, and sodium
citrate. Subsequently, thick blood smears were prepared and fixed with either acetone or
methanol. For comparison, antigen purification using Percoll at different centrifugation speeds
was performed, and recovered parasites were quantified using Brener’s method. To validate the
technique, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value
(NPV), and accuracy were calculated using bovine serum samples with known positive and
negative status. Additionally, the serological status of 49 bovine samples from farms
experiencing disease outbreaks was investigated. Cross-reactivity of IFA with other
hemoparasites was also assessed. The best protocol involved blood smears from sodium citrate treated samples fixed with acetone. The technique demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.48%,
specificity of 96.87%, and accuracy of 93.67%, with no cross-reactions observed with Babesia
bovis, Babesia bigemina, Anaplasma marginale, Neospora caninum, Toxoplasma gondii, or
Leishmania infantum. The variation in antigen yield with Percoll purification at different
centrifugation speeds was only 15.25%, indicating that the use of standard centrifuges (6000×g)
does not compromise results. Serological analysis revealed a 71.4% positivity rate among
samples collected from farms in Bahia with reported trypanosomiasis outbreaks—16% higher
than parasitological diagnoses. These findings are promising for conducting
xiii
seroepidemiological surveys in Bahia, allowing for more accurate mapping of parasite
circulation. The immunosuppression protocol involving five doses of 2 mg/kg dexamethasone
administered intravenously on alternate days yielded the best results for increasing parasitemia
in a shorter period. It was concluded that using blood smears for the detection of anti-T. vivax
IgG antibodies via IFA is effective, less costly, and less labor-intensive compared to antigen
purification techniques described in the literature. Furthermore, to avoid sensitization of slides
with antigens adsorbed by antibodies and nonspecific reactions, parasites should be collected
during the first peak of parasitemia, within the first 10 days of infection, prior to the animal’s
seroconversion period.