Resumo:
This corp.orality-dissert.Action starts from questioning ethical and methodological
stances and choices, which reproduce racial violence, committed by Dance
mediators, teachers from the UFBA and FUNCEB Dance Schools. With this, we seek
philosophies, pedagogies, didactics and content for teaching and creating Dance,
which distance the symbolic death of racialized bodies, as is naturalized by
professionals in the aforementioned schools. Guided by the technological framework,
conceived by professor Dr. Sandra Petit, Pretagogy, this research has as an
investigative strategy the applicability of Pretagogy in the field of Dance, in the 1st
moment: an experience of pedagogical action in the Education of Young People and
Adults at School Municipal Campinas de Pirajá, in Salvador-Bahia, and in the 2nd
moment: an experimentation of a Dance choreography wrapped in a comic book,
which has as its ignitive motto the Africanity Marker - Aesthetics (Afrofuturist). In order
to reflect on the pedagogical and choreographic possibilities in Dance with futuristic
perspectives that do not require the authorization of whiteness or guidelines from the
colonizer to exist in practice. Due to the lack of studies that characterize the type of
action that is established here, an investigative approach to the way of being black in
the world, that is, collective, spiritual, ancestral, holistic, cosmoperceived, it is
necessary to propose new methodologies/academic research techniques, identified
here by the “Negr.Ação” approach. It bathes in the teachings of his ancestors:
Amadou Hampâté Bâ (1981), Amélia Conrado (2006), Petrônio Domingues (2006),
Adilbênia Freire (2014), Sandra Petit (2015), Marilza Oliveira da Silva (2016), Nilma
Lino (2012, 2018), Jadiel Santos (2018), Katiúscia Ribeiro (2019), Bruno de Jesus
(2020), Fábio Kabral (2021), Lau Santos (2022), Muniz Sodré (2023), among others.
The research results aim to make a communicable scientific device available to
teachers-artists-researchers of the arts, committed to complying with law 11.645/08,
as well as the materialization of a disruptive artistic result of what is considered a
“work of dance”.