Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/15905
Tipo: Artigo de Periódico
Título: Potentially modifiable factors associated with non-adherence to phosphate binder use in patients on hemodialysis
Título(s) alternativo(s): BMC Nephrology
Autor(es): Martins, Maria Tereza Silveira
Silva, Luciana Ferreira
Kraychete, Angiolina Campos
Reis, Dandara
Dias, Lidiane
Schnitman, Gabriel
Oliveira, Lívia
Lopes, Gildete Barreto
Lopes, Antonio Alberto da Silva
Autor(es): Martins, Maria Tereza Silveira
Silva, Luciana Ferreira
Kraychete, Angiolina Campos
Reis, Dandara
Dias, Lidiane
Schnitman, Gabriel
Oliveira, Lívia
Lopes, Gildete Barreto
Lopes, Antonio Alberto da Silva
Abstract: Background: Despite the evidence that phosphate binder (PB) is associated with improved outcomes many hemodialysis patients do not adhere to prescribed PB regimen. Therefore, barriers to PB adherence should be identified and eliminated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate PB adherence among hemodialysis patients and to explore potentially modifiable factors associated with low PB adherence. Methods: A cross-sectional study (502 patients) was performed in four dialysis units in Salvador, Brazil, using data from the second phase of the Prospective Study of the Prognosis of Chronic Hemodialysis Patients (PROHEMO). Patients were categorized as adherent or non-adherent to PB based on their responses to a semi-structured questionnaire. Results: Non-adherence to PB was observed for 65.7% of the patients. After adjustments for numerous covariates, cerebrovascular disease (odds ratio (OR), 3.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-10.61), higher PTH (OR per each 300 pg/mL, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.28), lack of comprehension of the appropriate time to use PB (OR, 7.09; 95% CI, 2.10-23.95) and stopping PB use after feeling better (OR, 4.54; 95% CI, 1.45-14.25) or feeling worse (OR, 11.04; 95% CI, 1.79- 68.03) were significantly associated with PB non-adherence. By contrast, the adjusted odds of PB non-adherence were lower for patients with more years on dialysis (OR by each 2 years, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.95), with serum phosphorus above 5.5 mg/dL (OR, 0.53; 95% CI 0.34-0.82), who referred that were encouraged by the dialysis staff to be independent (OR, 0.52; 95% CI 0.30-0.90), and reported that the nephrologist explained how PB should be used (OR, 0.20; 95% CI 0.05-0.73). Conclusion: The results of the present study are encouraging by showing evidence that improvement in the care provided by the dialysis staff and the attending nephrologist may play an important role in reducing the high prevalence of non-adherence to PB in maintenance hemodialysis patients. A new questionnaire is presented and may help to evaluate systematically the patients regarding PB adherence in hemodialysis setting.
Palavras-chave: Hemodialysis
Phosphate binder
Adherence
País: Brasil
Tipo de Acesso: Acesso Aberto
URI: http://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/15905
Data do documento: 2013
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo Publicado em Periódico (Faculdade de Medicina)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
1471-2369-14-208.pdf206,84 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.