Skip navigation
Universidade Federal da Bahia |
Repositório Institucional da UFBA
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/12925
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorSolon, Lílian Grace da Silva-
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Gerlane Bernardo Coelho-
dc.contributor.authorAraújo, Aurigena Antunes de-
dc.contributor.authorBarichello, José Mário-
dc.contributor.authorPérez Urizar, José-
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Luiz Alberto Lira-
dc.creatorSolon, Lílian Grace da Silva-
dc.creatorGuerra, Gerlane Bernardo Coelho-
dc.creatorAraújo, Aurigena Antunes de-
dc.creatorBarichello, José Mário-
dc.creatorPérez Urizar, José-
dc.creatorSoares, Luiz Alberto Lira-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-12T17:06:42Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-12T17:06:42Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn2176-9451-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/12925-
dc.descriptionp.48-54pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine naproxen concentrations in rat plasma samples by HPLC and to compare the bioavailability of a generic and two compounded naproxen sodium suspensions (test 1 and test 2). Analysis was run at a fl ow rate of 1.2 mL.min-1 with a mobile phase of acetonitrile: NaH2PO4 0.01 M pH 4.00 (50:50, v/v) at 280 nm, using a C18 column (150 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 μm). The calibration curve was linear (R2 = 0.9987) over the range of 0.25 - 200 μg.mL-1. The precision for inter and intra-day analysis ranged from 2.46% to 12.39%. Cmax, Tmax and AUCt were 191.25 ± 11.17 μg.mL-1, 1.00 ± 0.106 h and 2438.16 ± 291.34 μg.h.mL-1 for the reference drug, 188.22 ± 24.78 μg.mL-1, 1.06 ± 0.092 h and 1755.02 ± 228.90 μg.h.mL-1 for test 1, and 160.50 ± 10.58 μg.mL-1, 0.66 ± 0.102 h and 1955.28 ± 142.80 μg.h.mL-1 for test 2. No signifi cant differences were found based on analysis of variance, with mean values and 90% CI of test2/reference ratio (Cmax 83.92% and AUCt 80.19%). For test1/reference ratio, the result was Cmax 98.41% and AUCt 71.98%. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the validated method was successfully applied to this study; the test 1 formulation failed to demonstrate a bioequivalence to the reference drug; however, the test 2 and reference naproxen sodium suspension were bioequivalent in terms of the rate and extent of absorption under these conditions.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.sourcehttp://dx.doi.org/10.4172/1948-593X.1000021pt_BR
dc.subjectBioavailability studiespt_BR
dc.subjectValidationpt_BR
dc.subjectHPLCpt_BR
dc.subjectPharmacokineticspt_BR
dc.subjectCompounded naproxen sodium suspensionpt_BR
dc.titleComparative bioavailability of a generic and two compounded naproxen sodium suspensions administered to ratspt_BR
dc.title.alternativeDental Press Journal of Orthodonticspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.numberv. 2, n. 2pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo Publicado em Periódico (FAR)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
JBABM-02-048.pdf1,16 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.