Skip navigation
Universidade Federal da Bahia |
Repositório Institucional da UFBA
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/12311
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorFreire, Rafael Rodrigues-
dc.contributor.authorMedeiros, Yvonilde Dantas Pinto-
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Ilce Marília Pinto-
dc.contributor.authorStifelman, Golde Maria-
dc.contributor.authorO´Keeffe, Jay-
dc.creatorFreire, Rafael Rodrigues-
dc.creatorMedeiros, Yvonilde Dantas Pinto-
dc.creatorFreitas, Ilce Marília Pinto-
dc.creatorStifelman, Golde Maria-
dc.creatorO´Keeffe, Jay-
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-26T17:40:38Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-26T17:40:38Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/12311-
dc.descriptionp. 115-123pt_BR
dc.description.abstractTraditionally, water resource management has been developed using an essentially technical approach. Currently, public opinion on water resource management is formed as a result of growing environmental concerns and social conflicts arising from poorly planned actions. Environmental problems are complex and have multiple dimensions, including social and economic. Therefore, the inclusion of a human dimension in integrated assessment methodologies is required for the introduction of new elements to the water management planning process. Environmental water allocation (EWA) is understood as the quantity, quality and distribution of water required for the maintenance of the functions and processes of aquatic ecosystems on which people depend. Within the various holistic assessment methodologies, the Building Block Methodology (BBM) was found to be the most suitable, in the Brazilian context, for maintaining and restoring essential elements of the natural flow regime. This article describes the process of social participation in the environmental flow assessment (EFA) for the Sao Francisco River, and compares it with some of the lessons learned from EFA in other parts of the world. The process involved multiple stakeholders who have conflicting interests. BBM was used to guide the field interviews, to incorporate the empirical observations by the local population and to guide the methodological procedures of the multidisciplinary team. The results of the study indicate the effectiveness of this holistic approach in organizing the elements to be evaluated. It also facilitated important contributions to the establishment of a dialogue between the actors to achieve a better understanding of the multiple aspects involved in the decisions associated with the EWA.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.publisherRevista Eletrônica de Gestão e Tecnologias Ambientaispt_BR
dc.subjectsocial participationpt_BR
dc.subjectenvironmental flow assessmentpt_BR
dc.subjectbuilding block methodologypt_BR
dc.titleSocial participation in the environmental flow assessment: the São Francisco river case studypt_BR
dc.title.alternativeRevista Eletrônica de Gestão e Tecnologias Ambientaispt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.numberv. 1, n. 1pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo Publicado em Periódico (IGEO)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
AAAAA.pdf_3343,97 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.