1. Universidade Federal da Bahia
  2. Instituto de Ciências da Saúde (ICS)
  3. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Processos Interativos dos Órgãos e Sistemas (PPGPIOS)
  4. Tese (PPGPIOS)
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/38045
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorCypriano, Cybele Perciano-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-16T16:52:53Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-16T16:52:53Z-
dc.date.issued2023-02-09-
dc.identifier.citationCypriano, Cybele P. AVALIAÇÃO PSICOMÉTRICA DO QUESTIONÁRIO DE ACEITAÇÃO E AÇÃO-II E AFERIÇÃO DO IMPACTO DO ESTRESSE NO BEM-ESTAR PSICOLÓGICO A PARTIR DA INFLEXIBILIDADE PSICOLÓGICA. [Salvador-Bahia-Brasil]: UFBA; 2023.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/38045-
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire- II (AAQ-II) and the impact of stress on psychological well-being (BEP), considering psychological inflexibility (PI) as a mediator, among people who undergo or have undergone psychotherapy. or psychiatric treatment. Results showed N=1,128 between 18 and 65 years old, recruited from 40,000 emails sent to UFBA undergraduates. The sociodemographic questionnaire, AAQ-II, WHO-5 and the DASS-21 stress subscale were used. The AAQ-II showed high data factorability (KMO = 0.91), internal consistency (GLB = 0.92, Cronbach's alpha = 0.89) and Weighted Root Mean Square Residual (WRMR = 0.061). It showed unidimensional congruence values (I-UniCo > 0.95, I-ECV > 0.85) and a problematic residual index (IREAL) only for item 2. The factorial solution showed a satisfactory fit (X2 = 267.21 , RMSEA = 0.077, NNFI = 0.97, CFI = 0.98, AGFI = 0.99), with all factor loadings greater than 0.30, with the exception of one item (0.28). The reliability of the other scales used was evaluated and the mediation model was tested for total and indirect effect. Next, data were analyzed by type of treatment received, using the t-test, MANOVA (p-value/Bonferroni) and confidence interval (Cohen's d). The results indicated that the AAQ-II has satisfactory psychometric properties in this sample and that PI mediates the relationship between stress and BEP. Therefore, a high level of stress is associated with lower BEP due to the presence of IP. Having undergone or undergoing psychotherapy or psychiatric treatment decreases PI.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPESpt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal da Bahhiapt_BR
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectEstresse psicológicopt_BR
dc.subjectBem-estar psicológicopt_BR
dc.subjectQuestionário de aceitação e ação- IIpt_BR
dc.subjectPsicometriapt_BR
dc.subject.otherPsychological stresspt_BR
dc.subject.otherPsychological well-beingpt_BR
dc.subject.otherAcceptance and action questionnaire-IIpt_BR
dc.subject.otherPsychometrypt_BR
dc.titleAvaliação psicométrica do questionário de aceitação e ação-II e aferição do impacto do estresse no bem-estar psicológico a partir da inflexibilidade psicológicapt_BR
dc.title.alternativePsychometric evaluation of the acceptance and action questionnaire-II and assessment of the impact of stress on psychological well-being from psychological inflexibilitypt_BR
dc.typeTesept_BR
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Processos Interativos dos Órgãos e Sistemas (PPGORGSISTEM) pt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFBApt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqCNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDEpt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Oliveira, Irismar Reis de-
dc.contributor.advisor1IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9680-9247pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9917831991703953pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor2Santos, Pedro Paulo Pires dos-
dc.contributor.advisor2IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8831-9056pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4055072572287569pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Oliveira, Irismar Reis de-
dc.contributor.referee1IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9680-9247pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9917831991703953pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Thomé, Célia Regina-
dc.contributor.referee2ID0009-0001-3677-9269pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2502103562577403pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3Kusterer, Liliane Lins-
dc.contributor.referee3IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3736-0002pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6812604321195477pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee4Santos, Pedro Paulo Pires dos-
dc.contributor.referee4IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8831-9056pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee4Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4055072572287569pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee5Araújo, Ricardo Henrique de Sousa-
dc.contributor.referee5IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1404-8577pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee5Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9011584446631374pt_BR
dc.creator.IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4997-8635.pt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2654077408366570pt_BR
dc.description.resumoEste estudo avaliou as propriedades psicométricas do questionário de aceitação e ação-II (AAQ- II) e o impacto do estresse no bem-estar psicológico (BEP), considerando a inflexibilidade psicológica (IP) como mediadora, entre pessoas que fazem ou fizeram psicoterapia ou tratamento psiquiátrico. Resultados mostraram N=1.128 entre 18 e 65 anos, recrutados a partir de 40.000 e-mails enviados para graduandos da UFBA. Usaram-se o questionário sociodemográfico, AAQ-II, WHO-5 e subescala de estresse da DASS-21. O AAQ-II mostrou alta fatorabilidade dos dados (KMO = 0,91), consistência interna (GLB = 0,92, alfa de Cronbach = 0,89) e Weighted Root Mean Square Residual (WRMR = 0,061) adequados. Demonstrou valores de congruência unidimensional (I-UniCo > 0,95, I-ECV > 0,85) e um índice de resíduo (IREAL) problemático apenas para o item 2. A solução fatorial evidenciou um ajuste satisfatório (X2 = 267,21, RMSEA = 0,077, NNFI = 0,97, CFI = 0,98, AGFI = 0,99), sendo todas as cargas fatoriais foram superiores a 0,30, com exceção de um item (0,28). Avaliou-se a confiabilidade das demais escalas utilizadas e foi testado o modelo de mediação para efeito total e indireto. A seguir, analisaram-se os dados por tipo de tratamento recebido, através do teste t, MANOVA (p-valor/Bonferroni) e intervalo de confiança (d de Cohen). Os resultados indicaram que o AAQ-II possui propriedades psicométricas satisfatórias nesta amostra e que a IP medeia a relação entre estresse e BEP. Portanto, alto nível de estresse está associado a menor BEP pela presença da IP. Ter feito ou fazer psicoterapia ou tratamento psiquiátrico, diminui a IP.pt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentInstituto de Ciências da Saúde - ICSpt_BR
dc.relation.references1. Zaba Neto, A. Stress e qualidade de vida [Internet]. Instituto Assaly. 2019 [citado 26 de setembro de 2022]. Disponível em: https://institutoassaly.com.br/blog/stress-e-qualidade-de- vida/ 2. Lipp, M.E.N. Stress e transtornos mentais durante a pandemia da COVID-19 no Brasil. Bol - Acad Paul Psicol [Internet]. dezembro de 2020 [citado 26 de setembro de 2022];40(99):180–91. Disponível em: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1415- 711X2020000200003&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt 3. Association AER, Association AP, Education NC on M in, organizadores. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. New Orleans: American Educational Research Association; 2011. 4. Barbosa LM, Murta SG. Propriedades psicométricas iniciais do Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - II - versão brasileira. Psico-USF [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28 de agosto de 2021];20(1):75–85. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413- 82712015000100008&lng=pt&tlng=pt 5. Sadir, M. A., Bignotto, M. M., Lipp, M.E.N. Stress e qualidade de vida: influência de algumas variáveis pessoais. Paideia. 2010;20:73–81. 6. Margis R, Picon P, Cosner AF, Silveira R de O. Relação Entre Estressores, Estresse e Ansiedade. Rev Psiquiatr Rio Gd Sul [Internet]. abril de 2003 [citado 19 de janeiro de 2022];25:65–74. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/j/rprs/a/Jfqm4RbzpJhbxskLSCzmgjb/?lang=pt 7. Lipp, M. E. N., Tanganelli, M. S. Stress e qualidade de vida em Magistrados da Justiça do Trabalho: diferenças entre homens e mulheres. Psicol Reflex E Crítica [Internet]. 2002 [citado 22 de outubro de 2022];15:537–48. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/j/prc/a/9CHGKL5JLkzQb4LJZ8QsDhC/abstract/?lang=pt 8. Borine R de CC, Wanderley K da S, Bassitt DP. Relação entre a qualidade de vida e o estresse em acadêmicos da área da saúde. Estud Interdiscip Em Psicol [Internet]. junho de 2015 [citado 6 de outubro de 2022];6(1):100–18. Disponível em: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2236- 64072015000100008&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt 9. Isabely IR, Renata RS, Graziela GT. Estilo de vida e bem-estar de estudantes da área da saúde. Enferm Actual Costa Rica [Internet]. [citado 19 de maio de 2021];(34):67–81. Disponível em: https://www.redalyc.org/jatsRepo/448/44854610006/html/index.html 10. The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. - PsycNET [Internet]. [citado 8 de junho de 2020]. Disponível em: https://content.apa.org/record/2015-13569-001 84 11. Feather, G., Williams, M. The moderating effects of psychological flexibility and psychological inflexibility on the relationship between climate concern and climate-related distress. J Context Behav Sci. 2022;23:137–43. 12. Baker, L. D., Berghoff, C., R. Embracing complex models: Exploratory network analyses of psychological (In)Flexibility processes and unique associations with psychiatric symptomology and quality of life. J Context Behav Sci. 2022;23:64–74. 13. Melo, W. V., Olaz, F., Pergher, G. K. Terapia de Aceitação e Compromisso. Em: Federação Brasileira de Terapias Cognitivas. Porto Alegre: Artmed Panamericana; 2018. p. 109–50. (PROCOGNITIVA-Programa de Atualização em Terapia Cognitivo Comportamental.; vol. 1). 14. Medeiros AGAP de, Junior JASH. Terapia de aceitação e compromisso em idosos: revisão sistemática. Rev Bras Ter Cogn [Internet]. 2019 [citado 21 de janeiro de 2022];15(2):112–9. Disponível em: http://www.rbtc.org.br/detalhe_artigo.asp?id=296 15. Larsson A, Hartley S, McHugh L. A randomised controlled trial of brief web-based acceptance and commitment Therapy on the general mental health, depression, anxiety and stress of college Students. J Context Behav Sci [Internet]. 2022 [citado 30 de março de 2022];24:10–7. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144722000114 16. Barbosa LM, Murta SG. Terapia de aceitação e compromisso: história, fundamentos, modelo e evidências. Rev Bras Ter Comportamental E Cogn [Internet]. 2014 [citado 4 de outubro de 2022];16(3):34–49. Disponível em: https://rbtcc.webhostusp.sti.usp.br/index.php/RBTCC/article/view/711 17. Hayes SC, Hofmann SG. The third wave of cognitive behavioral therapy and the rise of process‐based care. World Psychiatry [Internet]. outubro de 2017 [citado 5 de abril de 2022];16(3):245–6. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5608815/ 18. Grant, A., Cassidy, S. Exploring the relationship between psychological flexibility and self-report and task-based measures of cognitive flexibility. J Context Behav Sci. 2022;23:144–50. 19. Bernardes MEM. Transformação do pensamento e da linguagem na aprendizagem de conceitos. Psicol Educ [Internet]. 2008 [citado 1o de abril de 2022];(26):67–85. Disponível em: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1414- 69752008000100005&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt 20. Uehara, E., Helenice, C. F., Jesus, L. F. Funções Executivas: um retrato integrativo dos principais modelos e teorias desse conceito. Neuropsicol Latinoam. 2013;25–37. 21. Schneider, W, Shiffrin, R. Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: Detection, Serch and Attention. Psychol Rev. 1997;1–66. 22. Miyake, A, Friedman, NP, Emerson, MJ, Witzki, AH, Howerter, A, Wager, TD. The Unity and diversity of executive Functions and their Contributions to Complex Frontal Lobe 85 Tasks: a Latent variable Analysis. Cognit Psychol. 2000;41:49–100. 23. Diamond, A. Executive Functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;135–68. 24. Baddeley, A. The Central Executive: a Concept and Some Misconceptions. J Int Neoropsychological Soc. 1988;4:523–6. 25. Baggetta P, Alexander PA. Conceptualization and Operationalization of Executive Function. Mind Brain Educ [Internet]. 2016 [citado 2 de junho de 2022];10(1):10–33. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/mbe.12100 26. Dias, N.M., Seabra, A. G. Funções executivas: desenvolvimento e intervenção-Temas sobre desenvolvimento. ResearchGate. 2013;8. 27. World Health Organization. World Health Organization. WHOQOL user manual. [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland; 1998. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/who_qol_user_manual_98.pdf 28. The Whoqol Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties1This paper was drafted by Mick Power and Willem Kuyken on behalf of the WHOQOL Group. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 15 de junho de 1998 [citado 8 de outubro de 2022];46(12):1569–85. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953698000094 29. Berlim MT, Fleck MPA. “Quality of life”: a brand new concept for research and practice in psychiatry. Braz J Psychiatry [Internet]. outubro de 2003 [citado 8 de outubro de 2022];25:249–52. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/j/rbp/a/ZTfZVhMzdr8whM7Xmzz95Wz/?lang=en 30. Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57:1069–81. 31. RIOS, O.F. L. S. Níveis de stress e depressão em estudantes universitários [Internet]. [São Paulo]: PUC-SP; 2006 [citado 21 de outubro de 2022]. Disponível em: https://tede2.pucsp.br/bitstream/handle/15516/1/OlgaDeFatimaLeiteRios.pdf 32. Lipp, M. E. N. Stress e suas implicações. Estud Em Psicol. 1984;5–19. 33. Selye,H. Perspectives in Stress Research. Johns Hopkins Univ Press. 1959;2(4):403–16. 34. Moreira, M. D., Mello Filho, J. de. Psicoimunologia hoje. Em: Psicossomática hoje. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1992. p. 119–51. 35. Abreu KL de, Stoll I, Ramos LS, Baumgardt RA, Kristensen CH. Estresse ocupacional e Síndrome de Burnout no exercício profissional da psicologia. Psicol Ciênc E Prof [Internet]. junho de 2002 [citado 5 de dezembro de 2022];22:22–9. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/j/pcp/a/nHqtFfWQX4h3yHBdrrmSbBN/abstract/?lang=pt 36. Lipp, M.E.N. Pesquisas sobre stress no Brasil. Campinas: Papirus; 1997. 86 37. Lipp, M.E.N., Tanganelli, M. S. Estresse emocional: a contribuicao de estressores internos e externos. Bibl Virtual Em Saúde-BVS. 2002;537–48. 38. Levin ME, Luoma JB, Haeger JA. Decoupling as a Mechanism of Change in Mindfulness and Acceptance: A Literature Review. Psychol Fac Publ [Internet]. 2015;56. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/psych_facpub/1095 39. Haves SC, Wilson KG, Gifford EV, Follette VM, Strosahl K. Experiential Avoidance and Behavioral Disorders: A Functional Dimensional Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64:29. 40. Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses. Cogn Ther Res [Internet]. 1o de outubro de 2012 [citado 5 de abril de 2022];36(5):427–40. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584580/ 41. Beck AT. Thinking and Depression: I. Idiosyncratic Content and Cognitive Distortions. Arch Gen Psychiatry [Internet]. 1963 [citado 28 de março de 2022];9(4):324. Disponível em: http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/archpsyc.1963.01720160014002 42. Beck, A T., Rush, A.J., Shaw, B. F., Emery, G. Cognitive Therapy of Depression. 1 st. New York: The Guilford Press; 1979. 43. Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther [Internet]. 2006 [citado 22 de janeiro de 2022];44(1):1–25. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796705002147 44. Twohig MP. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Introduction. Cogn Behav Pract [Internet]. 1o de novembro de 2012 [citado 31 de maio de 2022];19(4):499–507. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077722912000508 45. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behav Ther [Internet]. 2004 [citado 28 de agosto de 2021];35(4):639–65. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789404800133 46. Hayes SC, Barnes-Holmes D, Roche B. Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. New York: Springer; 2001. 47. Hofmann SG, Hayes SC. TCC Moderna CBT: movendo-se em direção a terapias baseadas em processos. Rev Bras Ter Cogn [Internet]. dezembro de 2018 [citado 4 de outubro de 2022];14(2):77–84. Disponível em: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1808- 56872018000200003&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt 48. Hayes SC, Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. [Internet]. New York: Guilford Press; 1999 [citado 23 de janeiro de 2022]. Disponível em: https://contextualscience.org/publications/hayes_strosahl_wilson_1999 87 49. Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses. Cogn Ther Res. 1o de outubro de 2012;36(5):427–40. 50. Sidman M. Equivalence Relations and Behavior: A Research Story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative; 1994. 51. Yesilyaprak N, Batmaz S, Yildiz M, Songur E, Akpinar Aslan E. Automatic thoughts, cognitive distortions, dysfunctional attitudes, core beliefs, and ruminative response styles in unipolar major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder: a comparative study. Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol [Internet]. 2019 [citado 24 de março de 2022];29(4):854–63. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/24750573.2019.1690815 52. Rego TC. Vygotsky: Uma perspectiva histórico-cultural da educação. 25a edição. Petrópolis, RJ: Editora Vozes; 2014. 53. Luoma, J. B., Hayes S. C., Walser, R. D. Learning ACT: An Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Skills Training Manual for Therapists. 2nd Second Edition, Revised ed. Oakland, CA: Context Press; 2017. 54. Lezak, M. The Problem of Assessing Executive Functions. Int J Psychol. 1982;17:281– 97. 55. Baddeley, A, Hitch, G. Working Memory. Psychol Learn Motiv. 1974;8:47–89. 56. Atkinson, R. C., Shiffrin, R. M. The Control of Short-Term Memory. Sci Am [Internet]. 1971;225:82–90. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24922803 57. Rezende, Eduardo. Funções Executivas: História e conceitos dentro da psicologia [Internet]. PsicoEdu. [citado 30 de maio de 2022]. Disponível em: https://www.psicoedu.com.br/2018/09/funcoes-executivas-psicologia.html 58. Hayes SC, Luoma J, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, Processes, and Outcomes. Em: The Act in Context. 1o ed Abgdon: Routledge; 2015. 59. A-Tjak JGL, Davis ML, Morina N, Powers MB, Smits JAJ, Emmelkamp PMG. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(1):30–6. 60. Hayes SC. The Act in Context: The Canonical Papers of Steven C. Hayes. New York: Routledge; 2015. 354 p. 61. Stynes, G., Leão, C. S., McHugh, L. Exploring the effectiveness of mindfulness-based and third wave interventions in addressing self-stigma, shame and their impacts on psychosocial functioning: A systematic review. J Context Behav Sci [Internet]. 2022 [citado 30 de março de 2022];23:174–89. Disponível em: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S2212144722000060?token=F3DFBCA6B8DAA485 783DD11420368D7433204E493D2232402BC25AEB4BF8DCDF4002FC88CAD59580ECC 2A64FA0C5A0DC&originRegion=us-east-1&originCreation=20220330125722 88 62. Oliveira IR de. Trial-Based Cognitive Therapy: A Manual for Clinicians. 1 edition. New York: Routledge; 2014. 224 p. 63. Maria Amélia Penido, Vania Bitencourt Powell, Irismar Reis de Oliveira. Terapia cognitivo-comportamental do transtorno de ansiedade social. Em: Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria; Nardi AE, Silva AG, Quevedo JL, organizadores. Porto Alegre: Artmed Panamericana; 2014. p. 107–30. (PROPSIQ programa de atualização em psiquiatria; vol. 4). 64. Powell VB, Oliveira OH de, Seixas C, Almeida C, Grangeon MC, Caldas M, et al. Changing core beliefs with trial-based cognitive therapy may improve quality of life in social phobia: a randomized study. Rev Bras Psiquiatr [Internet]. setembro de 2013 [citado 9 de setembro de 2018];35(3):243–7. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1516- 44462013000300243&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en 65. Kostoglou SL, Pidgeon AM. The Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire: Psychometric validation for an Australian population. Aust J Psychol [Internet]. 1o de junho de 2016 [citado 24 de março de 2022];68(2):123–9. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12101 66. Batmaz S, Kocbiyik,Sibel, Yuncu, Ozgur Ahmet. Turkish Version of the Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties. Hindawi Publ Corp. 2015;2015. 67. de Oliveira IR, Seixas C, Osório FL, Crippa JAS, de Abreu JN, Menezes IG, et al. Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire (CD- Quest) in a Sample of Undergraduate Students. Innov Clin Neurosci [Internet]. 2015 [citado 24 de março de 2022];12(7–8):20–7. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558787/ 68. Hayes SC, Kirk D. Strosahl, Kelly G. Wilson. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. The Process and Practice of Mindful Change. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Publications; 2016. 69. Bach, P. A, Moran, D. J. ACT in Practice: Case Conceptualization in Acceptance & Commitment Therapy. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications; 2008. 70. Harris R, Hayes SC. ACT Made Simple: An Easy-To-Read Primer on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. 2o edição. New Harbinger Publications; 2019. 394 p. 71. Baer R. Assessing Mindfulness and Acceptance Processes in Clients: Illuminating the Theory and Practice of Change. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications; 2010. 330 p. 72. Hayes SC. Contextual approuach to therapeutic change. Em: Psychotherapists in clinical practice: cognitive and behavioral perspectives. New York: Guilford; 1987. p. 327– 87. 73. Greenberg SS, School SD, Kelley DM. Creative Acts for Curious People: How to Think, Create, and Lead in Unconventional Ways. Emeryville: Ten Speed Press; 2021. 74. Freitas, E. R., Barbosa, A. J. G. Intervenções Clínicas em Grupos de Idosos: A Depressão em Foco. PROPSIQ - Soc Bras Psicol. 2021;4:9–48. 89 75. Amer, J. Pratical Management of Depression. JAMA. 1964; 76. Wu Q, Feng J, Pan CW. Risk factors for depression in the elderly: An umbrella review of published meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Elsevier J Affect Disord [Internet]. 2022 [citado 30 de março de 2022]; Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032722003093 77. Peckham AD, McHugh RK, Otto MW. A meta-analysis of the magnitude of biased attention in depression. Depress Anxiety [Internet]. 2010 [citado 19 de abril de 2022];27(12):1135–42. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/da.20755 78. Kovács M, Beck A. Cognitive-Affective Processes in Depression. Em 1979. 79. Gotlib, I. H., Joormann, J. Cognition and Depression: Current Status and Future Directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;285–312. 81. Kline NS. The Practical Management of Depression. JAMA [Internet]. 1964 [citado 29 de março de 2022];190(8):732–40. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1964.03070210038007 82. Salazar de Pablo G, Solmi M, Vaquerizo-Serrano J, Radua J, Passina A, Mosillo P, et al. Primary prevention of depression: An umbrella review of controlled interventions. J Affect Disord [Internet]. 2021 [citado 31 de março de 2022];294:957–70. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032721007801 83. American Psychiatric Association, American Psychiatric Association, organizadores. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. 947 p. 84. Wang Q, Wang C, Deng Q, Zhan L, Tang Y, Li H, et al. Alterations of regional spontaneous brain activities in anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis. J Affect Disord [Internet]. 2022 [citado 30 de março de 2022];296:233–40. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032721010211 85. Hayes SC, Smith S. Get Out of Your Mind & Into Your Life: The New Acceptance & Commitment Therapy: The New Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Illustrated edição. Oakland, Calif: New Harbinger Publications; 2005. 86. Macedo LSR de, Silveira A da C da. Self: um conceito em desenvolvimento. Paid Ribeirão Preto [Internet]. agosto de 2012 [citado 5 de novembro de 2022];22:281–90. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/j/paideia/a/Bcb4hf9B9TmfwqZJtQRPTRs/?lang=pt 87. Hayes SC. A Liberated Mind: How to Pivot Toward What Matters. Avery; 2019. 446 p. 88. Hayes SC, M. D. Sonntag RF. Cognitive Defusion. 1a edição. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Pubns Inc; 2007. 89. Bruijniks, S., J. E., Meeter, M., Lemmens, L., Peeters, F., Cuijpers, P., Renner, F., et al. Mechanistic pathways of change in twice weekly versus once weekly sessions of psychotherapy for depression. Behav Res Ther. 2022;151. 90 90. Dobson, K. S., Dozois, D. J. D. Historical and philosophical bases of the cognitive- behavioral therapies. In K. S. Dobson (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press. 2010; 91. Twohig MP, Hayes SC. ACT en la práctica clínica para la depresión y la ansiedad. Una guía sesión a sesión para maximizar los resultados. Desclée De Brouwer; 2020. 433 p. 92. Melo, W., Olaz, F., Perger, G. Terapia de aceitação e compromisso. Em: PROCOGNITIVA Programa de Atualização em Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental: Porto Alegre: Artmed Panamericana; 2018. p. 109–50. (Ciclo 5; vol. 1). 93. Hofmann, SG, Hayes, SC, Lorscheid, DN. Learning Process-Based Therapy: A Skills Training Manual for Targeting the Core Processes of Psychological Change in Clinical Practice. Oakland: Context Press; 2021. 94. Six Principles of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. [Internet]. Explore Our Extensive Counselling Article Library. 2014 [citado 21 de janeiro de 2022]. Disponível em: https://www.aipc.net.au/articles/six-principles-of-acceptance-and-commitment-therapy/ 95. Mpsych JK, PhD LWC. The ACT Workbook for Perfectionism: Build Your Best (Imperfect) Life Using Powerful Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Self-Compassion Skills. Workbook edição. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications; 2021. 96. Harris R, Hayes SC. The Happiness Trap: How to Stop Struggling and Start Living: A Guide to ACT. 1a edição. Trumpeter; 2008. 258 p. 97. Hayes SC, Barcellos ACB, Haydu VB, Galbes V. UM ENFOQUE CONTEXTUAL PARA MUDANÇA TERAPÊUTICA. :54. 98. Hayes DS. A Liberated Mind: The essential guide to ACT. Vermilion; 2019. 99. Hayes SC, Follette VM, Linehan MM, organizadores. Mindfulness and Acceptance: Expanding the Cognitive-Behavioral Tradition. Guilford Publications; 2011. 100. Gloster AT, Walder N, Levin ME, Twohig MP, Karekla M. The empirical status of acceptance and commitment therapy: A review of meta-analyses | Elsevier Enhanced Reader. 2020 [citado 21 de março de 2022];18:181–92. Disponível em: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S2212144720301940?token=B5E2C67FC4CCF074C E1116F3F5DA6B857A54272AC84F889C455EEB3433D5233014FD92CE4494D8B5006C7 BC1D14AB427&originRegion=us-east-1&originCreation=20220321123255 101. Walser RD, Dclinpsy CC. The Heart of ACT: Developing a Flexible, Process-Based, and Client-Centered Practice Using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Oakland, CA: Context Press; 2019. 102. Dahlin, M., Johansson, A., Romare, H., Carlbring, P., Andersson, G. Worry-specific versus self-tailored internet-based treatments for generalized anxiety disorder, with scheduled support or support on demand: A pilot factorial design trial | Elsevier Enhanced Reader. Elsevier Internet Interv [Internet]. 2022 [citado 30 de março de 2022];28. Disponível em: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S2214782922000380?token=2CB5FD8A292542217 91 EE8FD6F3FC8DED0015FB7E1DCFC044EBF2AB386AF19CD9F90A290BB4026D6468EF 02780F825F55B&originRegion=us-east-1&originCreation=20220330192352 103. Hayes S, Harris R. ACT Made Simple: An Easy-To-Read Primer on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications; 2009. 104. Hayes, 1993 | Association for Contextual Behavioral Science [Internet]. [citado 23 de janeiro de 2022]. Disponível em: https://contextualscience.org/node/2548 105. Hayes S, Hofmann SG. Process Based CBT: The Science and Core Clinical Competencies of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Second edition. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications; 2018. 106. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Polusny, M. A., et al. Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. Psychological Record. 2004; 107. Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, et al. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther. 2011;42(4):676–88. 108. Pinto-Gouveia J, Carvalho T, Cunha M, Duarte J, Walser RD. Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–Trauma Specific (AAQ-TS): A study with Portuguese Colonial War Veterans. J Affect Disord [Internet]. outubro de 2015 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];185:81–9. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165032715003973 109. Pakenham KI, Fleming M. Relations between acceptance of multiple sclerosis and positive and negative adjustments. Psychol Health [Internet]. 1o de outubro de 2011 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];26(10):1292–309. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2010.517838 110. Losada A, Márquez-González M, Romero-Moreno R, López J. Development and validation of the Experiential Avoidance in Caregiving Questionnaire (EACQ). Aging Ment Health [Internet]. 3 de outubro de 2014 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];18(7):897–904. Disponível em: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13607863.2014.896868 111. Juarascio A, Forman E, Timko CA, Butryn M, Goodwin C. The development and validation of the food craving acceptance and action questionnaire (FAAQ). Eat Behav [Internet]. agosto de 2011 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];12(3):182–7. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1471015311000432 112. Juarascio A, Forman E, Timko CA, Butryn M, Goodwin C. The development and validation of the food craving acceptance and action questionnaire (FAAQ). Eat Behav [Internet]. agosto de 2011 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];12(3):182–7. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1471015311000432 113. Jacoby RJ, Abramowitz JS, Buchholz J, Reuman L, Blakey SM. Experiential avoidance in the context of obsessions: Development and validation of the Acceptance and Action 92 Questionnaire for Obsessions and Compulsions. J Obsessive-Compuls Relat Disord [Internet]. outubro de 2018 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];19:34–43. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221136491830085X 114. Dalrymple KL, Herbert JD. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder: A Pilot Study. Behav Modif [Internet]. 1o de setembro de 2007 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];31(5):543–68. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445507302037 115. Boffa JW, Tock JL, Morabito DM, Schmidt NB. Measuring Psychological Inflexibility of Suicidal Thoughts: The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Suicidal Ideation (AAQ- SI). Cogn Ther Res [Internet]. outubro de 2022 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];46(5):1016–29. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10608-022-10309-w 116. Beacham AO, Linfield K, Kinman CR, Payne-Murphy J. The chronic illness acceptance questionnaire: Confirmatory factor analysis and prediction of perceived disability in an online chronic illness support group sample. J Context Behav Sci [Internet]. abril de 2015 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];4(2):96–102. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212144715000150 117. Reneman MF, Kleen M, Trompetter HR, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Köke A, van Baalen B, et al. Measuring avoidance of pain: validation of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II-pain version. Int J Rehabil Res [Internet]. junho de 2014 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];37(2):125. Disponível em: https://journals.lww.com/intjrehabilres/Abstract/2014/06000/Measuring_avoidance_of_pain_ _validation_of_the.5.aspx 118. Whiting DL, Deane FP, Ciarrochi J, McLeod HJ, Simpson GK. Validating measures of psychological flexibility in a population with acquired brain injury. Psychol Assess [Internet]. junho de 2015 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];27(2):415–23. Disponível em: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/pas0000050 119. Trigueros R, Navarro-Gómez N, Aguilar-Parra JM, Cangas AJ. Factorial Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Stigma (AAQ-S) in Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 20 de janeiro de 2020 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];17(2):658. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/658 120. Tomé FR. Como estar entre os outros? O álcool como uma estrtégia de evitamento experiencial na ansiedade social. [Internet]. [Coimbra-Portugal]: Universidade de Coimbra; 2014. Disponível em: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43577416.pdf 121. Spatola CAM, Cappella EAM, Goodwin CL, Baruffi M, Malfatto G, Facchini M, et al. Development and initial validation of the Cardiovascular Disease Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (CVD-AAQ) in an Italian sample of cardiac patients. Front Psychol [Internet]. 14 de novembro de 2014 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];5. Disponível em: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01284/abstract 122. Pires CP, Putwain DW, Hofmann SG, Martins DS, MacKenzie MB, Kocovski NL, et al. Assessing psychological flexibility in test situations: The Test Anxiety Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Adolescents. Rev Psicopatología Psicol Clínica [Internet]. 30 de 93 dezembro de 2020 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];25(3):147. Disponível em: http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/RPPC/article/view/29014 123. Pinto VN, Ferreira MC, Valentini F. Evidências de Validade da Escala de Flexibilidade Psicológica no Trabalho em Amostras Brasileiras. Psico [Internet]. 25 de agosto de 2015 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];46(3):362–73. Disponível em: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistapsico/article/view/18679 124. Martins MJ, Castilho P, Macedo A, Pereira AT, Vagos P, Carvalho D, et al. A pilot study of the Portuguese version of the Voices Acceptance and Action Scale: Psychometric properties in a clinical sample with psychosis-spectrum disorders. Análise Psicológica [Internet]. 11 de março de 2019 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];37(1):107–18. Disponível em: http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1561 125. Levin ME, Krafft J, Pistorello J, Seeley JR. Assessing psychological inflexibility in university students: Development and validation of the acceptance and action questionnaire for university students (AAQ-US). J Context Behav Sci [Internet]. abril de 2019 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];12:199–206. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221214471830070X 126. Houghton DC, Compton SN, Twohig MP, Saunders SM, Franklin ME, Neal-Barnett AM, et al. Measuring the role of psychological inflexibility in Trichotillomania. Psychiatry Res [Internet]. dezembro de 2014 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];220(1–2):356–61. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165178114006970 127. Farris SG, Zvolensky MJ, DiBello AM, Schmidt NB. Validation of the Avoidance and Inflexibility Scale (AIS) among treatment-seeking smokers. Psychol Assess [Internet]. junho de 2015 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];27(2):467–77. Disponível em: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/pas0000059 128. Dochat C, Afari N, Wooldridge JS, Herbert MS, Gasperi M, Lillis J. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Weight-Related Difficulties- Revised (AAQW-R) in a United States sample of adults with overweight and obesity. J Context Behav Sci [Internet]. janeiro de 2020 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];15:189–96. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212144719302637 129. Burton Murray H, Zhang F, Manasse SM, Forman EM, Butryn ML, Juarascio AS. Validation of the food craving Acceptance and action questionnaire (FAAQ) in a weight loss- seeking sample. Appetite [Internet]. janeiro de 2022 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];168:105680. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0195666321005870 130. Bond FW, Lloyd J, Guenole N. The work-related acceptance and action questionnaire: Initial psychometric findings and their implications for measuring psychological flexibility in specific contexts. J Occup Organ Psychol [Internet]. 2013 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];86(3):331–47. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/joop.12001 131. Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Wellbeing measures in primary health care/ the depcare project. Em Stockholm, Sweden; 1998. 94 132. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. 2nd ed. Sydney, N.S.W.: Psychology Foundation of Australia; 1995. 42 p. (Psychology Foundation monograph). 133. Vignola RCB, Tucci AM. Adaptation and validation of the depression, anxiety and stress scale (DASS) to Brazilian Portuguese. J Affect Disord. fevereiro de 2014;155:104–9. 134. Lorenzo-Seva U, Timmerman ME, Kiers HAL. The Hull Method for Selecting the Number of Common Factors. Multivar Behav Res. 11 de abril de 2011;46(2):340–64. 135. Muthén B, Muthén L. Mplus. Em: Handbook of item response theory 2017. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2017. 136. JASP. JASP Team; 2022. 137. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Análise multivariada de dados. Bookman Editora; 2009. 682 p. 138. Zinbarg RE, Revelle W, Yovel I, Li W. Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ωH: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika [Internet]. 2005 [citado 5 de dezembro de 2022];70(1):123–33. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7 139. Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando PJ. Factor 9.2: A comprehensive program for fitting exploratory and semiconfirmatory factor analysis and IRT models. Appl Psychol Meas. 2013;37:497–8. 140. Brown TA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Second edition. Guilford Publications; 2015. 482 p. 141. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy: towards a unified model of behavior change. World Psychiatry [Internet]. 2019 [citado 4 de dezembro de 2022];18(2):226–7. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502411/ 142. Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, et al. Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A Revised Measure of Psychological Inflexibility and Experiential Avoidance. Behav Ther [Internet]. 2011 [citado 20 de março de 2022];42(4):676–88. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789411000888 143. Hayes, S. C. A Liberated Mind: The essential guide to ACT. London: Vermilion; 2019. 144. The work-related acceptance and action questionnaire (WAAQ): Initial psychometric findings and their implications for measuring psychological flexibility in specific contexts | Association for Contextual Behavioral Science [Internet]. [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023]. Disponível em: https://contextualscience.org/WAAQ_Bond_Lloyd_Guenola 145. Palmeira L, Cunha M, Pinto-Gouveia J, Carvalho S, Lillis J. New developments in the assessment of weight-related experiential avoidance (AAQW-Revised). J Context Behav Sci [Internet]. julho de 2016 [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023];5(3):193–200. Disponível em: 95 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212144716300333 146. Lorenzo-Seva, U., Ferrando, P. J. FACTOR 9.2: A comprehensive program for fotting exploratory and semiconfirmatory factor analysis and IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement; 2013. 147. Paladines-Costa B, López-Guerra V, Ruisoto P, Vaca-Gallegos S, Cacho R. Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Spanish Version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) in Ecuador. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 13 de março de 2021;18(6):2944. 148. Otero TB. Evidências de Validade do AAQ-II (Questionário de Aceitação e Ação II) em Profissionais da Atenção Promária à Saúde no Brasil e Correlações com Ansiesdade Mindfulness e Autocompaixão. SÃO PAULO. 2016;106. 149. Hutcheson GD, Sofroniou N. The Multivariate Social Scientist: Introductory Statistics Using Generalized Linear Models. 1st edition. London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications Ltd; 1999. 288 p. 150. Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika [Internet]. 1o de junho de 1965 [citado 4 de dezembro de 2022];30(2):179–85. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447 151. Patil VH, Singh SN, Mishra S, Todd Donavan D. Efficient theory development and factor retention criteria: Abandon the ‘eigenvalue greater than one’ criterion. J Bus Res [Internet]. 1o de fevereiro de 2008 [citado 4 de dezembro de 2022];61(2):162–70. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829630700152X 152. Fava JL, Velicer WF. The effects of overextraction on factor and component analysis. Multivar Behav Res. 1992;27:387–415. 153. Child D. The Essentials of Factor Analysis. A&C Black; 2006. 200 p. 154. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston : Pearson/Allyn & Bacon; 2007. 155. Reise SP, Moore TM, Haviland MG. Bifactor Models and Rotations: Exploring the Extent to which Multidimensional Data Yield Univocal Scale Scores. J Pers Assess [Internet]. novembro de 2010 [citado 4 de dezembro de 2022];92(6):544–59. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2981404/ 156. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Second Edition. Second edição. New York: The Guilford Press; 2004. 157. Huysamen GK. Coefficient alpha : unnecessarily ambiguous ; unduly ubiquitous. 2006 [citado 4 de dezembro de 2022]; Disponível em: https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/4295 158. Lila M, Oliver A, Catalá-Miñana A, Galiana L, Gracia E. The Intimate Partner Violence Responsibility Attribution Scale (IPVRAS). Eur J Psychol Appl Leg Context [Internet]. 1o de janeiro de 2014 [citado 4 de dezembro de 2022];6(1):29–36. Disponível em: 96 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1889186114700095 159. Wilcox S, Schoffman DE, Dowda M, Sharpe PA. Psychometric properties of the 8-item english arthritis self-efficacy scale in a diverse sample. Arthritis. 2014;2014:385256. 160. DiStefano C. Examining fit with structural equation models. Em: Principles and methods of test construction: Standards and recent advances. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe; 2016. p. 166–93. (Psychological assessment—science and practice). 161. Apêndices_pdf.pdf [Internet]. [citado 27 de janeiro de 2023]. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ismt.pt/bitstream/123456789/862/2/Ap%c3%aandices_pdf.pdf 162. Tourangeau R, Yan T. Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol Bull. setembro de 2007;133(5):859–83. 163. Fischer R, Karl JA. A Primer to (Cross-Cultural) Multi-Group Invariance Testing Possibilities in R. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2019 [citado 4 de dezembro de 2022];10. Disponível em: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01507 164. Bichi A, Talib R. Item Response Theory: An Introduction to Latent Trait Models to Test and Item Development. Int J Eval Res Educ IJERE. 1o de junho de 2018;7. 165. Cavalcanti AL da SR, Bagarollo MF, Lipp MEN, Constantini AC. Treino de controle do stress de Lipp: uma revisão integrativa de literatura. Bol - Acad Paul Psicol [Internet]. 2021 [citado 18 de maio de 2023];41(100):37–47. Disponível em: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1415- 711X2021000100005&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt 166. Chawla N, Ostafin B. Experiential avoidance as a functional dimensional approach to psychopathology: an empirical review. J Clin Psychol. 2007;63(9):871–90. 167. Dadfar M, Momeni Safarabad N, Asgharnejad Farid AA, Nemati Shirzy M, Ghazie pour Abarghouie F. Reliability, validity, and factorial structure of the World Health Organization-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5) in Iranian psychiatric outpatients. Trends Psychiatry Psychother [Internet]. abril de 2018 [citado 29 de janeiro de 2023];40(2):79–84. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237- 60892018000200079&lng=en&tlng=en 168. Bech P, Gudex C, Johansen S. The WHO (Ten) Weil-Being Index: Validation in Diabetes. Psychother Psychosom [Internet]. 1996 [citado 29 de janeiro de 2023];65(4):183– 90. Disponível em: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/289073 169. Apóstolo JLA, Mendes AC, Azeredo ZA. Adaptation to Portuguese of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS). Rev Lat Am Enfermagem [Internet]. dezembro de 2006 [citado 29 de janeiro de 2023];14(6):863–71. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104- 11692006000600006&lng=en&tlng=en 170. Szabó, M. The Short Version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) Factor Structure in a Young Adolescent Sample. Journal of Adolescence. J Adolesc [Internet]. 97 2010 [citado 4 de novembro de 2022];1–8. Disponível em: https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?Refer enceID=1468989 171. MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS. Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:593–614. 172. Brown TA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, Second Edition. New York: Guilford Publications; 2015. 482 p. 173. Cobos Sanchiz D, Espejo M, Sánchez L, Matud M. The Importance of Work-Related Events and Changes in Psychological Distress and Life Satisfaction amongst Young Workers in Spain: A Gender Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:4697. 174. Barbayannis G, Bandari M, Zheng X, Baquerizo H, Pecor KW, Ming X. Academic Stress and Mental Well-Being in College Students: Correlations, Affected Groups, and COVID-19. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2022 [citado 4 de dezembro de 2022];13. Disponível em: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886344 175. Ravikumar T. Occupational stress and psychological wellbeing during COVID 19: Mediating role of positive psychological capital. Curr Psychol N B NJ. 2022;1–8. 176. Kim HG, Cheon EJ, Bai DS, Lee YH, Koo BH. Stress and Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature. Psychiatry Investig. 2018;15(3):235–45. 177. Field A, Miles J, Field Z. Discovering Statistics Using R. London: Sage; 2012. 178. Costa J, Marôco J, Pinto-Gouveia J, Galhardo A. Validation of the Psychometric Properties of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II in Clinical and Nonclinical Groups of Portuguese Population. Int J Psychol. 2014;12. 179. Dixon MR, Hayes SC, Stanley C, Law S, al-Nasser T. Is Acceptance and Commitment Training or Therapy (ACT) a Method that Applied Behavior Analysts Can and Should Use? Psychol Rec [Internet]. 2020 [citado 4 de dezembro de 2022];70(4):559–79. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00436-9 180. Monestès JL, Karekla M, Jacobs N, Michaelides MP, Hooper N, Kleen M, et al. Experiential avoidance as a common psychological process in European cultures. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2018;34:247–57. 181. Espejo EP, Gorlick A, Castriotta N. Changes in threat-related cognitions and experiential avoidance in group-based transdiagnostic CBT for anxiety disorders. J Anxiety Disord. 2017;46:65–71. 182. Gámez W, Chmielewski M, Kotov R, Ruggero C, Watson D. Development of a measure of experiential avoidance: the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire. Psychol Assess. 2011;23(3):692–713. 183. Strauss B, Gawlytta R, Schleu A, Frenzl D. Negative effects of psychotherapy: estimating the prevalence in a random national sample. BJPsych Open [Internet]. 2021 [citado 98 4 de dezembro de 2022];7(6):e186. Disponível em: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bjpsych-open/article/negative-effects-of- psychotherapy-estimating-the-prevalence-in-a-random-national- sample/1C4E7F900F5CAF2CFAD129D54E4CC00C# 184. Valencia P.D. Does the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II really measure experiential avoidance. Rev Evaluar. 2019;42–52. 185. Wolgast M. What does the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II) really measure? Behav Ther. 2014;45(6):831–9. 186. Rochefort C, Baldwin AS, Chmielewski M. Experiential Avoidance: An Examination of the Construct Validity of the AAQ-II and MEAQ. Behav Ther. maio de 2018;49(3):435–49. 187. Andrade C. Internal, External, and Ecological Validity in Research Design, Conduct, and Evaluation. Indian J Psychol Med [Internet]. 2018 [citado 4 de dezembro de 2022];40(5):498–9. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6149308/ 188. Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R, Tatham R. Análise Multivariada de Dados. Bookman; 2009. 189. Vandenberghe L, Valadão VC. Aceitação, validação e mindfulness na psicoterapia cognitivo-comportamental contemporânea. Rev Bras Ter Cogn [Internet]. dezembro de 2013 [citado 4 de outubro de 2022];9(2):126–35. Disponível em: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1808- 56872013000200008&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt 190. Lipp, M.E.N. Pesquisas sobre stress no Brasil: saúde, ocupações e grupos de risco. Campinas: Papiros; 1996. 191. Lipp MEN. Estresse emocional: a contribuicao de estressores internos e externos. Rev Psiquiatr Clín [Internet]. 2001 [citado 22 de outubro de 2022];347–9. Disponível em: http://www.hcnet.usp.br/ipq/revista/vol28/n6/artigos/art347.htm 192. Sadir MA, Bignotto MM, Lipp MEN. Stress e qualidade de vida: influência de algumas variáveis pessoais. Paid Ribeirão Preto [Internet]. abril de 2010 [citado 6 de outubro de 2022];20:73–81. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/j/paideia/a/ctxdtbWNVN6FFJCFfvtGKXJ/?lang=pt 193. Rusch L, Kanter J, Leonard R, Weeks C. Depression stigma in a predominantly low income African American sample with elevated depressive symptoms. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1o de janeiro de 2009;196:919–22. 194. Burato KR da S, Crippa JA de S, Loureiro SR. Transtorno de ansiedade social e comportamentos de evitação e de segurança: uma revisão sistemática. Estud Psicol Natal [Internet]. 2009 [citado 10 de setembro de 2018];14(2):167–74. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1413- 294X2009000200010&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt 99 195. Kashdan TB, Rottenberg J. Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clin Psychol Rev [Internet]. 2010 [citado 4 de dezembro de 2022];30(7):865–78. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735810000413 196. Kamenov K, Twomey C, Cabello M, Prina AM, Ayuso-Mateos JL. The efficacy of psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and their combination on functioning and quality of life in depression: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2017;47(3):414–25. 197. Vázquez GH. The Impact of Psychopharmacology on Contemporary Clinical Psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry Rev Can Psychiatr [Internet]. 2014 [citado 4 de dezembro de 2022];59(8):412–6. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4143297/ 198. Sampieri R, Collado C, Lucio M. Definições dos enfoques quantitativo e qualitativo, suas semelhanças e diferenças. Porto Alegre: Penso; 2013. 199. Wilson T, Lindsey S, Schooler T. A Model of Dual Attitudes. Psychol Rev. 1o de fevereiro de 2000;107:101–26. 200. Latkin CA, Edwards C, Davey-Rothwell MA, Tobin KE. The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland. Addict Behav [Internet]. outubro de 2017 [citado 4 de dezembro de 2022];73:133–6. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519338/ 201. Rusch LC, Kanter JW, Manos RC, Weeks CE. Depression stigma in a predominantly low income African American sample with elevated depressive symptoms. J Nerv Ment Dis. dezembro de 2008;196(12):919–22.pt_BR
dc.type.degreeDoutoradopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Tese (PPGPIOS)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
AVALIAÇÃO PSICOMÉTRICA DO QUESTIONÁRIO DE ACEITAÇÃO E AÇÃO-II E AFERIÇÃO DO IMPACTO DO ESTRESSE NO BEM-ESTAR PSICOLÓGICO A PARTIR DA INFLEXIBILIDADE PSICOLÓGICA-TESE- Cybele P Cypriano.pdfTese de doutorado4,91 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons