Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/16377
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorLordelo, Patricia-
dc.contributor.authorMaron, Fabio-
dc.contributor.authorBarros, Daniela G.-
dc.contributor.authorBarroso, Danilo V.-
dc.contributor.authorBessa Junior, José de-
dc.contributor.authorBarroso Júnior, Ubirajara de Oliveira-
dc.creatorLordelo, Patricia-
dc.creatorMaron, Fabio-
dc.creatorBarros, Daniela G.-
dc.creatorBarroso, Danilo V.-
dc.creatorBessa Junior, José de-
dc.creatorBarroso Júnior, Ubirajara de Oliveira-
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-10T15:06:57Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-10T15:06:57Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.issn1677-5538-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/16377-
dc.descriptionTexto completo: acesso restrito. p. 383-388pt_BR
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the basic knowledge of pre–school teachers who deal with children between the ages of 4 and 7 years, who present signs of lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a survey with 50 teachers from 9 private schools working with pre–school children. The criteria for selection were if teachers were certified or non–certified elementary school teachers – NCEST and the amount of professional experience. RESULTS: Thirty–three teachers considered that the normal daily urinary frequency should be from 4 to 7 times. Two of the 50 teachers considered it normal to urinate less than 4 times per day and 15 teachers considered more than 7 times per day as normal. There was no difference between the 2 categories of certified or NCEST nor between those with more or less than five years of professional experience. Thirty–three percent believed that to urinate more than 4 times during a class period (4–5 hours) could indicate a urinary problem. There was a statistically significant difference among the certified and NCEST but not in terms of time of professional experience. If during this period the child would not ask to urinate, only 18% considered that as an indication of urinary problem. When asked about the symptoms that would indicate urinary urgency and urge incontinence, only 24% of the teachers connected it with urinary problem. There was no difference in terms of professional background or professional experience in these 2 last analyses. CONCLUSION: Our data shows evidences that private pre–schools teachers are not well informed of the clinical manifestation of LUTD.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.sourcehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382007000300012pt_BR
dc.subjectChildrenpt_BR
dc.subjectUrinary incontinencept_BR
dc.subjectEtiologypt_BR
dc.subjectEnuresispt_BR
dc.subjectSchoolspt_BR
dc.titleLower urinary tract dysfunction in children. What do pre–school teachers know about it?pt_BR
dc.title.alternativeInternational Brazilian Journal of Urologypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.numberv. 33, n. 3pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo Publicado em Periódico (Faculdade de Medicina)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
1677-55382007000300012.pdf24,17 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.